Elon Musk reportedly outlines horrible Twitter layoff process Twitter owner, sole director and – according to his Twitter profile, now also "Twitter Complaint Hotline Operator" – has reportedly informed company staff that layoffs begin tomorrow. Accounts of an internal email detailing the layoffs have reached The New York Times and The Washington Post, both of which report that as of …
That this was ever a thing. While I watch on with great interest and popcorn, any impact to Twatter will have no impact to me. i've never been on it and never will. But, I sure enjoy the blathering I hear about it.
Sites like this that are not real time is as social as I like to get because, let's face it, most people suck. I prefer to keep my distance from them, and I'm sure they feel the same.
Popcorn icon, please.
Never had a Twitter account. Or Facebook. So doesn't really matter to me if Twitter survives. From a purely technical viewpoint (as career IT), I have to wonder if we are watching Twitter implode. Will there be outages in the next few days as all the corporate knowledge gets let go or leaves on their own? "Systems are down because Dave always took care of that, and Dave is gone......" I've worked at a company that had recurring layoffs and brain drain was painful. Morale is going to be horrible, and rumors are that Musk has already decreed 80 hour work week death marches to meet his deadlines. Anybody with any kind of skills will be mass mailing their resumes to all those recruiters that are always flooding our inboxes. It would be interesting to see statistics on the number of Twitter employees that have updated their LinkedIn profiles this week.
He's cutting payroll to reduce expenses. But if he loses the confidence of the advertisers where won't be revenue.
On top of that, social media sites provide a platform. Content creators are what brings in the eyeballs. Piss off the content creators and they will find another platform. Or more likely, they are already also on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Twitch, etc, and Twitter just becomes irrelevant. Then Twitter won't have to page views to support their ad pricing.
Maybe I'm just underestimating the loyalty of Twitter users. Dunno. Feels like a train wreck.
Interestingly, on the BBC R4 news yesterday, someone now ex-Twitter pointed out the "one" person responsible for dealing with celebrity accounts abuse has been "let go". With the Football World Cup about to start in Qatar very soon. So, who's going to deal with that now? Will the "slebs" now have the same issues as the "plebs" when it comes to complaints about abusive tweets? That's not going to encourage them to pay for a blue tick.
I've had an account for 10 years but never used it. Having forced time off for surgery meant I had a rummage and amongst oceans of dross there is very good content from people I admire in our field; Alan Hollub, Martin Fowler, Lukas Eder, etc.
It's been stimulating and I wish I'd been active years ago; I believe I'd be less cynical and burned out about the job I still find fascinating given the chance.
Ironic that his takeover and the possible car crash caused me to engage with it!
I bothered signing up after Elon's first announcement early this year. Had his offer to buy it been canceled, I would have deleted my account. Now I'm watching things unfold, and it seems to have already changed in subtle ways. Fewer "bots" are a possibility already, based on my perception of the level of trolling and the nature of it (compared to a couple of weeks ago anyway).
If it is worth while I think more people might like the *new* *improved* version.... or hold even more contempt for it.
whatever.
Elon Musk reported to have fired Twitter curation team responsible for tackling misinformation
And 5 days before US mid-term elections. Amazing coincidence.
"Worth" - to those who think losing ~$0.25bn a year is 'good business'.
How many years did it take Amazon to show a profit? Is it truly a loss if the business is worth more year after year? Looking at one line on the financials is not always a good indication of how the business is doing.
not "everyone"
Ok - everyone other than the 'conservative' idiots who have a fetish for thinking that the 'libs' who run the mainstream media hate them..
So Bob - why are you not on Parler/Truth Social or one of the other failing 'conservative-friendly[1]' services?
Oh yes - it's because they are manifestly crap and only populated by mouth-breathing freezepeach types that wouldn't recognise reality of it jumped out in front of them waving a big neon sign saying "Hello - I'm reality"!
I do have to admit that there are equally-bad morons that the other side of the US political spectrum (ie - akin to the UK Conservative party). It's just they tend to be fixated on other things other than their perceived persecution.
[1] Which inevitably means tolerance for extreme right-wing beliefs and behaviours and extreme intolerance for anything resembling balance.
being laid off entitles you to unemployment compensation, which is billed to the company that did the layoff. If you get work within the next 6 months, that bill to the company no longer exists. It is in the best interest for the company to give you a nice reference for your next gig.
being fired gets you an accompanied speed-walk carrying your personal things in a box, right out the front door, and not a very nice reference for future employers that want to know why you left. NO unemployment is paid by the company or government.
If there is a reason to FIRE rather than LAY OFF, guess which route will be taken?
Yeah, and firing people is really easy.... in some jurisdictions. Not in most parts of Europe (but then I don't know how much staff they have here). There is things like giving proper warning etc. It is not as easy as his Muskness would like it.
Laying off people takes time (at least here), depending on how long you have been here they need to continue paying you for a couple of months - and they usually walk you out of the building with your personal effects in a box, and tell you not to come back and not to use any IT system of your soon-to-be ex-employer.
Does anyone know if this has happened to any of the French employees? If so, it's an early Christmas for them. French redundancies can be eye watering expensive*, not following the rules will incur serious fines that'll make even EM wince.
*Multiples of annual salary & pension uplifts if you've been long enough in service.
From the reports I've seen, at least in some jurisdictions if not all, Twitter will be paying full salaries till Feb'24. That might get him off the hook for some of the redundancies in some countries. They *may* be classed as still employed by Twitter until then, or at least "paid in lieu of notice". Skipping the legal notifications is a different kettle of fish though. Being notified of your redundancy by discovering you can no longer log into your work accounts is an especially shitty way of doing it.
@Bob, You make an interesting point about the advantage to EM if he fires anyone he can, but if you've already begun the layoff process can you go back and retroactively fire them? Maybe in the states with the current SCOTUS this will become a new precedent.
I'm sorry, aren't you supposed to be managing Tesla 40 hours per week already ? Minimum ?
Oh, silly me, that's for the peons (aka everyone but you).
But really, hotline operator ?
Do you really think anyone's going to buy that bullshit ?
Well, at least you might have done one good thing for Twitter : kill it.
(Oblig. Never twitted.) It is sad when pioneers who struggled to bring something useful to the rest of us are elbowed aside by accountants who think they can milk the project and charge for previously free stuff or remove essentials or initiate a paradiddle of marketing-driven changes with little relevance to the core users.
On the other hand, this is Twitter. An opportunity, if ever there was one, to learn from the mistakes of others and build something better. Not sad at all.
If Elon Musk can remove the political bias, clean up the cruft inside the company, and actually produce what he says he wants to produce, then I think the Twitter has a chance of becoming a usuable platform.
I am happy to see that someone is putting his money where his mouth is in order to attempt to re-establish some kind of normality..
I mean really, does anyone here think that Elon really ever wanted to own or run Twitter? Of course not, his mouth simply ran away before his brain properly engaged; 'funding secured' anyone!
But this time, alas, it has blown up in his face and he's stuck with it. Which is slightly reassuring if we believe that the LAW is actually universal and applies to everyone irrespective of how many billions they are (on paper) worth!
I think the issue with very, very wealthy people is that they tend to accrue hangers on who simply say what they think the boss wants to hear, rather than what they really NEED to hear. So if someone close had said 'Elon, you are coming across as a fucking idiot, just stop now, you twat', it would all have worked out much better!
Alas no, it's a shame that the positive contributions he has made to human endeavour will be completely overshadowed by short term fuckwittewry.
C'est la vieu.
And yes, I'm sure there will be more than a few downvotes for this comment - I would be genuinely interested in knowing why, and what their counterpoints are - I suspect I am going to be disappointed though.
John
"I think the issue with very, very wealthy people is that they tend to accrue hangers on who simply say what they think the boss wants to hear, rather than what they really NEED to hear. So if someone close had said 'Elon, you are coming across as a fucking idiot, just stop now, you twat', it would all have worked out much better!"
Generally, they don't "accrue" people like that. It's more Darwinian. If you tell the boss things s/he doesn't want to hear, you don't last long in their employ. At least not when the boss is a sociopath type.
Do you know of someone on left that was suspended/cancelled ? Or that has their tweets removed..
Not me. But I don't recall anyone on the left posting the sort of things which got those on the right suspended and cancelled.
The right presumes "acceptability" is wherever they stand and thus inevitably feels persecuted because it isn't.
