The Register Home Page

back to article Russian spies take their half-click email attack from Zimbra to Outlook

The Russian espionage crew that turned simply reading an email into a security risk has expanded beyond Zimbra, with Proofpoint saying it's now pulling the same half-click trick against Microsoft Outlook Web Access. Proofpoint says the cyber group it tracks as TA488, or "Laundry Bear," began exploiting CVE-2026-42897, a cross- …

  1. Paul Herber Silver badge

    "one of the oldest pieces of security advice in the book"

    Rule 1: Don't use intrinsically unsafe operating systems and software.

    Rule 2: There is no rule 2.

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      An intrinsically unsafe operating system is any which has access to the computer

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Paranoia mode on, also any connected to the internet and not air-gapped

        1. Paul Herber Silver badge

          Air-gapped, yes, no Ethernet cable, only wifi and Bluetooth.

  2. steelpillow Silver badge
    Facepalm

    Words cannot

    Whoever decided that running scripts was a Good Thing for email clients?

    And after all this time, WHOEVER STILL FUCKING THINKS IT IS A GOOD IDEA???!!!

    1. RockBurner

      Re: Words cannot

      Marketing departments.

    2. oldandgrey
      Facepalm

      Re: Words cannot

      And another folly from the MS Outlook heritage of hazards: the automatic preview of attachments.

    3. doublelayer Silver badge

      Re: Words cannot

      They aren't running scripts intentionally. If you just include JavaScript in a message, clients, including webmail, won't run it. You need to find vulnerabilities like this which allow you to bypass the intentionally not-running they do. Those vulnerabilities tend to be easier to find in webmail which is usually built in the same JS you're trying to inject rather than standalone clients which can and often do use HTML rendering without any JS support.

      1. oldandgrey
        Thumb Up

        Re: Words cannot

        That's right! When an Ajax-driven webmail client displays a HTML email message, it has to separate its own HTML, CSS and JavaScript from the HTML, CSS and JavaScript that is included in the message. A bit of a tightrope, really. Plain text email messages are immune, of course. And the old SquirrelMail avoids a lot of problems by being written in pure PHP without any JavaScript.

        1. steelpillow Silver badge
          Facepalm

          Re: Words cannot

          Which is why I disable javascript when viewing HTML pages. If the fucking idiot is giving the email client the ability to run any kind of javascript anywhere, they are still a fucking idiot. Ditto the server for serving javascript ridden gobshite in the first place. FFS, it's not rocket science.

  3. Pascal Monett Silver badge
    Facepalm

    "a browser implant that can survive password changes and device rebuilds"

    Thank goodness we had all that faffle about Trusted Computing and requiring that the hardware include security checks and so on and, wait, what ?

    All that hassle to try and keep from running Linux (because that's what it was for) and you're telling me that a stupid browser implant can survive device rebuilds ?!?

    Just a question : can that browser implant also survive replacing the disk and reinstall from scratch ?

    Because if it can, those guys need to switch hats and go work at Redmond.

    Maybe then we'll finally get actual security in the Windows world.

    1. Sam Jelfs

      Re: "a browser implant that can survive password changes and device rebuilds"

      It survives in the server-hosted email inbox, so as soon as the user opens their email again, there it is.

      "survives <snip> even a complete device rebuild because the foothold resides in the compromised mailbox rather than on Windows itself"

  4. ecofeco Silver badge
    Gimp

    M$ slop keeps sloppin

    And no lessons were learned!

  5. firstnamebunchofnumbers

    Sidebar but... Zimbra was cool!

    Pouring one out for Zimbra. It was a gamechanger for the small biz I was network/server/CTO/developer at.

    Publishing business, mid-2000s, 20 Macs (OSX 10.3 Panther burned in the brain) and 30 Windows machines. Interop between MS and Macs was genuinely awful in those days but e-mail/groupware was escpecially problematic for Macs as the M$ version was deliberately knobbled and didn't support many aspects of on-prem Exchange at the time (MAPI and extensions IIRC). Our original in-house Exchange server from ~1999 was on its knees

    Trying to find self-hosted groupware to handle 50GB mailboxes that was cross-platform and handling 50GB mailboxes was a real challenge. This was before cloud and externally-hosted Exchange so Zimbra turned out to be an excellent solution at that time for people with massive mailboxes full of hi-res images being flung around.

  6. vand1

    If it resides in the inbox, does deleting the email get rid of it? Or is it doing something to the inbox itself?

    1. doublelayer Silver badge

      Once it executes, it has two persistence methods where it injects JavaScript into other areas. One of those is client side, so clearing cache for the site will eliminate that. The others are in cached messages which it has modified, so unless you clean or delete those as well, it can come back from that. There are also some settings which it changes to open the account to compromise even after it's been cleaned if they have another account on the same mail system. Therefore, cleaning this infection out requires knowing the multiple locations it modifies and either deleting or carefully removing the infection from them. See the Proofpoint summary for the details.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon