Reply to post: Isn't this obvious?

Intel 'underestimates error bounds by 1.3 QUINTILLION'

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Isn't this obvious?

Whatever the documentation says, you wouldn't really expect an accurate result for sin(1e99), would you? (By "1e99" I mean a binary floating-point approximation of 1e99.)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon