Re: Opportunity
Yes, but more important still is how they are managed.
I comment to you the report on the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster and in particular the dissident appendix by Richard Feynman.
The short version is that the "physical" engineers were given the job of showing that their parts worked.
It never even occurred to the computer engineers that their parts worked.
So one engineer who pointed out the flaw that caused the Shuttle to exploded was told to "stop thinking like an engineer and start thinking like a manager". That's a quote and the rest is horrible history. People who found problems were trouble makers.
The IBM guys took the opposite approach, someone who found a bug or bizarre improbable state was seen as doing what Gus Grissom would have called "good work"
The difference is stark.
The computers of the Challenger kept on working after the explosion, then falling from near orbit, then for a while after it hit the water . Some of what they reported is apparently still classified.
Earlier incidents include a massive over voltage melting one of the circuit boards with the result of small lumps of solder floating in microgravity causing a constant stream of random short circuits.
Yeah, that didn't bring the system down either.
ITpros who bring up problems aren't rewarded, often denigrated which is why in my survery 22% of them have been affect by a ransomware attack.