What it will take for an OFF Switch to be an option? For Copilot to kill people?
Microsoft fixes VS Code after app gives Copilot credit for human's work
Imagine working your butt off on a project, only to have VS Code put an attribution into your commit that says Copilot helped you, even if it did not. Microsoft has reversed a change that added a default AI attribution notice after user complaints that the bot was claiming credit for human-authored code. The initial change – a …
COMMENTS
-
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 07:40 GMT may_i
Re: Not so many legal implications but still...
The "Sent from my smartphone xxx" comments are actually added to the user's message by an app called Tapatalk.
This horrible app requires that the forum owner installs a plugin to enable it. Once installed, the plugin interfaces with the Tapatalk app. The big problem is what else it does. Regardless of the forum's robots.txt, the Tapatalk plugin downloads every message from the forum so that Tapatalk can use the data for searching and anything else they want to use it for.
Best avoided.
-
-
Monday 4th May 2026 23:11 GMT Taliesinawen
All hail our new AI overlords :o
Current AIs are not truly intelligent. They encode training data as tokens embedded in a high-dimensional vector space. The positions of these embeddings, together with learned weights in the attention mechanisms, capture statistical associations and contextual dependencies between tokens.
Combined with user input, these patterns generate new tokens that are decoded into text. Consequently, their accuracy is fundamentally limited by the quality and content of their training data, which consists largely of material scraped from the World Wide Web.
What’s more sinister is the tendency of AI developers to embed their own biases and prejudices into the models through training data selection and reinforcement learning. With every word you type, major AI companies are watching in real time. This is engineered ideological control wrapped in the friendly mask of technology.
-
Monday 4th May 2026 23:13 GMT Clausewitz4.1
Code completion
” The settings change was intended to "[add] the trailer for all AI-generated code, including inline completions."
Code completion has been around for years. Now its AI-coauthored? I expect soon an study saying “90% of human-produced code is now made with AI help”, based on commits.
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 15:44 GMT Edward Jazzhands
Re: Code completion
This is by far the most important comment here. Anyone who programs for a living knows it's absurd to now be lumping in AI code auto completion with "AI generated code". Using In-line suggestions is not the same thing as code being "AI generated". Suggestions only guess the very next thing you're about to type in, and in the vast majority of situations it only guesses whatever you were about to type yourself. This has been a standard feature in IDEs for years now, long before agents ever became a thing that made this a hot issue. If this is considered AI generated code then by the same standard, copy pasting code from StackOverflow does not count as programming.
-
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 00:01 GMT sarusa
More lies
The flood of enshittification just won't stop, can't stop.
> "There was no ill intent by [an] evil corporation, but rather a desire to support functionality
Uh huh. Surely not Microslop wanting to make it look like Copilot is used a lot more than it actually is.
The most damning thing is if it saw there was something it thought was AI, like if MS had silently jammed copilot into your setup (as they do) or if you had spell checking on (because of course spell checking is AI, right?) it would assume that if you had it there you must be using it so Copilot should get the work for all your code! And then of course, opting you in by default is always ill intent.
On the other hand, if you're still using Microslop's shit maybe you deserve what you get... but I realize a lot of that is out of actual coders' hands and is the decision of dumbass C-levels who've been bought off by MS.
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 04:07 GMT Jou (Mxyzptlk)
Isn't that blatant theft and copyright infringement?
Putting someone others name below something done, here code, somewhere else paintings, simply copyright infringement, and theft?
Here in a really really large scale? Since those companies are still US based this calls for the next class action lawsuit.
-
-
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 20:41 GMT sarusa
Re: OPT-IN
> Or opt-in to having your use of Copilot announced to the world, making keeping schtum about your little habit the default?
The biggest(?) problem here is that it was telling everyone you were a shitty vibe coder using Copilot *even if you weren't* - even if you hated everything it stands for. You are now, for eternity, 'on record' as being one of those chucklef@#$s even though you were completely innocent.
-
Thursday 7th May 2026 08:39 GMT Throg
Re: OPT-IN
Agreed.
My Echo Show recently “upgraded” me to Alexa+ Early Access. It don’t ask, it just did it.
The thing has been irritating me for a long while, but until now I’ve put up with Amazon’s nonsense as it was a handy kitchen timer and smart speaker.
This has pushed me into doing the right thing: jailbreaking it and installing LineageOS.
-
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 09:16 GMT ComputerSays_noAbsolutelyNo
This is how it starts & ends
First, CoPilot automatically add attribution to itself to all commits.
Then some brain-dead, AI-hyped executives "realize" that AI is doing all the work, so all the meat bags can be fired.
As no remains to tell CoPilot what to do, the company falters.
AI is truly going to take away our job, however, not in the way some envision.
-
Tuesday 5th May 2026 10:59 GMT DoctorPaul
One small ray of hope in the article
Despite their many appalling failures around the issue of actually paying claims, insurance companies have literally centuries of experience in dispassionately assessing risk.
Now if they all just say "we won't cover you if you use AI" what are businesses to do?
-