Time to apply the duck test
to Paypal, Apple pay & Google pay. If they act like a bank they should be subject to bank type rules.
Opening up to competition is also good.
I am often critical of the Chinese - but very much approve of this.
China has again cracked down on Alibaba, this time by ordering its fintech arm Ant Group to become a financial holding company that is subject to tighter regulations. Chinese regulators met with Ant Group on April 12 to lay out required business changes inspired by Beijing’s concern that technology firms acting as finance …
I agree with the general view that all elements of the financial sector must play by a common set of rules, but disagree that payment services should be treated like banks, because they aren't banks: they don't hold monetary amounts except for the short time they are in transit through the payment system, don't pay interest or service debt.
The better model to follow is that of existing funds transfer services, e.g S.W.I.F.T. and SEPA internationally, or CHAPS, FASTPAY and BACS in the UK, which are all designed to securely handle financial transfers between accounts at any pair of member banks.
Paypal and Alipay are definitely banks.
Income gets paid into them, they hold it and will let you withdraw it.
They will also decide to lock your account with no notice, cancel your account because an algorithm makes a mistake and confiscate all your money fro breaking some vague 'terms and conditions'.
They also have no insurance, no regulatory oversight and often no way of contacting them.
@YAAC "Paypal and Alipay are definitely banks." I agree and Apple pay & Google pay don't fall into definition.
But this quote from the article "Other Beijing-directed changes include a requirement to open its near-ubiquitous Alipay payment app to competitors" would be nice if Apple pay & Google pay were forced to do that.
I was going to say much the same thing. As I understand it, PayPal is already treated like a bank in Europe. Now China as well?
Not being willing to hand over my financial details to an unregulated bank (and especially one with a long standing reputation for high-handed conduct) I don't use PayPal. That's kind of a problem as most North American vendors seem to believe that nothing could possibly go wrong as long as PayPal is available and not too expensive.
I realize that China bashing is the motif dejure, but perhaps we Americans could lease a few Chinese regulators for a while. Maybe we could pretend they are Japanese or slightly odd looking Italian consultants.