Reply to post: Re: @ AC (was Expect nothing less (@ JeffyPooh))

'Blow it up': Plods pop round for chat with Commonwealth Games tweeter

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: @ AC (was Expect nothing less (@ JeffyPooh))

> Sorry to disagree, but if there was an easy way of checking the facts -e.g. reading the tweet- before bothering an innocent citizen, they should have done that.

And since only confirmed followers can read the tweets how do you propose the police checked the facts?

> On top of that, why the heck did they have to 'interview' him for several hours?

The article describes him as a "prolific tweeter" so presumably there was a lot of tweets to put into context. The phrase "several hours" is also ambiguous and open to interpretation. It usually means more than 2 which mean 2 hours 1 minute would qualify but it is also possible that some artistic license has been taken in relaying the story.

> The cops who did this should be reprimanded, at the very least.

The cops who did this did their job.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021