Truck or jail cell
The wetware steerng the thing will never be allowed out.
Chinese auto maker Geely, which owns Volvo, Lotus and other car brands, has unveiled a hybrid electric truck it says will go on sale in 2024 offering all the comforts of home. Launched yesterday by Geely's commercial vehicle brand, Farizon Auto, the "Homtruck" is named to reflect that it's a semi-truck to handle any hauling …
Hauliers could charge the drivers rent, since the cab's facilities mean that drivers wouldn't need to rent conventional, stationary accommodation.
Everyone's a winner: driver saves spending all their disposable on a crappy hovel that they seldom see, and haulier can set the rent and service charge at roughly the same rate as the driver's renumeration. The cooking facilities could be designed to handle only the produce which is solely-available in the haulier's shop, at reasonable rates.
They don't make it explicitly clear, but the inference from the clues in the text seems to indicate that this only applies to long stops, eg overnight or proper 2-day breaks and even more specifically to doing so in, eg a lay-by. It's certainly about time truckers were treated better and this sounds like a good start. Clearly the employers are doing nothing, so it's well past time for legislation to force them. Another good start would be more and upgraded truck-stops with decent shower blocks and bogs.
As for this new truck, I know some trucks are already a little like a mine-flat/studio apartment, but most of the ones I've seen seem to be poor attempts to jam scaled down "furniture" into available spaces. When you look at some of the incredible engineering that goes into caravans and camper vans, it makes you wonder why the truck builders aren't hiring those designers.
Thanks, that does make it more clear. I drive a car, and our company has a 2hr limit on driving, we have to take a 15 minute break. I usually find a services or roadside cafe, have a wander around, have a coffee. But finding somewhere to pull over and have a walk is much easier in a car, and the vast majority of the time, I'm sleeping in my own bed at night. On rare occasions, it might be a hotel.
that's my take on it - aside from the autonomous claims.
An actual truck driver might appreciate not having to get a hotel room or even go to a truck stop for cross-country hauling though. This is a thing in the USA where it might take a few days to get from one coast to the other, with Rocky Mountains in between.
(or it's a place to "wait it out" if you get stuck at the bottom of a mountain because the pass is frozen or filled with mudslides or something similar)
I would have included a diesel generator to at least partially re-charge while you sleep.
"I would have included a diesel generator to at least partially re-charge while you sleep."
For the sort of trips you mentioned, which are also a thing in other parts of the world too, ie could be days between charging points, yes, some form of charging while parked up is going to be a must. Or, as per the article, hybrid rather than full electric. I wonder how much charge an over-day sleep break and driving at night would help? I'm thinking solar panels across the trailer roof too, where possible. Maybe in places like Oz with long, straight outback roads. I've no idea if that's a bad idea from either the drivers point of view or night-time animal hazards in the dark.
not sure why methanol instead of diesel fuel though. Diesel tanks would be physically smaller, and the engine more efficient. It's the nature of the fuel. Alcohols are already "partially oxidized" causing them to have less heat content.
The focus seemed to be more on the electric side, though, swapping out the entire battery assembly and things like that. In my view, a diesel generator would be separate but connected up MOSTLY to charge batteries while you're stopped (or maybe run while you drive for hill climbing). Maybe it's the kind of thinking that comes from having been on a submarine...
An advantage to not running the diesel generator continuously is that when an engine is operating at max power it's also operating at (or close to) max efficiency. This is especially true for diesel engines due to the way they work. In general they should pollute less in this configuration, and you would not have to run the thing inside a city (let's say) and just run on batteries within urban areas when you can. Then of course when you need the extra power to climb hills you'd have both batteries AND diesel engine to do that.
But mostly, it would charge batteries when you're stopped. I guess [un]loading counts for that, too.
Bob, Oz truckers on long haul trips like East coast to Perth, a mere 2500 km or so have decent sleeper cabins for the reason you cite. When their daily hours are coming they can park on the truck pull-off areas along the main highways, joining grey nomads in mobile homes or big SUVs towing stonking caravans, bikers like myself and sane car drivers napping instead of dying. Sometimes there are fueling points with cafes and less often, accommodation. Some of the Nullabour accommodation leaves some preferring to sleep up road in scrub. As for electric trucks, Bwahh hahaha. Load and range. Pulling a B-double or in NT, a semi with 5 trailers road-train is big diesel engine or nothing.
