back to article Apple! and! Yahoo! fight! the! man!, claims! EFFing! daftness!

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has pushed out its fifth annual "Who Has Your Back" report, claiming to chart tech companies' commitment to "the next frontier of user privacy". The EFF's categorisation of what constitutes effective privacy standards for data controllers has seen it award full marks to Apple, Yahoo! …

  1. noboard

    Errrmmm

    If this report covers 2012 to 2013 data then why does it have a sections on:

    Discloses government content removal requests

    Pro-user public policy opposes backdoors

    It's only recently they've been telling us about government requests and this prompted the whole "encrypt everything on the device" from Apple and google. So everyone should be marked down as they didn't have our backs during the reports timeframe.

    Can we have a "Who's got your back report" when it comes to issuing reports, I think this lot will be marked down in the "Doesn't publish nice things for companies that pay them money" category.

    1. NumptyScrub

      Re: Errrmmm

      That time period is for the financial backing data (which companies paid the EFF money so they could continue to operate) rather than the actual "Who's Got Your Back" report.

      From the article:

      Cardozo told The Register that the group does disclose its financials — although because of the way a non-profit body works, the most recent report covers July 2012 to July 2013, a period before most of the global surveillance revelations came to light. ®

    2. SuccessCase

      Re: Errrmmm

      I'm not surprised you're confused. The Register are engaging in their usual shoddy reporting and showing yet again that they will do everything they can to dis' Apple. The EFF, a well respected organisation doing important work defending Internet freedoms, have commended Apple. Right well then there's only one thing we can do; lets dis' the EFF. Surely if they are commending Apple, they must be a bunch of money grabbing capitalists spreading corrupt propaganda? So with top reporting integrity, let's, without a shred of evidence, leave hanging the suggestion their report has been bought. Let's put the qualification the EFF provided in response to this unjustified slur at the end of the article so it isn't too close to contradicting the disgracefully misleading sub-head we have left there because if someone pats Apple on the back we love to throw mud at them. Let's have bad enough grace to maintain the suggestion of unethical practice by the EFF, even though they have a history of defending important rights and The Register have NO reason to doubt their work except, oh, Apple under Tim Cooks leadership, are proving to be rather more ethical than our preferred Mega-Corp, Google. Shit our Peak-Apple meme failed. Shit, Apple are open sourcing SWIFT and allowing apps to be installed on devices by any Xcode user (available free) regardless of wether they are members of the development program. Shit Apple have committed to protecting user privacy have published a white paper giving comprehensive detail of how they are protecting it (pretty much ignored by The Register) and are doing a far better job of it than Google.

      Seriously Register, you need to start re-evaluating. Increasingly it seems you have picked the wrong mega-corp to assume "super-evil" can always, and without thought, be prepended. Tim Cook basically told the US government they are wrong re-access to private data and to take a hike. Perhaps it's time to simply recognise that, for a CEO of his level, he is a quite surprisingly progressive and has a slight activist bent; and yes that tendency probably is informed by his experiences as a gay man. You're acting like a bunch of kids who the more you are found to be wrong, the more entrenched you become.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Errrmmm

        Register hacks bash Google all the time. EFF bashing is an extension of Google bashing, since ohmygerd EFF took the monies. Simply ignore all the work, all the court cases, all the info they publish, the tools they have built, and this report (which explains each rating for you).

  2. Mage Silver badge
    Unhappy

    So practically pointless

    not on whether they shared data with commercial partners, or whether they snooped on users' devices and trafficked that data back to their own labs:

    "there's likely room for an entirely different report that looks at how much data companies collect, retain, and share."

    "There are lots of things we could rank companies on: for instance, how well they encrypt user data,"

    A lot of EFF activities of late seem dubious.

    1. SuccessCase

      Re: So practically pointless

      "A lot of EFF activities of late seem dubious."

      Like what?

  3. ukgnome

    Awesome! to! see! that! the! exclamation! is! still! in! use!

  4. Shaun Hunter

    Alex Martin didn't read the full EFF report before writing this article.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like