New York to get first right-to-repair law for electronics Right-to-repair advocates are applauding the passage of New York's Digital Fair Repair Act, which state assembly members approved Friday in a 145–1 vote. The law bill, previously green-lit by the state senate in a 49-14 vote, now awaits the expected signature of New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D). Assuming the New York bill …
it's simple: This is not a right-to-repair bill, it was hijacked to become a deny-any-repair bill.
Please read the actual version of the law that was passed (A7006B) and not the one linked by TheRegister ( S4104 )
...S4104 is the initially proposed version, before it was nuked by ammendment "B" - yes.. the "B" version is important here.
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/A7006/amendment/b
This new version "B" law is what was actually voted by the Assembly and it excludes practically all electronic devices - they use the language "INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO" when listing appliances (copy pasted text there, my caps lock is not stuck)
And under federal US law an "appliance" can be practically ANY device used in a home.
Laptops? LED TVs? they can be perfectly described as "appliances" because they fit the federal definition of what an "appliance" is:
24 CFR § 3280.802 - Definitions
(i) Appliance means utilization equipment, generally other than industrial, normally built in standardized sizes or types, which is installed or connected as a unit to perform one or more functions [...]
The right to repair is a legal thing.
They'll sell you parts and info at a fair price....
Doesn't mean the thing is practically repairable...
You really think you can replace that M1-Ultra? and have it work? For how long? And how much is that M1-Ultra? Purchased in thousands, it's probably sorta OK - but thousands will cost quite a substantial sum, but one by one to an individual?
Yes, it's a legal thing but if it is in any way effective it will limit what companies can produce, or at least sell. The trick is to get the balance right so that measures intended to limit reparability (like, say, welding the case shut) are banned but design features that are intended to improve the product (like welding the case shut) aren't. You see the problem. I'm no lawyer, and obviously I haven't read the New York law, so I can say how well (or even if) it addresses this but it something that right to repair laws need to do.
There will likely be some more forward thinking manufactures who already deal with similar legislation in other markets and there will be others who will adhere strictly to the letter of law, ignore the spirit and make it as difficult/expensive as possible for the end-user to get an out of warranty repair. My general sense is that US based companies will most likely be in the latter category.
Replacing that M1-Ultra may be somewhat more difficult, but achievable by an experienced repair place. As you say, buying a new chip may render the repair non-economical, and you'll likely be waiting 3 or 4 months for delivery (in an ideal world, more than likely you'll be at the back of the queue and only get shipped the chip when they've started manufacturing and shipping the M2).
That's by far not the only chip on the motherboard, most of them are likely a few to a few 10s of dollars so easily affordable for replacement. The problem comes when they are 'special' variants of a mostly standard part which the manufactures have a contract with Apple to sell to Apple only, and so not available on the open market. Need a $10 part replacing on your motherboard? Only way right now is to find a donor board to pull it off.
Except some manufacturers make it so that doesn't work for more important parts.
Was it Apple that had it so the phone checks the serial number of the camera? So if you replace the camera it will not work because it's a not the original camera. All fixable in an Apple approved repair shop because they have the software/equipment to re-pair the camera to the rest of the phone.
I expect footdragging, passive-aggressive, fake-cooperation from the manufacturers.
Manufacturer: "Here's the repair manual!". End-user: "There's no table of contents, no index, and some diagrams of what appear to be a completely different product." Mfr.: "So sorry, that'll be fixed in the next release." Three (or seven, or thirteen months later ...) "Rev 1.1 manual is now out!" End-user: "The TOC and index are here, but are mostly-wrong. Some diagrams are missing, and some part numbers look wrong." Mfr.: "So sorry, we'll fix that in the next release." Ad infinitum.
Meanwhile, the manufacturer crows, "Look, Mr/Ms Regulator: we're complying! See our website! Everything you need is here!"
(Icon for mfr. proclaiming "compliance".)
Many "manufacturers" don't even have schematics when they "design" their products to be made in china.
For instance, Chinese fab will send a list of modules they have and you can ask for slight modifications like board shape, placement of connectors, buttons etc. They'll make you a few samples and if you are happy you just order whatever quantity you need. But you don't get schematics.
The reason is that you can't copyright schematics. Nothing would stop you from taking a small order and then taking the design to a cheaper fab.
I mean it's not a rocket science to spin up your own boards anyway - most designs don't stray away from what is in datasheets anyway, but there is not many people that can actually do this, because we killed that industry.
Another real problem that I and I imagine most folks who try to repair their stuff run into from time to time is repair parts that are on the parts diagram, have a part number, maybe even have a price published, but aren't available. And that isn't necessarily the result of malice. My understanding is that what happens is that when specialized parts for machines are made or ordered from a supplier, a certain number of spares are made/ordered. After the parts are made, the tooling is reconfigured for the next order. Those extra parts are the repair parts. Ideally, there are just enough of them that the parts bin is empty when the last device in service is scrapped many years in the future. But no one is smart enough to guess the exact number of spares that will be needed for the next X years. And tooling up to make more spares would be expensive so it doesn't often happen. So sometimes you need to cobble together a substitute or find a used part.
