So it's not just me, then
>[HTML is] simpler for both people and machines
>the leaner, less-verbose JSON
Back in the day I had JSON thrown at me because it was "so much more efficient and easier to understand" than crufty old SQL or HTML. Er, no?
Now the foot in the other boot is, or something.
However if Anthropic want XHTML, they'll have to whistle. It's too intolerant of code typos. At least HTML gets displayed so you can instantly see your cock-up, without having to ferret around with parser output and line numbering. And it's backwards-compatible with all my old stuff when I give an old page a makeover, too.
>without the need to create a virtual DOM
My, it took a long time for the penny to drop. You only need one because the code-salad spaghetti (or is that code-spaghetti salad? Flame wars have erupted for less) is no longer human-readable.
>Liquid now allows for logical capabilities such as Boolean expressions, infix operators with precedence, and literal arrays and objects.
And it's more human-readable than wikitext's templating language. Happy bunny.