Re: ISO certification VS security
I do consultancy work including for some very security & quality conscious military, aerospace and pharma organisations. I am usually asked if I am ISO 9001 certified (which I am not). If not, why not?
Simple, everything I do is a bespoke piece of work. No two sites or installations are identical.
To this end I have a small number of templates which contain basic details of the legislation that I am working to plus a layout format for each type of customer.
Some years ago I was quoted several £1,000s to "certify" me to 9001.
ISO 9001 is not a quality standard, it's a consistency standard, designed for people making widgets to a tolerance. It doesn't matter what the tolerance is, as long as you have a procedure for making the widgets and check that they are within the tolerance, even if the widgets (or a significant number of them) are so badly made that they are not fit for purpose.
One of my large company competitors lists compliance with several ISO standards including 9001, but one of their reports was recently rejected by UK HSE as being unfit for purpose! I know this because I was asked to re-do the work.
Several of their other reports I have seen were at a level that I would be ashamed to have written, but they have a "quality process" and therefore can be certified.