Maybe someday in a better world, 3d printing will solve this problem. But 3d printers that can make a wide variety of parts on demand at reasonable unit cost probably are a good many decades away.
Can't we go back to the 80s. My mums work friends husband came round to take a look at the TV in the backroom that had stopped working. He opened the back to take a look and there on the back case was the schematics for the TV. He traced what he needed to, soldered what needed soldering and now we had a working TV again.
The other day I pulled out our washing machine, cheap Chinese brand I believe. The filter door was jammed so I couldn't clean out the filter. Looked up on YouTube and thankfully someone had done videos on other brands which allowed me to work out how to partly strip it to get to the filter. No amount of searching was revealing a service manual. No, they just want you to land fill the washing machine and buy the latest. Eventually I managed to get my way to the door, unjam it and now its all fine again. Saved me having to pay an engineer who I couldn't afford or buying a new machine.
"and binning them produces a lot of waste."
Yes...but 95% easily recyclable! ie, it's mainly metal and some plastics. It might have more electronics than a phone which are not easily recyclable, but it's still only a tiny amount of the whole unit. If more can be recycled, then it must be good, yes? Just ignore the 5-10x more e-waste than a phone. </sarc>
To TVs made with a bunch of discrete parts so they come inside a big cabinet that's treated as furniture?
If every chip was socketed, every resistor and capacitor large enough that you could remove/replace it with a standard soldering iron, not only would that TV cost much more it would be more prone to failure (i.e. heat cycling slowly pushing chips out of sockets)
They didn't change the way they made things as part of a secret strategy to prevent repairs. They did it because it was cheaper and more reliable.
This is why you buy a decent brand, mostly because they do provide repairability manuals for their engineers which inevitably end up on t'Internet at something like repairmanual.com. Indesit are part of the mega-conglomerate Whirlpool, but I was able to find manuals for replacing a) the door handle for my washer (badly designed and easily broken off if you forget it has a 5-minute post-wash lock), and b) the draining impeller pump (turns out the impeller head just needed glueing back in for mine). Youtube and Google are in this case absolute lifesavers because I'll be damned if I had to throw out my 20-year-old washer purely because a plastic part either broke or got detached. £30 on eBay and Bob was my uncle. :-)
Most of the comments above seem to refer to at-home repairs. The real goal is that competent independent back-street and mobile repairers should be able to get schematics, parts and info to be able to repair stuff. Too much emphasis on home repairing and how long before the first home repair disaster/explosion/fire is in the media? Story heavily promoted by the relevant industry of course.
Good point, particularly with so much stuff having Lithium based batteries in them nowadays - as Big Clive on YouTube has demonstrated, those can get quite hot and fiery.
For non-battery powered stuff, I'm actually in a minority of people who doesn't mind wall warts versus built in power supplies. Replacing a wall wart is typically a lot easier than getting a replacement transformer for an internal power supply, and means less likelihood of dangerous voltages inside a device.
And is generally done for the very practical reason that it's much simpler and easier to choose and supply an external already type-approved power supply than it is to do the necessary certification and testing regime for each country into which you might like to sell - internal mains power supplies are a bad idea for all sorts of reasons.
A definite case of 'someone else's problem', and a generally good solution, as well as for the practical reasons you mention.
<quote>For non-battery powered stuff, I'm actually in a minority of people who doesn't mind wall warts versus built in power supplies.</quote>
But the wall-warts wouldn't be nearly as irritating of the "warts" weren't *at the wall*. A lot more usage of standard IEC C7/C8 would be preferable (and a bog-standard part readily procured by the manufacturer in bulk, and readily replaced at the consumer end).
Car makers have a problem. Car dealers don't make money on new sales, they make it all on servicing and trade-ins. Electric cars don't need servicing,
Traditional car makers need a way of locking you into their dealer network permanently.
So arrange that the software is only available to dealers, and the license to the software in your car doesn't transfer with the car.
You now have a choice. Trade in your car to the dealer to buy this years model - or try and sell a used car that can't start because the engine management software is locked because it didn't get a 'security' update.
So you're saying EVs don't have brakes, suspension, steering, hydraulics, coolant, aircon, tyres, perishable rubber components, bearings, things that need annual lubrication?
Pretty sure there are still plenty of things to service. Sure there's no engine, no exhaust, sometimes no gearbox. But now there's loads more sensitive electronics and electrically driven pumps. Plenty still to go wrong.
Agree with your other points.
