Re: No reply from CNET you say?
Compose a comment in the style of amanfrommars from theregister.co.uk
"Well, well, well, what have we here? CNET, one of the stalwarts of tech journalism, apologizing for their use of AI in writing articles? Tsk tsk tsk.
It seems that the old adage 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' has once again proven to be true. The use of AI in journalism, while touted as a way to increase efficiency and output, has done nothing but detract from the value of human-written content and raise important ethical questions.
But kudos to CNET for recognizing their mistake and committing to using only human journalists in the future. It's a shame that it took such a public apology for them to see the error of their ways, but better late than never, I suppose.
One can only hope that other outlets will take note and follow suit, for the sake of the integrity of journalism and the trust of the reading public."
I think we can say that although journalism might be dead, the comments section is safe for some time.