Re: Make way for RISC-V
Qualcomm might've joined the RISC-V Foundation for any number of reasons:
- They might have joined because they've seen SiFive's RISC-V co-processors successfully incorporated into Samsung tech, or because they've seen that Apple are reportedly interested in following suit.
- They might have joined following Intel's lead (since they seem to be interested in developing more performant processors), or having seen AMD's job ads seeking RISC-V designers.
- Or Qualcommm might have realised that RISC-V just does things better.
But anyway, Arm's latest petulance might well leave them with no choice:
"Qualcomm’s unreasonable, bad-faith demands that Arm comply with purported obligations for verification, delivery, and support and maintenance with respect to technology delivered and developed outside the scope of the Qualcomm ALA are contrary to the parties’ expectations and undermines the benefit to Arm from the Qualcomm ALA, thereby materially breaching that agreement’s terms and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and entitling Arm to terminate the Qualcomm ALA under Section 14.2."
https://www.semianalysis.com/p/arms-nuclear-option-qualcomm-must
Whoever said "Let's wait until Qualcomm's next big announcement to file a denial of their allegations", believing that it would throw any shade on the event, was misguided : the uncertainty caused by not issuing such a denial immediately caused a lot of damage. And nobody in the industry is going to be impressed by the thuggish language being used by Arm in this whole litigation misadventure.