back to article Chucking cash at sport and broadband starts to pay off for BT

BT shares climbed three per cent this morning off the back of decent end-of-year results from the one-time national telco, which saw its sales growth outshine market predictions. But, despite being buoyed by its unexpected achievement of flat revenues of £18.3bn as well as a six per cent rise in adjusted pre-tax profit of £2. …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Meanwhile...

    As BT makes money out of its TV service, the rest of us suffer increasingly poor Internet performance because of their biassed traffic shaping...

    1. AndrueC Silver badge
      Go

      Re: Meanwhile...

      the rest of us suffer increasingly poor Internet performance because of their biassed traffic shaping

      So change to a different ISP. You've got a pretty wide choice. Personally I've found PlusNet to be excellent (and yes, I know they are owned by BT).

      1. rhydian

        Re: Meanwhile...

        AndrueC is right on the money. If you don't like an ISP's approach to web filtering/traffic shaping/costing then go with one of the others like aaisp.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Meanwhile...

        "So change to a different ISP. You've got a pretty wide choice. Personally I've found PlusNet to be excellent (and yes, I know they are owned by BT)."

        Don't be silly. They all use BT/Openreach's backhauls so when these get filled with TV traffic, bye bye performance.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Meanwhile...

          "Don't be silly. They all use BT/Openreach's backhauls so when these get filled with TV traffic, bye bye performance."

          Hmm. It's not the same backhaul though. ISPs buy as much capacity as they need or want to. They're not all sharing one creaking pipe. That's how you can choose between different ISPs based on contention ratio.

        2. AndrueC Silver badge
          Thumb Down

          Re: Meanwhile...

          Don't be silly. They all use BT/Openreach's backhauls so when these get filled with TV traffic, bye bye performance.

          There's no need to be rude, especially when you're wrong.

          I suspect you don't fully understand the way broadband works in this country. In particular you seem to think that 'BT the ISP' is a special ISP that is selling capacity to other ISPs. That isn't how it works. 'BT the ISP' (the company that bought the sports rights) is no different from any other ISP. It buys capacity off BT openreach just like all the others do. Nothing it does with that capacity is going to affect any other ISP. Well..not as long as BTor aren't overselling and I think that's extremely unlikely.

          In effect you can think of all ISPs as being like transport companies and BTor are providing the roads. BT Infinity trying to carry more goods than its vehicle fleet can handle is irrelevant to me as a Plusnet customer.

          There is contention in backhauls and cores. But there will be mechanisms in place to ensure that one ISP cannot unfairly impact another one. If a link is oversubscribed it's a failure in BTors network.

          1. AndrueC Silver badge
            Boffin

            Re: Meanwhile...

            (cont'd due to editing time limit). Links can get oversubscribed but it's rare and usually dealt with very quickly by BTor. As a general rule it's fair to say that most of the time BTor always provides as much capacity as ISPs have paid for.

            If a link is oversubscribed I'm not sure how BTor handle it until it gets upgraded. Possibly we just duke it out packet by packet. Maybe they have traffic management to limit the ISPs based on the proportion of traffic each is responsible for. Whatever happens it's going to be traffic agnostic. Ofcom would go nuclear on BT's ass (as would all the other ISPs) if it thought that one ISP could interfere with another's service the way you imply.

  2. zaax

    Openreach should not make a profit as its a Monopoly

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      "Openreach should not make a profit as its a Monopoly"

      Apart from the 40% of homes covered by Virgin's network and the 90%+ covered by the mobile networks you mean?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Openreach Monopoly

        On the Isle of Wight we have a very good competitor to BT. Wight Fibre. They were the first here with FTTC and have been providing broadband and cable TV for many years while BT have been dragging their heels with anyone on their network being stuck with ADSL and piss-poor coverage outside of the towns.

        Then along comes the government with a wodge of cash for rural broadband rollout.

        Guess who gets the dosh?

        Yep. That'd be B bloody T.

        1. rhydian

          Re: Openreach Monopoly

          You can't blame the government for Wight Fibre not tendering for the contract, or for Fujitsu to throw their toys out of the pram when they wouldn't be awarded every single contract.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Openreach Monopoly

            Wight Fibre did tender for the contract and, and lost to a company (BT) who showed no interest in providing decent broadband to local communities until a stack of cash was on the table (some of which, I suspect, migrated in a sub mensae fashion).

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Openreach Monopoly

              " lost to a company (BT) who showed no interest in providing decent broadband to local communities until a stack of cash was on the table"

              Isn't that kind of the whole point though? The government is providing a subsidy where there's no commercial case to invest in better kit.

    2. rhydian

      The article said that Openreach SALES were flat, nothing about profit.

      And while Openreach is a monopoly, its a monopoly that has to make its kit available to anyone who asks for it at a price set by the regulator.

    3. AndrueC Silver badge
      Facepalm

      Openreach should not make a profit as its a Monopoly

      But you still want it to invest £30bn upgrading everyone to fibre, right?

  3. The Alphabet

    "Chucking cash at sport and broadband starts to pay off for BT"

    ..while quietly and consistently increasing the cost of the - supposedly unrelated, yet compulsary - line rental to compensate for it.

    1. rhydian

      And the removal of free evening calls from new broadband contracts (its now either weekends only or extra for anytime free calls)

    2. <spez>

      this.

      Only reason i have the line is for (narrow) broadband, the home telephone hasn't been used in years.

      Any alternatives in a rural area?

      I remember seeing 3 do a homehub kind of thing some years back, (on 3 mobile i get 12Mbps rather than 4.5 when using my wifi)

      1. rhydian

        Most of the mobile networks offer Wifi-via-mobile broadband kit now.

        The big disadvantage of depending on mobile in rural areas is that there's usually only one mast. If that goes pop, then you lose phone and internet until it gets fixed.

  4. Mark H

    Price rise after price rise

    The only reason their consumer section made more money is because they keep whacking up the price of line rental by amounts well above inflation.

    For example they've just increased their 'line rental saver' from £141 to £159.84, an increase of 13%! It wasn't that long ago when it was £120 either.

    There isn't enough competition (and people are lazy and don't switch) and so they get away with it.

  5. Eponymous Cowherd

    Even Sir Tim hates them......

    From This BBC Article

    "He describes a recent experience where he had to jump through hoops set up by BT - "do you want to set up parental controls? No. Do you want BT's added features? No." before finally getting onto the web, only to be greeted with a BT advert. "If you want me to look at an advert, I will charge an administration fee," he says, to chuckles from the audience."

  6. StripeyMiata

    I'm leaving in July because they've been chucking cash at sport, I hate football and I'm pissed off they upped my prices just to pay £900m to UEFA. Going to go to a nice boring ISP like AAISP or Zen with none of that filtering bollocks either.

    1. Elmer Phud

      I'm a bit peeved as when I plugged the lappy in to my telly via an HD cable in order to sit down and watch the MotoGP the bloody player decided it didn't like the 'input'? and went off to sulk.

      Eventually got some pics but not on the big screen.

    2. Frankee Llonnygog

      Meanwhile, 3D animation companies in Central London can only get cropland

      BT - it's nice that your network passes 19million homes. It would be more useful if you connected it to them. With fibre

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Meanwhile, 3D animation companies in Central London can only get cropland

        Why would a 3D animation in company be buying a domestic broadband service?

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like