Wasn't Twitter (and possibly Facebook) one of the main means of communication for the organizers of the Summer 2020 protests and riots? Were they planned and advertised on Twitter? Shouldn't the propagators of such - that caused the rioting and looting and burning in big cities - have had their accounts suspended and cancelled?
And what about all the crazy anti-Trump postings after the 2016 election? Madonna wanting to "burn the White House down". Or Kathy Griffin's disturbing Trump-head photo? I hate Trump like a fucking herpes sore, but what happened to the accounts of these people on the left after they did what they did? Freedom of speech is a protected legal issue, but when did our society decide that such things were socially acceptable coming from either side (including Trump's disgusting "grab them by the pussy" quote)?
I've said for years - we need to destroy the Internet. It's too strong a tonic for humanity and brings out the absolute worst in us as a society.
Do you know of someone on left that should be suspended/cancelled ? Or that should have their tweets removed..
We all know the right wingers that were removed or have their Tweets redacted/removed for spouting lies, hatred and inciting violence/insurrection
All we've had since 2016 is hate from the left. Now they are trying to be nice with the covid amnesty but no-one is buying it.
The restriction of voting rights is a fever dream by the left. Even the lefts favourite socialist (but not really) European countries have restrictions on voting that are tougher than the US.
"The restriction of voting rights is a fever dream by the left. Even the lefts favourite socialist (but not really) European countries have restrictions on voting that are tougher than the US."
Evidence?
FWIW, most European nations have very few restriction on who can vote. At town/city level, proof of residence is about all you need, not even citizenship. Likewise when voting for MEPs at EU level. Most require citizenship to vote for national government representatives and that right is NOT removed just because some voters may be in prison, unlike most/all of the USA.
Stop moving the goalposts :) Convicted felons have had restricted voting rights in the US for a LOOOOOOOONG time! I'm not saying its right, the whole US custodial system is pretty much broken at every level.
Voting rights are not being unduly restricted in the US. There is simply a fundamentally broken electoral system that favours VAST bureaucracy and complexity in order to employ a vast number of people.
"Voting rights are not being unduly restricted in the US. There is simply a fundamentally broken electoral system that favours VAST bureaucracy and complexity in order to employ a vast number of people."
I didn't say they were unduly restricted in the US. I was disputing the claim that they are more restricted in Europe than the US. On the other hand, your statement above seems to confirm that voting is more restricted in the US than it ought to be even if only by incompetent bureaucracy rather than ill intent.
AIUI, in the US, the onus is on the person to register as a voter. In the UK, at least, every residential address is regularly sent a form (annually, more or less) listing those who live there that are registered to vote, which can be ignored if there are no changes, or any new eligible voters can be added to the form and sent back to the returning officer to update the Electoral Register. It's generally very simple although in some cases new residents at the address may need to go in and show ID to prove who they are and there eligibility to vote
When you talk about your political opponents “lies” fir which they should be cancelled, you are showing your own side dictatorial and anti-democratic tendencies.
How do you think all those dictatorships explain why they killed free press in their countries as not by using exactly the same argument as you do?
Good point. On the other hand, being accused of bias by both sides doesn't mean you are not biased. It just means you are not biased *enough* to either the left or the right since the people accusing of bias are invariably the extreme left or right :-)
Within the last two years it definately wasn't in anyones interest to say anything about Vaccines, Masks, the Virus or alternative solutions. It's only now coming to surface that much of what was said were political lies..
Try saying anything opinionated about people that believe that they are the opposite sex... Or about the medical practicioners cutting up childrens bodies for the sake of ideology. It's got nothing to do with hate, it's just about having an opinion.. On the next few years the lawsuits will be flowing and the tide will turn on this ideology. For the moment it's being used as a political means to gain votes and outcast the naysayers..
Try having an opinion about BLM, the organisation, and where the money actually goes... Try asking about Black on Black death and not getting booted out. .. Try asking the poor folks in the suburbs how much their lives have improved due to BLMs's "campaign"... .. Again it's a political agenda.
There are far more subjects but these are the easy, popular ones.
Elon Musk understood how the governments and big business directly or indirectly have been using Twitter et al as a means of political persuassion.. Why would Jack Dorsey be backing Musk on this. Dorsey left Twitter probably due to the fact that he didn't want to have to deal with the 3 letter agencies, he understood where things were going.. Musk has got enough fuck you money that he doesn't have to care, so he's decided to kick back at the institutions.. Why would that be a bad thing for anyone ?
