Patent Troll Unit set up by Virginia government to slay lawsuits Suing a company for patent infringement just got a lot tougher in the state of Virginia. The state (technically a commonwealth) has created a new legal office focused entirely on patent litigation. Specifically, the state's Patent Troll Unit will look to extract penalties and legal fees from companies who make unjust patent …
So ATM this gives a competitive advantage to businesses operating in Virginia and so encourages them to move there. Could this start other states doing the same thing so as not to disadvantage themselves? A race to the top makes a nice change from the usual race to the bottom as everyone tries to shave pennies from costs.
"They're actually calling it the "Patent Troll Unit" - I wonder if there'll be defamation lawsuits over the name?"
Another good point. Seems that if they were serious they would not so name the unit. Merely being investigated by a govt. arm named "Patent Troll Unit" would harm an honest but wrongly accused company. No thinking politicians would make so elementary an error, or at least their staffs would clue them in.
The result is a name that sounds tough to the casual news consumer, but can't be used as advertised without lots of blow-back. Was that the intended result?
Honest, wrongly accused?? Seriously, Virginia did not come out against patents or against patent suits over genuine controversies. Its unit specifically targets companies whose purpose in existence is simply "legal" extortion. They have no "product" that is in any way damaged by their prey's products or activity and they bought the patent simply to collect the royalty. They are simply incorporated hold-up artists that use paper instead of more material weapons.
> "Define "misused", and give examples of the sort of thing you mean."
No problem. What happens if a pol quietly intimates to a CEO of a troll company that his company can avoid unpleasant scrutiny from the Patent Troll Unit with a donation to a certain campaign fund? I can think of more scenarios, but you get the point.
And if that company isn't really guilty it works just as well!
and most certainly never by an AG who has already proven himself to be the ultimate progtard with regards to constitutional protections be they Federal or Commonwealth.
Yep, Herring got himself into so much trouble with voters he desperately, desperately needs any positive press he can get. And El Reg is more than happy to oblige.
@ a_yank_lurker
Interesting point. I'm not familiar with the arcane workings of what appears to be a dual system of jurisprudence.
On the one hand it might simply be enough to frighten off the troll to try someone easier, rather like the troll who backed off when they realised their target was a subsidiary of Newegg.
However there may be something to get a wedge into. For instance if someone were to announce publicly that so-and-so is infringing my patent there could be a possibility of bringing a civil case for libel which, I assume, isn't a federal case. I'm not suggesting that this is how they plan to work it but the linked article indicates something vaguely similar, namely acting on the troll's letter so it could be an offence analogous to demanding money with menaces.
If it is really "feral" then plainly we need an animal control unit to deal with it.
Besides, the unit's purpose is to "file injunctions." That means that the Commonwealth of Virginia has come out explicitly in favor of digging potholes in the previously smooth road the trolls had from filing suit to payout. The state has designated a unit specifically to impede trolls. It can't act directly against them because patents fall under Federal (not "feral") law, but it can certainly make the bridge they dwell under less homey and their suits more expensive. Given the "prefer low hanging fruit, prey on the weakest" character of patent trolls, incorporation in Virginia becomes a desirable state.
If VA's move is successful, I would expect other states to do the same. Even if VA can only use various state laws, any legal action will drain money from the trolls. The troll model is based on the inability of the victim to mount a proper legal defense. Even if you are aware of the model to mount a defense is likely to cost one some cash and one might be tempted to settle with the troll.
Another point this move brings up is the possibility of criminal charges against the trolls in VA with the state intervening in the various civil suits on behalf of the defendants. This could be a more interesting threat: meritless shake down suits in VA result in criminal charges in VA with extradition to stand trial.
Again I hope VA succeeds because the trolls deserve far worse.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