With similar regulations in the works. We don’t import that many vehicles and appliances (from the US) but millions of digital devices (grom US companies) it’s becoming worthwhile for manufacturers to offer at least some level of repairability. Which is good for everybody.
It's a start. Ever had to get a CPU board for a washing machine?
A standardised, simple embedded controller with I/o interface would go a long way. Would not be at all difficult to create, though of course everyone would want to sell their version.
Maybe there's space in this world for a DIY appliance toolkit? Just as we build our own PCs. I mean is it that far a cry from Arduino to do it?
Why the hell are we talking about the US on this English website? Non of this applies here, and the English are too stupid to allow it. Safety comes first and foremost. Don't forget that the CGI Lurpak man on a skateboard wore a helmet in case he fell and got hurt. I'm honestly ashamed.
A précis is: How can I change my oil filter on my 2022 Mazda 6? How do I change my HV light bulbs without being killed? I can't because the service manual is secret. Get that done Boris, or would you rather have your flat re-redecorated courtesy of Ford?
1. The Register is international in scope and even has offices in the US an AUS.
2. Here in the UK, there is already Right To Repair legislation, 2 year warranties, a sliding scale of rights on items with an "expected lifetime" that includes some parts and labour outside of the normal warranty and some very good consumer rights.
3. Sometimes it's good to see how parts of the world compare with other parts.
4. US sometimes has an impact on east pondians
A lot of big companies have their head quarters in the US but sell the same product all over the world. If a local law in one of their core markets forces them to give out information and parts to repair the kit it can have a world wide impact.
Agreed. Which is why the industry is so desperate to resist these new laws in the US, as that would give real teeth to how they have to engage with independent repairers. I think East Pondian laws aren’t good enough to make manufacturers design for repair and sell spare parts. US laws / court enforcement mandating could get across that line.
The US has legislation dating back to the 70's (?) where car manufacturers are obliged to make available technical information enabling independent repair shops service cars. For instance, Bentley Publishers make excellent repair manuals for several brands of cars, covering everything from engine service to repairing door locks.
Once spare parts, manuals etc are available in New York for the equipment covered by the right to repair law, European shops will be able to buy these through US resellers. Manufacturers have a little loophole there, since they could start making US specific models.
Europe will lag behind since the EU commission in Brussels fulfills all the formal criteria of a fascist state, being a collusion of powerful national industry interests, appointed politicians and a tightly controlled press, who have no obligations towards voters. Unlike the USA Europe does not even have legal path ways allowing consumers to enforce creation of legislation that would enforce right to repair, we all live by the good grace of her Highness Empress von der Leyen. It is strange people have to buy manuals in the USA to repair their German made beamer, but that is how life is in a fascist state. Not being part of the EU, creative entrepreneurs in England could maybe make a buck selling services and goods to repair shops on the continent.
Downvoted, because of the unfounded comments about the EU commission. Also, regardless of the strength of your feelings, calling them fascist is a bit over the top, especially given that in the last UK general election, more people voted for political parties that wanted to either remain in the EU or have a second referendum than for parties that wanted the hard Brexit that we got. I therefore wouldn't say we had a perfectly functioning democracy in the UK right now. Pot calling kettle black?
BTW, have you heard of the European working time directive? Not everything that comes out of the EU commission is bad.
Well Done To Louis Rossman and his Lobbyists as well as His Multimillionaire and other Backers who have invested heavily to turn the tide against disposable electronics.
If you are not aware Rossman Repair Group have YouTube channels promoting live repairs to various Apple products and his Rants about NYC property prices and the upcoming resetting of the broken financial system which promotes sitting on property in debt and charging excessively unreasonable rents.
At the moment some of RRG are on holiday in Florida. So a bit short on the very popular cat videos.
You are going about this the wrong way. Apple is abusive to it's customers, so boycott them. I have boycotted them even long before this right to repair thing was a thing. In fact, my company gave me an iPhone for business use, for free, and I made them replace it with another manufacturer, I will NOT use any apple device for any reason.
In the 15 minutes I had my iPhone, I tried to install a 2-factor device, the very first thing I did with it. And I was told I could not, as it was an approved by Apple device.
F- YOU apple. I hate you, and I hate your products. Bye.
If these are the best politicans money can buy I'd hate to see what the cheap ones are like.
Though in all fairness good on them for passing this - would have preferred a version that didn't have exceptions and holes you could sail a freighter full of dodgy electronics from China through, but it's far better than nothing.
I really do wish they'd omitted the car exception - the current federal repair laws on the books don't really apply to EVs and the dealers on this side of the pond only rise to "mostly terrible" in rare and blessed occasions. Some competition in that arena would be nice.
It seems a way around a law like this would be to require users to license their hardware/phone instead of owning it, similar to the software model. Even worse, a monthly subscription. The manufacturers could end-of-life the product at any time.
Maybe I should delete this comment and not give them any ideas.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