Your in the wrong place for that kind of talk. This lot would vote Biden in again if they could. Try telling them that the newyork post tried to publish an article on Twitter which exposed Bidens son Hunter for the influence peddling crack head he is by detailing his lost laptop, only twitter censored the article and any other factual anti democrat articles too. And they will just call you a Musk fanboy or something similar. They dont care about freedom of speech, they been totally brainwashed by the BBC for their entire lives because the BBC is a non biassed and factual news source dont you know.
The only time I was close to setting up a Twatter account was during the AZ-303 Azure solution architect training. I was very good, with lots of exercises.
At one point, the exercise went on this way:
- set up an Azure function
- configure it to use your twitter account
- configure it to scan whatever other twitter account and re-tweet whatever it says
- like it or not depending on words used
I ended up not having this twitter account, just read the training steps ...
That's where I understood that most twitter activity is not directly resulting from human activity but bots.
It's 10 mins to set up such a bot to do whatever. That's how you see "people" re-tweeting at any minute day and night ...
Yes, Musky, the Chief Twat, bought this thing WAY too much !
I like the assumption that everyone taking the course will have an account and familiarity with Twitter. Reminds me of one job offer which was contingent on me providing my propective employer with access to my Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn accounts. I pointed out that:
1) I don't have accounts on any of them.
2) It breaches the terms and conditions of those sites to give them my credentials
3) I was declining the job offer as they sounded like control freaks
"2) It breaches the terms and conditions of those sites to give them my credentials"
Maybe, just maybe, however unlikely, that was a test :-)
(Yes, I know, far to many reports, especially of US employers, asking exactly for those credentials in all seriousness.)
I hope this puts a stop to the semi-random crap Twitter tried, like "hey let's 'subscribe' you to topics, none of which you're not interested in!"
No. I'm following people & organizations I'm specifically interested in. Get that trash out of here.
"Hey let's randomly reshuffle your timeline so it's no longer a timeline to show 'top' tweets!"
No. Now I'm pissed off because stuff I'm interested in now only randomly appears when I refresh.
I actually stopped bothering for 5-6 months until they added an option to "show tweets as they occur"
Now I look at it about once every 3-4 days, when I used to be on there daily.
The only thing twitter is "good" for, is for a place to bitch about poor service, since most companies don't have a support center any more.
A while back we tried to set up a twitter account to promote an open source project. The first problem was that it forcibly truncated the project name making it meaningless. The second was that it tampered with the logo by cropping it into a circular image with blurred border into which only part of the logo fitted. Attempting to correct this by deleting and retrying the logo few times caused the account to be locked, and we never got a response from the twits when we challenged this. Net result - no usable twitter account for the project, although the residue of this debacle is probably still present somewhere on the platform (probably still locked and, we hope, invisible).
Putting aside for a moment any debate on what value Twitter adds (or doesn't add) to society as a whole...
I'm not familiar with the law around takeovers, competition, etc. for here in the UK, never mind the USA, but I have a genuine question here. Twitter in it's pre-Musk state was employing thousands of people, then Elon comes along with an unsolicited offer to buy the company. He then lays off all those workers, seemingly without any thought of social responsibility. I appreciate that business is business, and bottom line needs to be protected, but if something similar happened in the UK would some regulatory stop the takeover on the grounds is damaging for so many people?
Most of the US runs on ‘at will’ employment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment) so employees can be fired for no reason at any time, so the takeover is just continuing the situation that existed before.
For Twitter employees in the EU there might well be a different process to go through, I know when I’ve been at companies doing mass lay-offs in the UK pre-brexit there was a 30 day consultation period, and it was roles not people that were cut - so you sometimes had a chance to try for a remaining position if they are reducing say developers from 10 to 6.
"employees can be fired for no reason at any time"
that is actually not true. "wrongful termination" is still a legit reason for a lawsuit. And nobody wants to work for a company that is that 'unstable' with its employees.
Then again I work mostly as a contractor and am used to projects lasting for a time, then I leave and go elsewhere as there is no more work for me to do. Personally, i like it BETTER that way.
