Call of Duty terror jabber just mindless banter Eye-watering claims that video games are secure communications hubs for terrorists have been shot down in a demonstration by security wonks who tested claims nation-states could not intercept chatter and that messages can be written in bullet holes. Playstation 4 was last year fingered as a favourite communciations channel for …
... in game chatter is being monitored by spooks (reported by Snowden 2013). Such weak crypto makes this easier to do on a mass automated scale.
Expect future backdoors in games being mandated by governments under the banner of 'protection from terrorists/won't somebody think of the children'
"You cannot communicate large chunks of information effectively,"
Whoever said that terrorists would have long, detailed discussions by this means? They'd be pretty dumb to do that, even if it was feasible.
As a means of passing simple info (eg confirming time/date/place/) based on pre-arranged signals, it could work quite well. As could any publicly-accessible place - eg el Reg forums.
Sure there's been hype on this subject, but I hope the intelligence bods are at least considering these potential means of communicating simple messages.
For that you might as well use SMS. In clear text.
As used by... ooops... the Paris lot.
So much for all the conspiracy theories - they are "Designs on Jerry".
> For that you might as well use SMS. In clear text.
Or even: Bumbling would-be UK bomber asked Twitter followers for target suggestions
Whoever said that terrorists would have long, detailed discussions by this means?
Continuing with that theme, wasn't there a court case last year against alleged terrorists (Don't know if they got charged) where they were looking at a terse message and saying "This bit could mean" a lot...?
More like a cesspit of racial hate...
After playing COD I honestly think they should remove chat services from games and leave it to third party chat services, so people only chat with there friends.
Anyone who has played COD only will know how bad it can be...
South Korea must have 100s of MMOs just by itself. There are probably millions of live server instances if you count every host of multiplayer game in existence. Everything from first person shooters to online chess to text MUD games. And that's not even counting games that do peer to peer hosting.
Trying to monitor them all is an utterly futile task. I suppose there might be benefit for law / spy agencies to persuade Sony, Microsoft, EA, Activision etc to put some hooks into games and their voice / message services so they can monitor chat or log ids, IP addresses and other metrics but I doubt it would be much use unless they had specific intelligence and knew what they were looking for.
Aye, and many games could probably generate endless false positives:
"Lets nuke the city!" (C&C Generals)
"Right, lets go be terrorists!" (Counterstrike)
etc etc
Heaven forbid anyone discuss the end of the original C&C Nod campaign "Blow the white house/Eiffel Tower/Houses of Parliament/Brandenburg Gate". They'd run out of fuel constantly scrambling the black helicopters.
And that's before they start reading the dross and bile that some individuals spew onto the chat and speech channels.
> There are probably millions of live server instances if you count every host of multiplayer game in existence.
Is that counting special issues recoded enigma style for specialist communcations?
Or can we still rely on suitable arms techniques being used as morse?
Actually I can see one thing of benefit to the terrorists... the base content of the chat messages in (for example) COD would be of people saying they want to blow stuff up and shoot/kill people vs (say) facebook where the base content is people talking about their children and pets. This gives 2 advantages that it would be difficult to monitor the whole COD network to pick up 'out of context' messages. And it would also be reasonable defence in court that you were indeed just playing COD.
They claim that the PSN chat differs from Whatsapp in that whatsapp provides end to end message encryption whereas the PSN does not. This appears to be based solely on the fact that when they sniffed the PSN traffic they saw it was encrypted and transported using TLS.
They did not claim to bave decrypted this TLS traffic or have any real knowledge of what it was.
Last time I looked at Whatsapp, I'm pretty sure I saw that it too was using TLS for all traffic.
TLS, is just encryption of the transport layer between the client and server. It has no bearing on whether the traffic it carries is further encrypted in an end-to-end manner.
BTW, I have no knowledge on how PSN messaging actually operates but claiming that it does or does not implement certain features based purely on the use of TLS is just as faulty reasoning as that which they are trying to debunk.
I've seen a couple of episodes - because I didn't believe it was as bad as I'd heard.
But then, I'd also watched a couple of episodes of Scorpion. So - I suppose I should have known it could be far worse than I'd heard...
True but to give some credit to the shows creators it might just perhaps get some of the users of the millions of US owned Windows PC that have no AV installed to think "Perhaps I should get something installed."
And maybe the US botnet population goes down a bit.
No promises. Just maybe, a bit.
Ban the pen, cos words can be written
Ban air, cos the vibrations can form into words
Ban stenography, cos there might hidden messages
Ban light, cos it can be used for morse code
Ban the tongue, cos it can shape sound
Ban the....
Should we all just jump off of a cliff, cos you know, we're all potential terrorists.
Hey Barry, I've lost my bloody code book, can I grab another copy tonight? Just to check your postcode is AA1 2BB isn't it? I'll poke it into the satnav and wander over tonight.
Oh and any chance your mum can do me an egg buttie. I told you using food as code would make us fat.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
