back to article French telco tycoon Patrick Drahi ups Altice UK's stake in BT to 18%, says he is not planning a takeover... at least not yet

Billionaire telco tycoon Patrick Drahi has upped his stake in BT to 18 per cent but says he is not intending – at least not yet – to launch a full-blown bid to buy the business, a move the UK government warned it may thwart anyway. In June, Drahi's Altice UK wolfed down a 12.1 per cent stake in BT for £2bn, with the exec …

  1. John Robson Silver badge

    Will not hesitate to protect our executive positions when we leave parliament...

    1. NoneSuch Silver badge
      Holmes

      "The government is committed to levelling up the country through digital infrastructure, and will not hesitate to act if required to protect our critical national telecoms infrastructure."

      BT is barely beyond the telegraph level of hardware. It needs a lot of investment and modernization to stay competitive.

      Patrick should invest in a direct BT competitor and leave full government control over the sinking ship in UK Gov hands.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      We will not hesistate to sell BT - and anything else that hasn't been hocked yet - to our Bullingdon Club chums and other Conservative party donors.

  2. Warm Braw

    To act if required to protect our critical national telecoms infrastructure

    Government's previous "action" seemed to involved bunging cash to BT to enable it to continue dragging its feet. Fills you with confidence.

  3. Persona

    Copper

    He doesn't need to do a take over. It's a long term investment. BT has a fortune of copper in its network that is not reflected in its share price. It can't get to it because it's in use and the cost of extracting just the unused bits is too high. As the planned roll out of fiber for areas completes they will be able to pull out vast amounts of copper with little risk of service interruptions. Copper recovery will become a big money spinner. The copper free network whilst expensive to install will be much more reliable and so less costly to maintain.

    1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Re: Copper

      "The copper free network ... will be much more reliable"

      Right up to the time when the customer suffers from a power cut. So much for the emergency call provision.

      1. shah27

        Re: Copper

        So many people have no idea that their phones work when their electricity goes out. Suspect many will claim they have a mobile so why does it matter.

        1. Roland6 Silver badge

          Re: Copper

          Yes the reports from the UK regions affected by storm Arwen about the availability of phone communications is quite interesting. Probably worth having a satellite phone that can be recharged via a bicycle or similar.

        2. Lazlo Woodbine

          Re: Copper

          Not so good when the storm also takes out the only available cell tower.

          Or as happened during Storm Desmond, the power outage is so prolonged (4 days in our case) the battery backup on the tower died and generators ran out of fuel.

          We were forced to drive 10 miles to Morecambe and use the feeble signal coming across the bay from Grange to phone family to tell them we were safe.

        3. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: Copper

          If they rely on DECT phones then the phone will fail. That's why it pays to have a POTS phone in the circuit. If they have, then all they have to do is pick up the handset & they'll hear the dial-tone. Using a mobile in an extended power cut - assuming the base stations are working - is likely to mean starting the car to recharge it.

          1. Lazlo Woodbine

            Re: Copper

            "Using a mobile in an extended power cut - assuming the base stations are working - is likely to mean starting the car to recharge it."

            Or having sufficient USB power packs to recharge the phone for a few days

        4. DomDF

          Re: Copper

          The phone masts round here have no battery backup and all go off when there's a power cut.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Bon Appetit

    Cheap UK infrastructure. Mmmmm Délicieux. Merci encore!

    1. R Soul Silver badge

      Re: Bon Appetit

      Not sure about that.

      BT's almost as yummy as a 50 year old turkey twizzler filled with rusty razor blades. Bon appetit!

  5. John Sager

    Deja Vu

    expanded rapidly via mergers and acquisitions

    A certain other Telco in the States grew that way in the 90s but it didn't last. I remember thinking 'bubble' at the time.

  6. Howard Sway Silver badge

    will not hesitate to act if required to protect our critical national telecoms infrastructure.....

    .......... from the huge political embarrassment for the Tories of being taken over by a Frenchman.

    I mean, it was never a problem when that critical national infrastructure was our water or railways, so I can only conclude that all the blather about "Global Britain being open for business" comes with rather non-free-market conditions attached such as "subject to non-generation of hostile xenophobic tabloid newspaper headlines", especially when the government is going through, shall we say, a bit of a rough patch.

    This is what happens when you wave the nationalist flag too vigorously, whilst simultaneously planting a "For Sale" sign on all the stuff that's still worth something.

  7. NeilPost Silver badge

    TV

    The solution for BT Sport simple…

    Flog or Joint Venture it with Fox Sports or ESPN (who they already have a relationship with).

    Neither has I would say a significant footprint on Europe..

    1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Re: TV

      Alternatively, realise it's not even telecoms and doesn't belong in the business. However this is a telecoms corporation that at one time decided it didn't need to be in the mobile phone business.

  8. simpfeld

    Not sure what BT's for really

    It's only the last mile stuff from Openreach that the UK cares about, surely. Nothing else of BT is really worth a damn anymore.

    Let him have the boat anchor that is the rest of BT but force them to sell off Openreach (which isn't great either but it's a bit of a monopoly).

  9. DomDF
    Facepalm

    If the government cares so much about protecting BT why did it sell it in the first place?

  10. wyatt

    It amazes me that BT make any money, aren't they meant to be paying into a massive deficit of a pension pot? How can anyone make money when they owe so much.

    I'd have also thought that BT would be considered CNI, allowing foreign control of this (and other) assets is madness.

  11. drankinatty

    Tell the Brits to Run Like Hell away from Drahi

    Patrick Drahi and Altice are the worlds worst when involved in internet and telco. He will strip all knowledgeable tech support and all customer service leaving a hollowed out shell of a company that provides pitiful service to customers (including business customers) while sweeping the profits from the company. We know him well in the states, where he took over the customer-centric internet provider Suddenlink and ran it into the ground. If you value BT, run, don't walk, run.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like