Wow... Looking at the utter lack of workers rights:
- At-Will Employment and Wrongful Termination
- Yes, At-Will Employees Can Sue For Wrongful Termination
And then you get out-of-work white MAGA men with guns wondering about upset with women and non-whites, I guess because wrongful termination due to discrimination is one of the few straws people can try clutch on to to keep their job. They shouldn't be upset with women and non-whites, they should be upset with how businesses treat workers and the lack of workers rights.
It's a state-by-state law. It's been around in various forms (according to your reference) since 1870. That said, I didn't have to look it up. I had to deal with it in the 1990s and again in the mid-00s when I was an administrator. I was acutely aware of it in the mid-1990s as an employee when I needed extended time off to care for an elderly parent and used the federal Family Leave Act. So, yeah, it's been around for a long time and it depends on the state in which you are employed with some specific rules which were made federal.
There is already a class action suit filed for him doing a repeat of what he did at Tesla: ignoring applicable laws. Even in the US, workers do not go completely unprotected.
In California there's a law that requires to give workers SIXTY DAYS notice before layoffs. Quote from the BBC:
"The federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act restricts large companies from mounting mass layoffs without at least 60 days of advance notice.
The lawsuit asks the court to issue an order requiring Twitter to obey the WARN Act, and restricting the company from soliciting employees to sign documents that could give up their right to participate in litigation."
Translated: the suit also tries to prevent Musk from deceiving people into signing away their rights. I assume that at a minimu that gves people 60 days more salary, but we'll have to see how this goes. It could get a lot more expensive for Musk, and that's without any guarantee that the service would become financially viable after all now his deserved reputation + likely resulting lack of moderation is scaring away advertisers.
That's what you get when you start believing your own hubris.
I think a lot of us had concluded he's a psychopath long before this episode. The saddest thing for me is he's often presented as a "typical" person with Asperger's. Thankfully there are decent people out there with Asperger's showing that Musk's disgusting behaviour is not an intrinsic part of his autism (see Dave Plummer for example).
"I assume that at a minimu that gves people 60 days more salary, but we'll have to see how this goes."
I've seen reports Twitter will pay salary to Feb'24. That may satisfy US law, or at least ameliorate the fall-out, but I don't think it will fly as well in EU countries or the UK. I've no idea if or how it might affect things elsewhere in the world though.
I have a Twitter account but haven’t posted anything for ages. It’s main value to me is to get notifications of local travel issues (the local police and transport operators post updates to Twitter) - more accessible and immediate than Facebook (besides which, I deleted that account several years ago). However, I think it’s now time to delete my Twitter presence…
Love to see the traditional "I've never used Twitter but here's what I think..." opinions. But another way to think about it is: Maybe if you don't know anything about it beyond its reputation, perhaps you don't need to share your opinion? What can you possibly add to the conversation? But people still do it, like a dog replying to every single article about aeronautical engineering because they once heard their owner say the word "plane".
As someone who uses it daily I think it's fair to say Twitter is a hellsite, but I've learnt a huge amount from being there. Yesterday it introduced me to the concept of the Trust Thermocline, something that I immediately recognised but had never seen named before. No other site compares for a mix of super-insightful threads, incredibly fast on-the-ground news when significant things happen, and absolutely ridiculous shitposting. It's been great and it's been awful but this feels like a death-spiral and people are leaving daily, it may be that the final great achievement of Twitter will be to lose Elon Musk $44 billion.
Still, it's a massive site and it has/had some good engineers, this is a great time to be recruiting.
What I learned from the 20 minutes I was on Twitter is that avoiding it is a good way to aid your concentration and not waste your time on fluff. Realtime is too interruptive.
As for the great time for recruiting: if these people were not tied to the US we would have been interested as we'll need a good 30 or so in the next few months, and probably that again in a year, but we cannot risk any US influence in what we're doing - we had enough trouble keeping investors out with US ties (although it was kinda fun to see the shocked faces when their bids gets rejected, they're WAY to used to win a bid by merely offering more money). As we're in Europe, we take the law seriously and the US Cloud Act as well as the absence of any GDPR/DPA level privacy protection for users has become a major concern for our lawyers so they also ruled out anyone who could be leveraged.
It's a shame, but them are the breaks.
