IT consultant gets 4 years' porridge for tax fraud An IT consultant has been jailed for four years after lying about his income to avoid paying £170,000 in tax. Hamauon Khan, 46, also known as Billy Khan and Billy Love, was sentenced after an HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) investigation proved he had failed to declare his earnings. Khan had claimed he was unemployed for at …
But 4 years? FFS come on! Some rapists get less than that!
And if you're called Google or Facebook or AnOther BigCorp Plc you can just pay whatever you feel like yet still to a grateful fawning HMRC and you're welcomed with open arms by the suckers in government. Double standards , much?
In the governments eyes, *NO crime deserves gaol time like tax aviodance.
Of course, this only applies to the little people. Globalmegahypercord LTD need have no such worries, as a paltry fine of less than what this clown avoided paying will suffice and serve to teach them the error of their ways.
No idea why you got a downvote for stating something which is a clear and well established fact.
Avoidance involves declaring your income and using legal methods (Such as pensions, ISAs etc) to reduce your tax liability, Evasion involves not declaring your income correctly in the first place (as this guy did)
It was 2 years for tax fraud and 2 years for child support offences, these will run concurrently with usual parole, and if he's been inside awaiting trial he's probably already out.
This dates from the 2013 arrest with a guilty plea entered in Sept 2015. If he was on bail then he'll be out for the next tax year.
Yet the punishment for fiddling your porn and stealing £100k+ if you're an MP is just to pretend to apologise, being allowed to keep the loot of course.
Colin Spinks, assistant director of the Fraud Investigation Service, HMRC, said: “Khan has to pay the price for his deliberate attempts to steal money from UK taxpayers – money that could have been used to fund vital public services." But went on to add that "...most likely wasn't used that way however as we just bandy this term about to hide our own inability to correctly manage money. More likely is that the money was actually spunked on a failed IT project, some no-name MPs expenses, or used to crowd fund a missile that we ultimately fired at unarmed brown people somewhere in the Middle East".
It was probably one of those mud slinging approaches the CPS likes to use today. He should have paid this much tax and if he had he would have had to pay this much child support so we'll go after him for that too.
As others have said if your a big company you get away with it or at least negotiate but the average man....... I think making him pay it back plus a fine would have been enough it would probably have reduced the cost of the trial and he could be out earning money and paying some tax instead of sitting in prison where we're paying to feed and clothe him.
No doubt he deserved penal servitude of some kind, there has to be some fairness in the application of sentences. Financial crime, hit him financially, big time, take all that he has, if necessary. When physically dangerous people walk away from horrible acts with little retribution or consequences that don't reflect the seriousness of the crime then something is wrong.
Sentencing Khan, Judge Laing QC said: "... and you have used the money for your own benefit for a lavish lifestyle and foreign holidays.”
So you get a shorter sentence if you spend your ill-gotten-gains on domestic holidays rather than foreign ones? Do Scotland and Wales count as foreign or domestic?
Billy Khan is a freelancer as it s mentioned here clearly, now my question is if his all belongs are taken away from him as a penalty for his fraud( though very hard word to be used here) as sentenced him jail, will it not be sufficient for any person? why such posts are created in number of online sites with culprit name and hence take away all the rights to re live a better life? to me such people are as unlawful as the culprit himself. but why there is no penalty for such people who provoke such things?
there i can see 36 posts but none of them was replied by the reporter herself.
in religion even when anyone pays for his sins he is purged but here it is reversed. such actions takes the rights to relive.
now if you google Billy khan, billy khan crawley or hamauon khan you would see all these links right there on front, in such circumstances how anyone can live a better life after he is all clear from penalties?
i would appreciate if anyone can answer.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
