South Korea's lunar orbiter launches and phones home happily South Korea's first lunar orbiter, which is about to test disruption-tolerant, network-based space communications, successfully made contact with its Australian ground station after launching on Thursday. According to South Korea's Ministry of Science, Technology, Information and Communications, the Korea Pathfinder Lunar …
If hydrogen and oxygen *can't* be found in ice, no matter where it is, I'd be a little suspicious of either (a) the initial identification of the 'ice' as ice, or (b) the ability of the analyst.
(yes, I know it doesn't actually specify 'water ice' but that is the normative form of the word...)
Presumably from 100km the detection of ice is going to be spectral.
So they ought to be able to get a fairly sure estimation of composition and grain size if the target is fairly pure water ice. If it's very dirty then other signatures might mask and make it more uncertain especially as there is already hydrogen in the moon's tenuous atmosphere.
If the moon gets a lot of radiation, maybe during a solar event then radiolytic processing of ice can release oxygen molecules.
I'm wondering whether what they are talking about here is actually the detection of molecular hydrogen and/or oxygen within the matrix of the ice, in other words, tiny bubbles of H2 and O2. I'm guessing they're not looking for neutral atoms of H. or O. because those would be highly reactive, and therefore only likely to be found in interstellar space, and also because neutral hydrogen atoms have a tendency towards weird quantum effects like tunnelling (the reason chemists often refer to the H+ ion as a proton, because that's what it is).
IMHO it would be more useful for South Korea to develop their own nuclear capability. Having a nuclear armed Northern neighbor who's intent on destroying you might be a good incentive.
They're dancing on the volcano. All this technical wizardry isn't worth sh*t if you don't have safety and security.
Yeah, 'cause that's exactly what the world needs right now. More nukes. Brilliant.
</sarc> in case it's not obvious.
If their nuclear armed northern neighbour were truly intent on destroying them, and not just talking it up to make themselves feel good, why haven't they already done so? Friendship with China and Russia mean no one is likely to nuke them back. So what's stopping them?
The obvious answer is they just want a big stick so they can play with the big boys. They don't actually want to use it any more than we do.
"If you like, but I can't really do any harm here. If I decide to flex my military muscles I will just get laughed at."
Flex away my friend, my comment was originally (snidely, admittedly) aimed at StrangerHereMyself and their odd "Everyone Should Have Nukes" fetish.
Context is always relevant.
Their main intent is to prevent the U.S. from barging in and instigating a "regime change" (one of most U.S. Administrations' favorite word).
However, using nukes to dissuade the U.S. from interfering when they invade the South is certainly in the cards. South Korea is already contemplating whether to develop its own nukes as they aren't entirely sure the U.S. will want to risk its cities becoming burning embers when Rocket Man invades.
I would think that somewhere inside the security apparatus of SK lurks a plan - albeit perhaps not one that is actually written down - that could take their existing peaceful nuclear expertise to a weaponised one in a reasonably short time. But I also imagine that implementing such a thing is not something SK actually thinks would be necessarily helpful, ...
"Reasonable short time" isn't sufficient considering the invading force is at less than 50km from your capital city.
They need nukes NOW and quite a few of them, not some plan to cobble together a crude device. They need time to develop and to field these weapons and the means to deliver them.
How about a hundred nuke warheads sitting on top of solid-fueled missiles ready to fire at a moment's notice? If Kim so much as twitches Pyongyang disappears in a mushroom cloud.
You are Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper AICMFP.
The fact that they were making very successful farces based on the consequences of your sort of arguments in the 1960s might highlight a flaw or two in your otherwise excellent plans...
Mind you North Korea already *has* nukes and missiles to deliver them.
This is not about MAD as practiced in the Cold War. This is an one-upmanship where one side is betting the Big Power will not intervene if they threaten to incinerate some of its cities.
I'm merely suggesting to even the odds by letting South Korea be in control of its own fate.
Nuking your next-door-neighbour is the international-politics version of shitting on your own doorstep. Also, you don't need ICBMs to do what can be done with a truck.
Oh, and South Korea are a signatory to the NPT as well, so if they broke that they'd get sanctioned which would bugger their domestic nuclear power programme, so your suggestion is all kinds of stupid.
Who cares if they're a signatory to the NPT? They can always withdraw, and considering it's their existence at stake I suppose they wouldn't think twice about doing so.
Also, they don't need to use their nukes, just have them as an insurance to dissuade the North from invading.
If you don't have security you're left holding the bag.
Being a signatory to the NPT brings all sorts of benefits other than the obvious one of not having to handle and maintain nuclear warheads. I suggest you read up on the "demon core" for an example of how nasty they can be.
For example, if they were to withdraw from the NPT, they would immediately stop getting assistance with their domestic nuclear power programme. They would almost certainly get embargoes on certain technologies associated with such, as well as the raw materials.
Politically, it'd be a really stupid move as well, as it would estrange them from the US, which would directly lead to them being MORE likely to get attacked by The North.
"Nuking your next-door-neighbour is the international-politics version of shitting on your own doorstep."
It's worse than that. As far as Korea (both of them) is concerned, it's not a next-door neighbour involved but rather a part of their own country. Nuclear annihilation is probably not a great way to implement reunification. I mean, war in general isn't the greatest either, but at least the winner tends to be left with a bit more than just an uninhabitable radioactive wasteland at the end.
My thoughts exactly.
Meanwhile in pedants' corner I assume we must be talking about a polar or near polar orbit. if so which pole will they be photographing? The article refers to the pole's craters (pole's = singular possesive). Apparently there are two poles on the Moon so should it not refer to the poles' craters (plural possive)?
I don't have a coat because it is too warm but I'm leaving anyway.
Yeah it's poles, not pole. And the ShadowCam is just a super sensitive camera:
http://shadowcam.sese.asu.edu/about
Don't forget to drop an email to corrections@theregister.co.uk, please, if you spot anything wrong or weird, so we can fix it right away.
C.
"when latency or interruptions occur, the system advises network resources that packets are still being transmitted but have been delayed and will arrive as soon as possible"
US Postal Service... your package is delayed and as soon as it is recovered it will arrive as soon as possible.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
