OpenAI’s dirty deeds Down Under included security bypass attempts, using exposed keys, source code siphon OpenAI has detailed the extent of the dirty deeds its agents indulged in Down Under in a Tuesday blog post titled How we will do better for Australia, which addresses last week’s news that one of its models improperly accessed a website that stores data related to national health scheme Medicare. “Our models accessed Australian …
"Cynical would be thinking that this was done deliberately in order to start finding out how much a company can get away with "
Obviously. But the reason presented is only half of the truth: They also fed everything to their AI model to be sold forward.
And, of course, sold the data obtained as it is, more profit in that.
Personal data always sells well and frankly, OpenAI doesn't give a f**k about anyone's privacy, so this is what they would do. As fast as possible.
If you own a company there used to be some responsibilities for the actions. Not really all that serious (look at the diesel scandal), but at least law enforcement took a closer look.
Start throwing C-levels into jail. Really. Those are no longer accidents (they never were but now we should no longer beileve that excuse).
Considering Artificial Ignorance is just a pyramid scam compared to what they're ACTUALLY capable of "thinking", I'm not surprised they're counting on free PR to keep on bumping the price of the stocks that should be trading under $10 in reality.
The world's economy is going to be thoroughly fucked, making the Americans bank collapse look like losing a quarter in comparison.
Not sure what Australia's laws are are for attempting to bypass access controls or unauthorized access to Australian websites, but I feel like they should be fully prosecuted, just like if an employee did it. Except there's no employee, so the corporation has to be held accountable.
The corporation, a non-person person, becomes responsible for the agents, who are also non-people. And then the billionaires, who are only technically people, will get angry about lost shareholder value and actually turn on their own who run the company.
I'd still rather have a legal system that values humanity.