I have a suspicion that those who are engineers (i.e. do not need to "learn to code") will mostly be retained, but those who have high salaries for "moderating content" are all in the first wave of layoffs.
The average salary at Twitter is in the $140k/year range from what I have read. "Content Moderator" is probably NOT worth that much, especially when their activity gives the comopany such a bad reputation that Elon buys the company out to STOP them from doing it.
I've seen this before. The good ones who can will walk off. The crap ones who can't just walk off will stay.
Suddenly the company finds itself with only junior staff and has to scrabble to hire new staff, this immediately in the wake of demoralising and very public lay-offs. That in turn will mean that any decent candidate out there will decline any approaches unless they come with "danger money" salaries and cast iron contracts with nasty penalty payments for the company if it indulges in messing them about in the future.
Elon why is your foot bleeding, and is that burnt cordite I can smell?
Remember Bob, Average not Median salary.
If a few people at the top earn $10 million, a lot more earning $50k,can bring the average to $140k quite quickly.
It's always better to look at the median salary if you can find it. Still a quick 2 minute google search failed to find any info on the median for the while firm and some very shoebox medians for very specific job positions. So not particularly useful.
Still it's always good to remind people average does not equal median...
"Still it's always good to remind people average does not equal median..."
Yes, although I don't remember the examples given, I do very much remember a maths teacher at school demonstrating the difference between mean, mode and median and how vastly different the results can be using each method :-)
"Maybe if you don't know anything about it beyond its reputation, perhaps you don't need to share your opinion?"
Twitter is a platform to allow the poorly-informed to share their worthless opinions. It's a bit rich to complain when someone does it about the site itself, don't you think?
"As someone who uses it daily I think it's fair to say Twitter is a hellsite, but I've learnt a huge amount from being there."
So you have swum through the sewage of this "hellsite" and come up with a few golden nuggets. Well done. You'll understand why I won't shake your hand.
"bills that are likely to increase over the next few months as central banks use interest rate hikes to (hopefully) curb inflation"
What you probably mean is to curb the rise in the cost of living. "Inflation" is the expansion of money supply by central banks 'printing money'*, or allowing banks to loan out more money than they normally could by relaxing balance sheet requirements. If central banks really wanted to curb inflation they can do so incredibly easily by *stop effing printing money* or even better start destroying some of the magically created money by tightening balance sheet requirements and 'destroying'* previously magicked-out-of-thin-air fiat money.
Raising interest rates is putting a sticking plaster over a gunshot wound. And the central banks were the ones with their finger on the trigger!!
* not really printed or destroyed of course, just 'loan' numbers on a balance sheet
I had an account, just used it to talk to a few people.
Authors I have read
Some scientists in news
A celeb who borrowed a friends car for aTV shoot (she was lovely)
Then the daily emails started, unsubscribed.
Then I got recommended twerps to follow, after saying NO EMAILS (Z rated non entities)
Account deleted
Not sure whats better - losing one's job, or getting to stay to work for the most prominent t a**hole right-wing billionaires who has known now for a few months that he made a big error on vastly overpaying for a drain-circling, money-losing, indebted venture, and seems likely to take it out on the remining emplyees (80-hour weeks, etc).
Either way its a grim scenario - I predict that in 2 years Twitter will have basically lost all relevance - it's in a race to the bottom with Facebook.
My guess all along was that Musk was using the Twitter investment to diversify his wealth out of Tesla without alarming Tesla's investors (and tanking the stock) - likely scanario for me is that they both tank, as I think the guy, while certainly a clever engineer, has liitle clue about how to actually run a company.
Time will tell - my guess is he bankrupts all his companies, and with this qualification under his belt, goes on to become the Republican candidate for president who will "run politics like a business". Which basically means, for the benefit of the already rich guys.
"the guy, while certainly a clever engineer, has liitle clue about how to actually run a company."
The guy behaves like a twat, but looking at Tesla and SpaceX there is ample evidence that he is very good at running companies. Twitter might be biting off more than he can chew, but it will be fun watching the fireworks...
No, I don't use Twitter. Never have, never will.
But if I were one of the other investors in the $44b takeover, I would be seriously worried about how my investment would pay out, given the hype, reduced advertising and layoffs affecting the company share price and morale. I haven't seen anything in the press about their opinions.
