The Register Home Page

back to article You can now run WSL on Windows 95, in case you're crazy, too

The Windows Subsystem for Linux is an invaluable tool, but anyone wanting to run it on a Windows 9x system would find themselves out of luck until now. A self-described computer tinkerer and hacker calling herself Hailey presented what she called "one of my greatest hacks of all time" in a Mastodon post on Wednesday: The …

  1. QET

    This is so stupid and so goddamn crazy.

    Hell, it's batshit insanity incarnate, which no sane individual would ever attempt.

    And yet, I love it...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Crazy is relative.

      Like needing Linux functionality and running Windows 11. Or just running Windows 11.

      1. Jou (Mxyzptlk) Silver badge

        > Or just running Windows 11.

        TIFIFY

        1. David 132 Silver badge
          Happy

          And I'll point out that it's a Windows that doesn't need second-mortgage-spending levels of RAM. Perhaps an unexpected side-effect of the great AI scam is that us meatbags will all go back to using Windows 95, 3.x, and of course the One True Version, 2000?

          1. MyffyW Silver badge

            Windows 2000 was an NT version (NT5), and though I have fond memories of it they are at risk of being sullied by any comparison to 9x

            Personally, and I took a while to get there, I think Windows XP eventually became "the one true" Windows, partly based on it's longevity, but also because of all the NT heavy lifting done by NT 3.x, 4 and 2000

            1. milliemoo83

              One could argue that Server 2003 is "the one true" Windows - XP without the Mickey Mouse interface by default. Yes you can turn it off in XP, but it's more effort. Plus NT5.0 doesn't have to deal with activation, unlike NT5.1 and beyond. Which is why I also agree that 2000 is peak Windows.

      2. QET

        Windows 11's existence can best be described as brute force & ignorance incarnate.

        Ignorance in what the users of the operating system wanted and/or needed, versus what the powers there be at Microsoft decreed.

        And brute force in how it's being forced through despite user-base pushback and negative feedback.

    2. Pascal Monett Silver badge
      Thumb Up

      True digital art.

      I wish Hailey all the best.

      1. MyffyW Silver badge

        Hailey - if you're reading this - are you ok, Hun?

        Always here to talk

    3. BartyFartsLast Silver badge

      It's a plan,

      So crazy that it might work

      1. M. Poolman

        Re: It's a plan,

        It's a one in a million chance

    4. xc8

      yea weird project, I may try this under SunPC (4x86 SBUS card) on SPARCstation LX (Solaris 2.5.1)

      1. bazza Silver badge

        Oooo yes please, and report back!

    5. wolfetone Silver badge

      We put WSL in Windows 95 and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because it is fun.

  2. elsergiovolador Silver badge

    Best

    Best thing I read today.

  3. katrinab Silver badge
    Meh

    "The question of why one would want to do this came to mind quite quickly"

    Because you can is a perfectly good answer ...

    1. Ken Hagan Gold badge
      Happy

      I think in this case it is the only reasonable answer, since you can make Linux the bare metal OS and run Win9x in a VM. More fully featured. More stable. But a much less satisfying hack.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Pretty good career move in 2026 too.

        She has a real feather in her cap. Her competitors only have a school name and resume, which will quickly be summarized by the AI tasked with reducing the 999 other human applicants to datapoints.

  4. jpennycook Bronze badge

    "Not only does that mean security issues may result"

    It's DOS, there is no security!

    1. JoeCool Silver badge

      Re: "Not only does that mean security issues may result"

      It's Microsoft, there is no security!

  5. Jou (Mxyzptlk) Silver badge

    Can it run Linux?

    Yes, it can. After the "Can it run Doom" series on even most weird devices, this *SL aka <anything>SubsystemLinux is the next real challenge.

    1. Cruachan Silver badge

      Re: Can it run Linux?

      Now someone is going to start a challenge of can it run Doom under WSL under (insert OS or hardware device)?

    2. Frank Bitterlich

      Re: Can it run Linux?

      I was about to ask "Can it run Wine?", but then I remembered the "no GUI" part... what a pity.

  6. ExampleOne

    So she revived the coLinux approach and used it on Windows 9x?

    Still an impressive feat.

  7. An_Old_Dog Silver badge

    Alternatives

    There are freeware packages which give you various Unix/Linux shells which run under DOS, and there is Diomidis Spinellis' "Outwit95" which gives command-line programs access to the Windows clipboard.

  8. Bebu sa Ware Silver badge
    Thumb Up

    UML

    When I read this I immediately thought of user mode linux which I fiddled with years ago and thought was one of the cleverest hacks … potentially ever. I still have Jeff Dike's book somewhere.

    Checking https://codeberg.org/hails/wsl9x I see that it too leverages UML but full marks to hails (Hailey) for getting a UML kernel to work with the MSDOS Gui wrapper, Win9x.I rather imagine really much harder.

    1. FIA Silver badge

      Re: UML

      Yeah, I just came here to post similar....

      According to the WSL9x readme, the system is made up of three components: a Linux kernel patched to call Windows 9x APIs instead of POSIX ones, a VxD (virtual device) driver, and a WSL client itself.

      The bit missing from that sentence is it uses user mode Linux, hence why it would even be calling POSIX APIs.

  9. K. Adams
    Coat

    But will it run...

    ... under Wine?

    Jus' lemme nab me coat...

  10. anonymous boring coward Silver badge

    There must be an X server available for Windows 95, surely?

    1. Jou (Mxyzptlk) Silver badge

      There is. I used it. But don't ask where I lost it :D.

    2. LionelB Silver badge

      Well there certainly were a few; I recall Exceed (not sure if that still exists), or you could run X over Cygwin (which does still exist).

      1. bazza Silver badge

        ReflectionX was another, and was pretty good

  11. Denarius

    nice hack but been done before

    David Korn when at AT&T put out a unix subsystem for WinXP that also ran a bit diminished on Win98. Ran OK on Win7. Not tried it on Win10 but will look for the last release install package in my archives when trenching, fencing, sheep marking and sale done. Have a look on last year of ksh93 in USENET if Google kept mailing list. Server shut down years ago but code might still be archived somewhere.

    1. FIA Silver badge

      Re: nice hack but been done before

      There was also CoLinux too.

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Breaking news

    Slopya Nedella announces Copilot to be integrated into W95 and NT4

    Just in case anyone tries to run any Win environment without it.

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Soon we will have WSL running within W11 running within systemd and the circle will be complete.

  14. BPontius

    At a loss

    Struggling to find a reason to run Windows 95!!

    1. Denarius
      Coat

      Re: At a loss

      cheap reliable insecure small file server in M$ only totally isolated network. To be used by those unable to setup Wine without a whine. My coats the one with the Win95 reference in left pocket

  15. Zombine

    Akt headline: Linux ends support for 486, life finds a way

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon