back to article Now-frozen crypto-lending biz Celsius accused of devolving into a Ponzi scheme

An ex-employee of Celsius Network, the cryptocurrency lending platform that recently suspended all transactions, this week accused the company of operating as a Ponzi scheme in a lawsuit. Netizens were told they could earn interest on cryptocurrencies they put into Celsius. The biz generated that return by investing people's …

  1. Mayday
    Holmes

    Wow. What a surprise.

    Crypto “investments” revealed to be a Ponzi Scheme.

  2. JDPower666

    Devolving INTO a ponzi scheme?!

    1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Yes, that point struck me as well. I suppose someone was feeling charitable.

      1. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

        Not all fraud and foolishness is a Ponzi scheme. The alleged series of events describes precisely what happened. It started as a bad idea, then became a Ponzi scheme when the bad idea was no longer sustainable.

        A Ponzi scheme requires paying investors from the contributions of other investors rather than the proceeds of the investment. That's the specific distinguishing feature of a Ponzi scheme. Calling every cryptocurrency fraud and bubble "a Ponzi scheme" is inaccurate and does no one any good.

    2. Plest Silver badge
      Happy

      Yep, oh look a bear with a bog roll under his arm heading into that patch of trees.

    3. Strahd Ivarius Silver badge

      it becomes a Ponzi scheme ONLY when the plaintiff loses money...

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        T'other way around. The plaintiff loses money because it's a Ponzi scheme.

        It's like a mousetrap. A mousetrap doesn't become a mousetrap when it snaps, it snaps because it's a mousetrap.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          The way I read his comment is that nobody complains about Ponzi schemes while they're still making money off them but only once their turn arrives.

          1. sketharaman

            True dat. According to studies, the first one-third of investors in Ponzi Scheme do get their promised high returns. I surely don't seem them complaining.

    4. Oglethorpe

      A Ponzi scheme requires falsification of profits. Common or Garden cryptocurrency isn't a Ponzi scheme because it's transparent.

  3. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

    That's a very charitable assessment

    Assuming it wasn't a scam from the very start

  4. bofh1961

    A strange business model anyway

    Putting existing crypto investments into a pooled fund, which is then invested in more crypto? The whole point of crypto is that it's a gamble - the investors in this scheme are basically paying someone else to go to the casino on their behalf. I really don't understand this one.

    1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Re: A strange business model anyway

      " I really don't understand this one."

      I'm sure you do understand it. OTOH the entire operation seems to have depended on a ready supply of people who didn't and were prepared to back their lack of understanding with cash.

      1. Blank Reg

        Re: A strange business model anyway

        All crypto relies on a steady supply of people who lack understanding, AKA suckers

        1. Plest Silver badge

          Re: A strange business model anyway

          Yep, Gen-Z typpes desperate to avoid having to work until their 70s like previous generations, gambling their money on ponzi schemes and magic beans in the hopes of never having to work a day in their lives at all if possible.

          1. jotheberlock

            Re: A strange business model anyway

            You what? Most of the Boomers I know got to take early retirement, state retirement age used to be in the early 60s, it's us younger people who are going to have to work themselves into a grave.

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: A strange business model anyway

          That is not true depending on what people think cryptocurrencies are.

          I use cryptocurrencies as a means of anonymous payment. I have a balance of about £100 (a bit more a while ago but I don't keep that as an investment - it's the crypto equivalent of a jar full of loose change.

          If you want to pay anonymously, BTC does what it says on the tin. If you want to get rich through cryptocurrencies as an investment, you are indeed a sucker just like all get rich quick schemes.

      2. a pressbutton

        Re: A strange business model anyway

        "I'm sure you do understand it. OTOH the entire operation seems to have depended on a ready supply of people who didn't and were prepared to back their lack of understanding with cash."

        Most people do not understand that cash is only worth what you can exchange it for.

        Happily almost no-one says "no, I want a kilo of jam" when offered £3.

        Most people do not understand that crypto is only worth what you can exchange it for.

        Unfortunately some people want more a lot $crypto when offered £3.

        Trustless was not supposed to be interpreted like that but that is humanity for you.

      3. teknopaul

        Re: A strange business model anyway

        Re " I really don't understand this one."

        Stable coins are the best scam. It works like this...

        You give me that 100€ note and I give you a token that I try really hard to make sure is still worth 100€ in a few years. If all goes well your token is worth 100€, if not you lose all your money.

        Its algorithmic. And AI. And crypto.

        1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: A strange business model anyway

          And trustless.

    2. Howard Sway Silver badge

      Re: basically paying someone else to go to the casino on their behalf

      That's not a strange business model, it's called an investment fund.

      The fact that the crypto bubble got so big that it enabled a huge ecosystem of investment funds, currency exchanges and "financial journalism" to flourish around it is going to make the terminal crash all the more painful. The only thing they really invested in was electricity, which they then proceeded to burn calculating meaningless numbers on expensive graphics cards.

      Cross your fingers if you invested in a pension fund that was "high risk" and they were stupid enough to pour your savings into any of this.

      1. teknopaul

        Re: basically paying someone else to go to the casino on their behalf

        It's an investment fund that invests exclusivly in tulips and takes payments exclusively in tulips and returns funds in dried out un watered tulips.

        Real investment funds take money in and invest in real businessss that solve real problems for real people and pay back a share of the real benefits that actually happened in the real world.

        1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: basically paying someone else to go to the casino on their behalf

          "that solve real problems for real people"

          Real people who pay real money to have them solved. That's the crucial bit.

        2. James Anderson

          Re: basically paying someone else to go to the casino on their behalf

          Invest in real businesses that solve real problems. Yes they used to do that up to about 1959.

        3. doublelayer Silver badge

          Re: basically paying someone else to go to the casino on their behalf

          "Real investment funds take money in and invest in real businessss that solve real problems for real people and pay back a share of the real benefits that actually happened in the real world."

          Which depends on what you consider real benefits. If, for example, you don't like this concept (separate from the Ponzi scheme part which nobody likes), you might not like investment funds that invest in financial companies that themselves are trading. Yet those exist. Similarly, there are investment funds that invest in commodities of various types, and you make money if copper becomes more valuable. They're not investing in companies mining or processing the copper, just the copper. Do you object to those? Investors aren't limited to stocks and bonds and companies aren't limited to "solving real problems".

          This fund sounds very dodgy, and possibly it always has been. Even if it started out without that plan, it doesn't seem to have taken long to go very badly. The concept is still that of an investment fund.

        4. TimMaher Silver badge
          Coat

          Re: “tulips”

          Thanks, yet again, to Douglas Adams.

          The management consultant:- “Since we decided a few weeks ago to adopt the leaf as legal tender, we have, of course, all become immensely rich.”

          Fabulous.

          Mine has a copy of “The Restaurant at the End of the Universe” in the pocket.

  5. Surrey Veteran

    Lending ….

    So if anyone remembers the big economic crisis of 2008 the guilty bit was the derivatives, an asset composed of prime and sub prime debt that nobody seems to understand the risk, but as long as had two digits returns everybody was happy, until it burst.

    Pretty much Celsius created the same, you borrow backed by more estable coins and trade at a margin more risky crypto assets, except that opposite to the formal financial industry on which arbitration and regulations are in place nothing like that exist in the crypto world. Not to mention the risk of trading at a margin, specially when the lender starts doing margin calls because of the risk of default, you can by en debt in no time.

    DeFI is criminally stupid plus the total lack of security made it a picnic for hackers, these people needs to end in jail.

    1. Plest Silver badge

      Re: Lending ….

      Suckers and money soon parted, nasty life lessons learned the hard way and promises of instant riches up in smoke with nothing but the reminder of the classic phrase "If it's too good to be true...".

      1. iron Silver badge

        Re: Lending ….

        > nasty life lessons learned the hard way

        Unfortunately (for them) the crypto bros don't seem to be capable of learning lessons, nasty or otherwise. They're more likely to hodl until their diamond hands turn into charcoal.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Lending ….

          I'm not sure you've got that completely right. The crypto bros are the scammers, the HODLers are the suckers the crypto bros expect to hold the useless 'coins' once the crypto bros have walked off with the HODLers real dollars/euros/yen etc.

          1. Surrey Veteran

            Re: Lending

            On top of that is a cottage industry of “investment gurus”, special software to analyse the market and of course the wallet apps that happily takes a cut of commission when selling / buying.

            And of course the brain washed drones repeating ad-Infinitum that is all lies because the governments are slaves of the financial institutions and they don’t want you to move the money away,

            1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

              Re: Lending

              "and of course the wallet apps"

              Which sometimes turn out to be mysteriously empty.

      2. Hooda Thunkett

        Re: Lending ….

        It's a classic scam "only on a computer."

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "Devolving into?"

    Sorry, but ALL crypto investments are scams and Ponzi schemes from what I've been reading over the years. I have yet to read of one that wasn't.

    1. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

      The creation of a very small number of the first of them (low single figures) can be attributed to naivety on the part of the creator(s). One was even originally a joke.

      The other several thousand were/are indeed scams, or otherwise designed to make the creators rich, from the start.

      1. TimMaher Silver badge
        Windows

        Re: First of them.

        Yup. I started mining back in two thousand and “cough”.

        It looked hopeful but became boring and was trashing my GPU.

        So I stopped.

        I still have my wallet lurking in an image somewhere that I suppose I could revive if I can remember which drive it is on.

        In the meantime and in the case of Celsius I only have this to say:

        “Hah, hah, hah, hah, haaaah!”

        Bloody idiots.

  7. Plest Silver badge
    Facepalm

    Reap what you sow...

    Let me sum up some of Gen-Z idea's about wealth generation....

    "So there's a great way I can invest my real money to make free currency that's worthless, in the hopes of never having to work after the age of 25? All I have to do is buy these "magic coins" that rooms full of GPUs have 'pulled out of their arses' by way of months spent scanning a stream of meaningless data? There's huge risk, huge cost and probably no liklihood of ever seeing my money again? Well sign me up!!"

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Reap what you sow...

      Plest,

      "...There's huge risk, huge cost and probably no liklihood of ever seeing my money again? Well sign me up!!"

      I think you oversold it slightly .... it isn't quite that good :)

    2. teknopaul

      Re: Reap what you sow...

      And it's called "Proof of work"

    3. doublelayer Silver badge

      Re: Reap what you sow...

      You pretty much nailed the description, but there are two problems. It's not just young people doing this, and it's not new. Yeah, the term now is cryptocurrency, but people have been hoping to get rich quick and throwing away their money and time on schemes they thought would get them there for centuries. This will eventually die, those who invested will learn a painful lesson and go back to work, another generation will form, and a new thing will come along that's clearly going to change the world and make you rich in the process. Some of those things will change the world, but they won't make many people as rich as they thought it would.

  8. scrubber
    Windows

    Interesting Model

    So they lost if the market rose and lost if the market fell?

  9. GraXXoR

    A (former?) colleague of mine…

    Asked me what I thought about crypto last year.

    I told him I thought it was basically a Ponziesque bubble with zero intrinsic value that was about to burst and that any people attempting to enter now (arse end of 2021) would likely be entering at the top.

    He said a subdued “thank you” and that was the last I ever heard from him.

    I found out from his Facebook page a few days later the reason why he’d asked was that he’d just pumped $20k into a mining rig which he was still waiting for.

    Now you’ve made me wonder how that all turned out.

    Oh damn I quit Facebook last year, too, so I guess I’ll never know.

    1. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

      Re: A (former?) colleague of mine…

      I was asked the same thing during the last bubble a few years ago, but gave a borderline tactless explanation of greater fool theory that probably sounded like a personal insult. Whoops.

      If you value someone's friendship, you have to be very careful how you give them even solicited financial advice. It's basically a lose/lose situation when it comes to volatile speculative gambling like cryptocurrencies.

      1. Howard Sway Silver badge

        Re: A (former?) colleague of mine…

        The only advice on investments you should ever give to friends is that if you can't afford to lose all of it, you can't afford to invest it. If they can afford it, it's their responsibility to look for and choose good opportunities and make their own decisions, same as with everything else in life.

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    I'm a successful crypto investor

    I spent £20 on BTC back in 2010 when they were emerging as research. That's the entire limit of my investment.

    My advice at the time - and since - has been to forget about crypto as an investment vehicle, coz it ain't.

    Meanwhile the development of the blockchain is far more interesting.

    1. johnfbw

      Re: I'm a successful crypto investor

      So you quit after the first quarter billion Euros?

  11. Potemkine! Silver badge
    Megaphone

    Lovely scam! Wonderful scam!

    Lovely scam! Wonderful scam

    Sca-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-am

    Sca-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-am

    SCA-A-A-A-A-A-A-AM

    SCA-A-A-A-A-A-A-AM

    LOVELY SCAM

    LOVELY SCAM

    LOVELY SCAM

    LOVELY SCAM

    LOVELY SCA-A-A-A-AM

    SCA-AM

    SCA-AM

    SCA-AM

    SCA-A-A-AM!

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    History doesn't repeat itself

    But I recall in the dotcom boom people going on about "the normal rules (of finance) don't apply anymore".

    So it does rhyme

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like