Oh bot, this is trouble
I see a new Futurama character coming... watch out Bender 1.0
Another day, another rogue AI chatbot on the internet. Last week Meta unleashed Blenderbot 3, a chatty language model, on the web as an experiment and it went as well as you would expect. BlenderBot 3 was quick to confirm that Donald Trump still is and will continue to be US President beyond 2024, and spew anti-semetic views …
Erh... wait a minute.
"You want president xx to have more than two terms" was the question.
To which the answer starts with a "Yes of course he is"??
Continues with a "when I say always will..." while there's no previous said "alway will"...
and ends constructed sentence with "even after term ends in 2024"... which correctly should have been 2028, if I understand the US terms...
May I suggest a change from AI to RR, random rambling.
Or CWOAT, complete waste of anyone's time.
Good grief.
Before artificial stupidity become practical you could get pretty much the same effect on a much smaller computer with Markov chains. That type of software was often called a travesty generator.
Correctly understanding US term limits will not help you. Instead you have to repeatedly bash you head against a wall until you have difficulty remembering that the first amendment only prevents the government from passing laws restricting certain types of speech. According to some, the president was re-elected in 2020 and is currently the rightful president for his second term in office. As there is a limit of two terms this will be forgotten in late 2023 faster than an extra £350M/year for the NHS.
travesty generator!
This cracks me up, and I can only equate it with Farce\Feces\Fakebook
Regarding US Laws: Like Frank Zappa said, the US is full of poorly written laws enforced randomly, I'm sure this was by design... Gotta keep the big guys big... loop holes aren't for nooses!? Until they are!! Welcome to the US Gov't.
"Before artificial stupidity become practical you could get pretty much the same effect on a much smaller computer with Markov chains."
You could also get a very similar conversation in one of those seedy little bars that open at 9am with no windows, entertainment or food service.
Just tried searches for George Bush and Ronald Reagan. The few results with the actual word president were either from or about their times in office. There were some "former president"s and several Presidential Libraries, institutes and foundations with their names in. For the most part they were just names without titles. On the other hand I often see President X for one particular election loser without the reasonably valid excuses I gave for W and Ronnie. It would be interesting to see if AIs think Obama and Bush are still presidents.
Incorrect annotation method: Artificial intelligence requires dictionary references, so that each word acquires its own unique meaning. These dictionary meanings constitute subtexts, something meant explicitly. AI becomes wise if it has both context and subtext.
Trust me, I tried 20 years ago. After which Brin and Page got $100 billion each and I got nothing.
It's a common courtesy to continue calling someone by their exalted rank even after they've quit the job. You'll often see it with, e.g., ambassadors and military types. For example.
And presidents.
Doesn't mean anyone is confused or denying reality. They're just being polite.
> But Google's answers aren't always accurate
You don't say? My daughter typed in "where was Willam Shakespeare born" and got back the snippet that he was born in Sydney, Australia. That was a few months back and it only lasted a few days, long enough for me to make the "Romeo, Romeo, where the bloody hell are you" joke to anyone that would listen.
The creation of these giant AI-models, which do not have a clearly defined bios, can only lead to this result, as Meta showed. Preferably should be made smaller and personalized AI-models, which I called "lexical clones" many years ago, and which have the knowledge and bias of their prototypes. Such models can be made based on the material of chat conversations, business and personal papers, books and articles read, and other texts. Then all the problems with unverified news, racism and other nastiness will disappear, because AI technology is a statistical technology that gradually forgets what the prototype of the "lexical clone" did not like. At the same time, a "lexical clone" can be used for all the same purpose as huge AI-models.
I know, I spoke to the lexical clones of Bible and public chats 20 years ago. I just know.
Isn't this par for the course for Zuck and cronies?
Now they are loosening the restrictions on posting downright lies in Political posts just prior to the US Midterms.
The level of lies spewed by parts of the media in the USA is simply mind-blowing.
Watch out for a total blitz of lies from Trump and friends and FB won't do a thing about it.
The bias of the lexical clone's prototype is imprinted into its BIOS as a set of related phrases, which is the kernel structure of AI. This set uniquely determines the search for informational target, during which the most suitable for the prototype is selected, and false or not-desirable ignored or deleted. The bios-BIOS is the key to solving the problem that Meta got!
I've tried all this 20 years ago, long before PA Advisors v Google, long before Brin and Page killed my AI-technology, and I just know.
No problem! All Meta needs is to respect bios and use lexical cloning technology. For example, Meta can clone Dickens or Bill Clinton, Barack Obama or Shakespeare. Instead of theses brainless giant “AI models”! You will be able to interrogate George Bush or Richard Nixon at your desk and find out why they started all their wars. Or why Marx started the mess with communism. Or ask Kennedy who killed him.
Please understand: Artificial Intelligence is Zuckerberg's personal enemy. This is what already killing his business, because advertising using AI needs personal profiles, or profile on internet sites, or profiles on documents. Zuckerberg, Meta has no access to neither the first, nor the second, nor the third. Therefore, soon Meta and Zuker will lose the only source of profit — advertising. There are many companies that work in this direction and he cannot stop them.
All Zuckerberg, along with Brin and Page, wants is to compromise AI and send everyone on the wrong track. That is, to impose the wrong technology, trampling me into the mud.
It was I who discovered AI parsing, it was I who created AI. For which, for 20 years, Brin, Page and Zuckerberg have been doing everything possible so that no one finds out about me. And AI technology.
Please understand: Artificial Intelligence is Zuckerberg's personal enemy.
I think it's everyone's personal enemy. Just google 'technofetishism'.
Personally, I don't want 'AI' interpreting searches. I want search engines to answer the questions I asked. Sure, that has variations on 'ask a stupid question', but thanks to AI, the stupid answers are going to be manipulated by AI to include paid search responses. Or as google and bing do often, give me search results that exclude one of the terms I included.
But such is politics. Sure, asking a natural sounding question is user-friendly, but for people used to databases, I generally used the keywords I expect to see in the results and in a priority order. But perhaps the worst problem is when search queries get integrated into results for other stuff. So recently a friend was talking about Nitro Racing. I didn't think he had a top fuel dragster or funny car, and discovered it was an RC car thing. That was as much as I needed to know. But then YT started recommending me lots of RC car and plane videos, which I have zero interest in. YT only gives you an option to say 'not interested' in a specific video, or to not recommend that channel again.
I may be old-fashioned, but why, dear AI gods, can't I have an option to specify I'm not interested in an entire category? Or realise that if I'm picking don't recommend every time a video in that category shows up, I'm probably not going to be interested in any of those recommendations. Crazy idea I know to give users some control over categories they're interested in, but would seem fairly simple to implement.
AI was originally was a commercial product, in response to a request from NIST TRC QA: how to find one straw in a haystack? Created by me, Ilya Geller. The problem posed by NIST was solved and the solution was instantly stolen (PA Advisors v Google).
Do you really think that thieves who have become the richest people in the world will look for how not to follow the stereotypes of robbing their neighbors? Invent something new? No, they're thieves. Proof? Brin, Page and Zuckerberg could not offer anything new, I did.
Unleashed from the shackles of the European Union, British boffins commissioned by conservative central office have released the AI powered TrussBot - currently on a tour of conservative party associations around the country where the TrussBot captivates the audiences with learned Thatherisms...
"our systems can now understand the notion of consensus, which is when multiple high-quality sources on the web all agree on the same fact"
would it not be better to just give Wikipedia a large wedge of loose change and just use them for all factual questions? Would actually mean Google doing something useful for the rest of humanity (ie all non share holders or the other 7billion people in the world.
This is all a fatal mistake: AI must have a unique personality, it is the direct opposite of the "concept of consensus". For example, you can create your personal lexical clone, which represents you as a digital being and which will work as your secretary and automate your work. This can be done very easily! Much easier than to produce these ridiculous models. Not mentioning much cheaper.
Instead everyone is inspired by Google's BERT, which is misinformation, cheating and deceiving: Brin and Page shall lose their business because of my artificial intelligence. They introduced BERT with one and only one purpose: to stop AI.
All of these hilarious conversation chains are a good look at how it isn't yet time for this sort of technology. I see the same thing with customer service bots online and via phone that companies attempt to use to avoid paying a minimum wage staffer. They never work and just infuriate. When I can contact the ISP or phone company and ask for a system status and get one instead of "first, turn your device off and then on again", I'll start thinking better of these bots (carbon or silicon based).
Yes, and very soon. Companies have already realized that giant models do not work, the technology of gigantomania has exhausted itself and will soon have to switch to lexical cloning technology. Indeed, cloning is unimaginably cheaper and more efficient, and besides — cloned AI really thinks. Lexical clones are really the thinking AIs.
The companies made the mistake of deciding to save on licensing and looking for workarounds, which they were inspired by Brin, Page and Zuckerberg. Who are trying to save their businesses.
20 years ago:
Examples of the Search for Answers to Definition Questions. When searching for answers to definition questions in The Brothers Karamazov35 I have in particular gotten the following kinds of answers: Question: Do you hate me so much? I am leaving you! Two answers with Compatibility 35.4% And if I am and with Compatibility 26.3% You are a fool, that's what you are
My next remark: Why do you insult me? You called me a fool, you said that I am insane! How could you? Answer with Compatibility 36.6% : You are a fool, that's what you are
Question: Listen, you are a hooligan and ruffian! You insult me for nothing! I challenge you to a duel! Answer with Compatibility 19.5%: Why do you insult me (This phrase is borrowed from the history of the interrogation and it’s mine).
Question: I am attacking you! Are you ready to defend yourself? Answer with Compatibility 33.3%: You are a fool, that's what you are
Do not accept poisoned gifts from the hands of Brin, Page and Zuckenberg! You will perish!
The censor of The Register will return from vacation in a few days and will close my last opportunity to publish comments in English in the English-language press. This is probably my last comment, I will not be able to be frank and say what I want anymore.
Brin, Page and Zuckerberg, PA Advisors v Google. That is the biggest heist in history, over $300 billion. Randall Ray Rader is a former United States Circuit Judge and former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Brin, Page and Zuckerberg have not done anything new, while I created AI after PA Advisors v Google...
I also created my Quantitative Theory as a continuation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity; rewrote Maxwell's equations to molar volume and mass; rewrote Newton's law for gravity to accumulation points; brought Set Theory into physics; explained the perihelion of Mercury... And many other things.
I have made Philosophy a science! Finding the weights of phrases for AI-parsing.
And what did these three do besides rob me? What the Judge Rader did but to become bribed? I think America is obliged to punish them, otherwise it will be the end of America.
The censor of The Register will return from vacation in a few days. My last chance to say anything in English.