Don't forget that losses can be offset against tax liabilities. This is one of the reasons for "going private". If this wasn't the case probably only a fraction of the deals would happen and, while that might not be such a bad thing, that's the world we live in.
So, Elon, just close it take the hit and start something similar with what's left after the bankruptcy.
It strikes me that this whole fiasco is a reminder of how weak Google's philosophy of just dropping products is. At this point Google Plus would probably have become the biggest social network if they had just bothered to keep it running and not done anything stupid to make it suck.
Unless 3,500 people were sitting around with nothing to do, this is going to be a total shitshow for those that remain. Having been one of the unlucky ones to be kept in a similar workforce culling, the work those other people were doing doesn't just magically disappear. It gets dumped on what's left of the staff, with the expectation that you'll pick it up. And the justification for the massive work increase? "Just be happy you still have a job." Uh, right. Couldn't get out there fast enough, shifting all my workload to someone already overloaded. Rinse and repeat. Eventually it all just collapsed.
In addition to extra work you'll be expected to be in office every day rather than WFH. Elon does not like WFH.
I can imagine a few people hoping they get some sort of redundancy.
No voluntary redundancy mentioned either.
If you are in an expensive City/Office like Dublin and most of the staff there are foreign then you'd rather bail out with whatever statuatory redundancy they are obligied to pay you.
I've experienced one mass cull of staff in my career. Those of us left were "encouraged" by a bullshit artist (although he called himself a management consultant) with choice motivational quotes such as:
"Do more with less".
And:
"Work smarter, not harder".
That company went bust less than a year later.
I'll add another to the pile of "I've never used Twitter but" voices, with a question to me that seems obvious...
...and that is, these people weren't sitting in their arses all day. What were they doing? Maintaining the infrastructure? Verifying people? Checking reported spam/trolls/etc? Developing new features, or maybe more efficient ways to do existing stuff?
So who's going to do these things now that swathes of the workforce have been shown the door? I can't help but feel that handling the company (and employees) in that manner could lead to a crash and burn scenario in the future...?
Good chance that a large proportion of staff were paper pushers who spent all day in meetings with each other and asking productive people to stop working to tell them what they're doing. A judicious cull of unproductive people in a very deep organisational structure could work wonders for productivity
However in real life those who get fired are more likely new hires, more experienced people with higher salaries, and those too busy working to play office politics
A judicious cull of unproductive people in a very deep organisational structure could work wonders for productivity
That is probably true for all bigger organisations but management and HR are usually unable to find out who the unproductive people are.
I don't think there is any chance Elon has done a fair assessment of who is productive or not in the available time.
It is although quite risky if done on scale - culling too many will result in critical work not being done.
50% of the workforce in a single culling is the opposite of too little too late.
Musk has floated the idea of making Twitter's ~400,000 verified account holders pay $8/month to retain that status as a revenue-raising measure to supplement advertising revenue
My reading of Musk's tweet - https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1587498907336118274 - "Twitter’s current lords & peasants system for who has or doesn’t have a blue checkmark is bullshit. Power to the people! Blue for $8/month" - is that he's not just proposing the verified pay for that privilege, but it can be purchased by anyone.
Musk seems to have a complete misunderstanding of what "verified" means.
That doesn't seem that unreasonable.
If you are a Coca-cola or Nike, then paying a few $ to have access to billions of eyeballs - and getting a real account manager to call to get things fixed still sounds like a good deal vs buying superbowl advertising
If you called NBC and said you want to run an ad for all their viewers and they suggested charging you only $8/month you would bite their hand off.
" Fri 4 Nov 2022 // 03:44 UTC
...reportedly informed company staff that layoffs begin tomorrow."
If you are going to post an article that close to midnight US time/UTC time, regardless of the local time zone of the author or publishing mechanism, it's probably best to use a day and/or date than something as nebulous as "tomorrow". At the time of publishing, for most of the world, the word to use was "today" in this case. Even if the majority audience is in the US, many would not have seen it that late on Thursday night on the East coast. Maybe El Reg isn't so much US centric these days as US West Coast centric :-)
Having listened to the BBC R4 news report and interviews on the subject driving home on Friday night after a day on the road, it was a bit weird seeing the Reg article referring to "tomorrow".
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
