The Obvious Comeback...
"Do you expect me to talk Blofeld?"
"No Mr. Bond, I expect you to dive..."
As the world's arms sales folk and protestors alike gather in London's Docklands for the Defence and Security Expo International, one small business has what appears to be the perfect accessory for your Bond-villainesque lair: namely, a mini submarine. Subsea Craft's Diver Delivery Unit is a modern take on the old X-Craft …
I'm going to go with that one coming from the bloopers reel. Along with the one where Sean Connery is left tied to the slab and all the crew have gone off for lunch leaving the laser on (for a joke, of course). "Union rules, isn't it, mate? No more than 2 hours without a tea break and only special effects technicians are allowed to operate the controls..."
I was thinking of the Beatles and trying (to hard) to link it in.
The RNLI was just a means of justifying why the sub should be in a colour other than black. I think the yellow wellies and oilskins would colour match a yellow submarine nicely...
However, I thought the early RNLI inflatables were yellow (70's/80's), before everything was standardised on the modern orange colour scheme, but then I could be totally wrong and just getting confused with the yellow wellies etc.
Cuddles,
We may not have seen the RNLI's fleet of low-observable submarines, but surely that's the whole point?
A few years ago, a secret report determined that modern shipping was becoming incredibly safe. And that there would soon be no need for lifeboats, as life-guards could deal with all the lost swimmers on beaches.
However this has since changed. Since the RNLI began deploying their fleet of armed and stealthy submarines, shipping losses have increased again - confirming the continuing requirement for lifeboats.
There is no connection between these two facts. There is nothing to see here. Please place your money in the lifeboat shaped collection boxes - after all that's a very nice ship you've got there - and we wouldn't want anything to happen to it now would we.
Search for narco submarines...the South American drug cartels have built some quite large cargo carrying subs, where this beastie is more like a speedboat with relatively limited space and limited subsurface capabilities (100ft depth/25nm range)...designed by someone who maybe watched a wee bit too much Stingray when he was young..
I'm not criticising it, and would love to have a play with one, but the marching powder merchants have designed and run some interesting submersible beasties capable of shifting tons of their stuff.
OK, I'm a little disappointed that this little cruiser has a whopping 1500 HP but can't deploy a hydrofoil to sprint at ludicrous speeds. Or drive water cutting jets to slice open other boats as you pass by. I'd even settle for a reto laser over the periscope. There's a real lack of sinister gadget accessories on this sub. Hopefully there's a big space for DIY projects.
OK, I'm a little disappointed that this little cruiser has a whopping 1500 HP but can't deploy a hydrofoil to sprint at ludicrous speeds. Or drive water cutting jets to slice open other boats as you pass by.
Ramming speed!
ISTR talk some years ago about undersea planes being the next big thing, ie using aerodynamic principles in hydrodynamic ways to 'fly' underwater. Not heard much about that lately, so guessing it either didn't work, or did & has gorn dark.
As for supervillains, well, Paul Allen's Octopus is for sale, which had a mini sub. But the ultimate supervillian yacht should surely be a 200m pleasure palace that can dive deeper and outfight a Seawolf or equivalent.
There's a basic problem that's common to "flying" both in air and in water: when you use forward motion, gravity takes over.
In the air, with a bit of luck you might be able to glide to the ground.
Underwater, it would probably be relatively easy to glide to the ground. However, that might not be the most desirable outcome.
The 4 hours is for when you are submerged using the electric motors which (I think, but can't be bothered to check) the article said can do 25NM.
The idea is that you approach at high speed, drop below the surface for the approach and then release the "operators" to do what ever they are there for and have the option to wait several hours underwater before they are deployed.
Carbon fiber hull?
A, uh, friend of mine is curious if it could be fitted with upper deck hatches and forward/rear hatches for egress of self-guided cylindrical devices capable of moving at high speed and delivering a useful payload to the destination. Would said modifications compromise the structural integrity of the vessel, or have such allowances already been made and simply need to be installed? Also, does it come with an option for leather seats?
But the most successful midget sub actions were the Italians' daring raid on the Alexandria anchorage in 1941 the put the HMS Valiant and Queen Elizabeth on the (admittedly shallow) bottom and out of action for a year. For days later, only one of the five IJN Kō-hyōteki-class midget subs managed to get into Pearl Harbor, but it put a torpedo in to the USS West Virginia, and a similar craft seriously damaged HMS Ramilles in Diego Suarez in 1942, putting the vessel out of combat operations for over a year.
Sometimes the raids weren't all that effective. A Japanese mini-sub managed to get into Sydney Harbour and managed to sink a ferry before it was sunk in its turn. Not a good ROI really.
IIRC the casualty rates for the X/XE-class were pretty horrific (well, mini-subs in general). Not taking away anything from the success of course, but I don't think I'd be a volunteer...