Given what Vulva have done with Polestar, and what LTI have done with the taxi, the smart money surely is on Geely to deliver this truck rather than Tesla playing at delivering the truck?
Also, given the total shit show HGV drivers are forced to endure in the UK with the total lack of facilities, it could be a real winner here and will go some way to improve the working conditions of HGV drivers? Not because of the autonomous driving which would mean those drivers would then have to go and flip burgers at McDonalds, but having a nice bathroom on board instead of a Volvic water bottle?
Also, given the total shit show HGV drivers are forced to endure in the UK with the total lack of facilities, it could be a real winner here and will go some way to improve the working conditions of HGV drivers?
It's easy to improve the working conditions of HGV drivers, the British government just doesn't want to.
"It's easy to improve the working conditions of HGV drivers, the British government just doesn't want to."
It's not all their fault. The truck stop owners have to shoulder some of the blame. But then truckers don't want to pay too much either. I've no idea of the economics of running a truck stop. Land prices? Taxes? General running costs? Owners assuming they are owed a couple of international holidays per year so won't invest in facilities?
Have a look at this article, including the embedded twitter thread for a few reasons as to why the UK's service stations are so poor.
Thanks, that was an interesting read. On the other hand, it seems local planning is part of the problem too, so, as I said, it's not ALL the Govts. fault. It's a large and wide ranging problem with multiple causes, including, according to that article, the profit-centric nature of the UK, which matches my comment about lorry park owners want their multiple international holidays :-)
Also, as a campaigning website, there was no mention of successful or new lorry park planning applications. It'd be interesting to see if that is a smaller or larger number than the rejected ones.
As I'm not involved in the industry, the only new one I can comment on is the new Services on the M1 extension just outside Leeds. north of the M62 junction since I pass there frequently and occasionally stop there, Oh yes, and the relatively new one further up, on the A1(M) at Wetherby.
I believe there are or were plans for a services just north of Borobridge too, just off a Motorway junction, that some locals were opposed to for no obviously good reason since it's a few miles north of the town and literally just off the junction.
>"It's easy to improve the working conditions of HGV drivers, the British government just doesn't want to."
Not been listening to the news in recent weeks, the British government is not the problem here(*), it is the haulage industry and specifically some major operators. Basically, we have to accept it is going to cost more to move stuff around.
(*)Although it did cause the cross channel and cross Irish sea freight problems...
Not because of the autonomous driving which would mean those drivers would then have to go and flip burgers at McDonalds, but having a nice bathroom on board instead of a Volvic water bottle?
Judging by the size of the cab in the image, I'd be surprised if they could fit any sort of toilet facilities onboard, let alone a nice bathroom.
True. Cask temperature is best. But that seems to be considered warm beer by most of the rest of the world's standards.
And something nicely malty, nutty and brown. I miss the old Whitbread Forest Brown Ale... Timothy Taylor's Landlord is close-ish, but less nutty.
"Slight downside of course is the carbon atom that is disposed off as CO2."
"Capture it."
The outputs from a methanol powered fuel cell will be water and CO2. This truck would make its own sparkling water and that sells for a higher price than diesel. It's a winner!
CH3-OH
if you capture the CO2, the weight increases as your adding an additional O (16) while loosing the 4 H's (4) so adding 12 for each unit of CH3-OH consumed, CH3-OH starts at 32 and CO2 is 44.
extra weight = more fuel needed to move the truck, admittedly likely not that much to the overall mass of a lorry but it must be considered.
Yes, but seeing as methanol can be synthesised fairly easily (the ETH in Zürich has just developed a prototype) that really isn't so much of a problem. And certainly a far smaller one than the looming lack of generational capacity required for all those charging stations.
No synthesised from air using Cerium Oxide. The clever bit is reducing CO2 to CO but it will also split H2 from water, all done using sunlight. The difficult bit is doing this cheap enough to avoid the inevitable problems with the black market. But even these are likely to be small in comparison with the costs of extra-generating and grid capacity required for charging points on every street corner.
I'm wary of predictions but given all the hype over CCS and batteries, it would be nice to hope that at some point we'll come across a nice, cheap catalyst for the reduction process.
Yeah, but the energy used to create it will, eventually, be from green renewable, so it's easily transported and stored using existing infrastructure. Setting up charging stations everywhere could well be less efficient, especially in more rural areas.
The problem with batteries is not charging efficiency but energy density. Oh, you also use lots of energy producing them. If you can produce hydrocarbons from water and CO2 using a catalyst you have a high enegry-density fuel that is easy to store and transport.
The problems with generation and distribution of energy for electric vehicles are, unfortunately, far from illusory: in Germany they've started to limit the grants for home connections to so many per street. In fact, if we don't come up with solutions, the current approach will make us completely dependent upon the owners of the charging infrastructure.
Diesel fuel is liquid energy, highly concentrated and relatively inexpensive compared to other fuels. Diesel engines are also very efficient (large scale engines as high as 50%), which is why they are used EVERYWHERE when it comes to producing propulsion power on a large scale (and flexible electric power on a moment's notice, i.e. "peaking" plants). I cannot imagine the physical size of fuel cells and fuel tanks that can crack methanol JUST to get the hydrogen, compared to that of a diesel engine.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302175
This article looks very favorably on fuel cells, but it is based on mathematical models, and not actual equipment. What it DOES say is that fuel cell systems are 40-60% efficient on HYDROGEN, or perhaps methane (I may have missed that detail scanning the article). Other fuels require some kind of 'cracking' which could dramatically lower efficiency, and the heat content (volumetrically and by weight) of "lightweight" fuels isn't as good as the heavier ones (like diesel fuel). Hydrogen gas is typically produced in large quantities using COAL, and the tanks that hold it are LARGE by comparison. Methanol tanks would ALSO need to be larger than diesel. So unless we have a spacecraft with liquid H2 and O2 available, fuel cells [from a practical standpoint] make less sense than classic diesel engines.
And In My Bombastic Opinion, re-purposing existing (proven) tech (diesel electric has been used in trains for a LONG time, for example) is better than trusting some new, shiny unproven tech too soon.
Apparently there is one fuel cell powered ship in operation in Germany, using hydrogen. My guess is that it does not scale well (like to an entire fleet) at this time.
# Usage - bob-text "Some text you want Bob-ifying"
function bob-text {
param (
[Parameter()]
[string] $text
)
$text = $text.ToLower()
$array = @()
$i = 0
while ($i -lt $text.Length){
$letter = $text.Substring($i,1)
$array += $letter
$i++
}
$newArray = @()
foreach ($item in $array) {
$randomize = Get-Random -inputObject 0, 1
if ($randomize) {
$item = $item.ToUpper()
}
$newArray += $item
}
$newtext = $newArray -join ''
return $newtext
}
Chemically, the biggest challenge, or the highest energy bump, is reducing CO2 to CO. Once you've done that you can basically pick your hydrocarbon, though shorter chains burn cleaner, which is why methane is popular. The alchohols don't require much pressurising but can still be difficult to handle because they promote corrosion.
We will, at some point, use fuel cells for everything because the motors can be so much smaller. But in the meantime synthesised hydrocarbons are a relatively good idea.
Science fiction novel "Coils" (1982) by Roger Zelazny and Fred Saberhagen had this. And different scenes with homicidally inclined machinery, but someone was making that happen... And in the book, the trucks are self-driving and convoying around a "near future" United States: the hero stops one for a necessary getaway. It's explained that the drivers' union insisted on cabs with living accommodation and a bed even if they didn't have to get out of it... or get into it. There is nobody in the truck cabs except for our hitchhiker. (They're not on strike, just unnecessary. Point noted that this is doubtful.) He goes to bed with the truck in motion, and wakes up when the trucks encounter teenagers jumping out in front of them for the fun of making them brake, which is a thing in this setting.
I'm not sure if I really appreciate the work of Roger Zelazny, because I gather that pieces he was proudest of are ones that I don't like so much. I enjoyed "Coils" and his "Nine Princes in Amber" series about the curious cosmic city Amber, and I believe he wrote the Amber books strictly for money. That said, "all the Sounds of Fear" and "Repent, Harlequin" are by Harlan Ellison, aren't they?
"The Doors of His Face, The Lamps of His Mouth" obviously is a fishing story set on and in the mighty oceans on Venus. ...Okay.
I do have to wonder who is going to load and unload the vehicles in a safe and effective manner? I mean if it's purely from warehouse to distribution center (and back again) then no problem. Truck arrives, drops off trailer and loads a new trailer.
But, have a multi-stop run (say from various supermarkets, dropping off full food cages and picking up empty ones) who's going to make sure the truck's cargo is secure? Would you trust thousands of pounds off stock to your wage slave early morning shelf filler? (having done this as a summer job, the drivers never let us near the trailers).
It's a mess waiting to happen.