What is this cesium of which you speak?
I'm familiar with caesium though.
The British government is to pour £180 million into ensuring the UK keeps up with the times. Don't worry, it's not another cringeworthy effort to get down with the kids by putting Keir Starmer on TikTok. Rather, DSIT is funneling the cash toward the National Physical Laboratory's (NPL) National Timing Centre (NTC) to continue …
You can get it from Waitrose, apparently it's good.
(Although presumably this business has now passed to William as the current Duke of Cornwall? The Dutchy of Cornwall is in an odd legal position; sometimes it acts like a normal private business, and sometimes asserts Crown immunity to prosecution, which theoretically would allow Wills to avoid all sorts of laws, even including the Nuclear Explosions (Prohibition and Inspections) Act 1998.)
OP was talking about King Charles, who comes from a family that these days uses the name of the House of Windsor, but before that they were the House of Saxe-Cobug Gotha.
Of course, the royal family have been residents in the UK for many generations, and all the European royal families were so inbred they're practically all related (eg the King of Sweden is a fourth cousin to Chrales, and is in the line of succession for the British crown, although he'd have to bump off around two hundred people to become king).
Funnily enough, for a majority of requirements, the MSF radio time signal broadcast from Anthorn is good enough (although does not achieve the end point accuracy of atomic clocks). But there are people who go to the trouble of working out the propagation delay due to distance, so they must believe that it is possible to get significant accuracy from this system.
I did think thar Rugby, being more central to the country was a better location for this than Anthorn in Cumbria. But we could do with another broadcast location.
Most of the consumer grade off-the-shelf radio controlled clocks actually sync to the DCF77 time source from Mainflingen in Germany, as do any Meinberg radio controlled NTP appliances, however.
Anyway, been up the M1 to just before the M6 ext and seen the site of the old antenna farm? Wind turbines, warehouses, new housing and mud where something new is being built.
Where there is fields there is still guy-line anchors to be seen.
That was always something for me to look out for on our trips to the Lake District in my childhood.
MSF has sub-second accuracy, and the edge(s) of the final synchronising pulse is probably accurate to a millisecond or less (I used to know, memory is failing). The whole time 'packet' takes a minute to transmit, true, but it is the final pulse that actually signals the point in time to sync to.
A correctly configured MSF radio clock should wait for three consecutive good time packets before setting their internal clock.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugby_Radio_Station
Decommissioned.
Warehousing now with an expansion to DIRFT.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daventry_International_Rail_Freight_Terminal
Emergency Services BT/Cellnet//O2 Airwave project was based there until it moved to a new building in 2009 nearby as part of Macquarie (boo-hiss acquisition) and eventual disposal to Motorola.
If wikipedia is to be believed (I know, I know), the most northerly point of the UK is at 60 degrees N in the Shetland Islands and the most southerly is at 49.5 degrees N in the Scilly Isles. The mid-point between them is around 55 degrees N. That's approximately the latitude of Glasgow or Edinburgh. These cities are some 500km or so north of the supposedly "more central" Rugby.
BTW, having another broadcast location would complicate the problems of compensating for propagation delay. Unless you're equidistant from all the transmitters.
Shirley in you need a machine that goes ping for a new Atomic Clock, reutilise existing infrastructure that is nigh on ubiquitous and perhaps needing protection from tossers wanting to turn it off.
DTV (Freeview)
DAB
2G GPRS/telemetry or the (sucks ass) SmartMeter comms.
Conscious what you could doing the early 80’s with a BBC Micro and Teletext Adapter or (analogue) broadcast Basicode..
"using state-of-the-art cesium clocks; so accurate that it would take 160 million years for them to drift by just one second."
That's not the time keeping state-of-the-art! The current state of the art is around one second in 30 billion years - longer than the current age of the Universe. And they're working on a way to make them ten times more accurate.
Somerset is a county in SW England. It has a reputation for being a rather "backwoods" area. When I lived in Canada they would make jokes about Newfoundland. I think people south of the 49th think about Louisiana in a similar way.
Although I would never live there now, I used to live outside Taunton which is the county town (kind of a state capital) in Somerset and it was pleasant enough apart from a pub called the Plough where the farmers would drink what they had made form selling their stock at Taunton market and things would get a bit lively.
IIUC, that transmitter didn't do time signals: just the pips on Radio 4 before broadcasting The Archers to a grateful(?) planet.
Long wave transmissions from Droitwich look doomed anyway. The BBC has or will soon stop LW broadcasting. The transmitters need valves(!) which are no longer being made.
Perhaps I don't understand, but Europe has Galileo GNSS and need not rely on the Americans for GPS. Is that insufficient?
Also, if Europe's GNSS is insufficient, then why isn't this a Europe-wide initiative? Accurate timekeeping is really important, and also something which scales well.
In terms of someone turning it off in a fit of political pique, yes.
However, there could be other situations where a lot of satellites are lost (Carrington event part deux, atom bomb in orbit, etc) that impact all, and also they all share the same band of RF frequencies so local jamming of all systems is a risk for some critical users.
Every country (of a certain size. Leichtenstein & Monaco less so) ought to have a robust timing capability, so no great coordination needed there. We already have a good capability but a distributed network is no bad thing. £180m is a noddy sum to Government given the chaos that would ensue from time drift (the NHS in England & Wales spends >£350m/day).
What would need more coordination would be rolling out something like eLORAN to lighthouses/nav points as a terrestrial fallback from GNSS. Trinity House discontinued their eLORAN trials in 2015, alongside partners in France and Norway. They knocked off their DGPS network in 2022 on the basis multi-constellation GNSS and RAIM (Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring) were adequate. In the scheme of things, the cost of a dozen DGPS and eLORAN base stations is trivial as a backup to satellite systems.
Quantum lattice or quantum gas clocks are something like a thousand times more accurate than the best nuclear clocks. This is accurate enough to be able to measure time dilation differences over a few feet in change of height
In terms of GPS equivalent, you could tell position to within a few centimetres. That might sound useless to you, but I could imagine that trying to navigate a smoke-filled room to reach an emergency exit, a few cm versus a few metres might make a big difference.
Or, for construction work or archaeology, if you're looking to avoid a gas pipe, a few metres out can be the difference between the hole in the ground you want and a much bigger hole in the ground you don't want.
If you're going to be building the next gen clock, it does not make sense to be making the smallest possible increment. At that cost, go for the very best you can do.
could run on sundials for their scheduling.
The bus on a local service has a display screen for the route and upcoming stops which displays UK civil time and a route somewhere near London which is dandy but for the fact the bus is on the other side of the planet.
Unlike most of the local services it is runs mostly on time and the time on the screen is correct within a second once the timezone and UK summertime offset are taken into account — I suppose it is the stopped clock principle at work (when all the forces of fuckedness converge on a point even the totally broken works.)
Murcan Anguish: Hale Cesium ? or Heil Kaiserium ? Stopped clocks ?
Good.
Now drop some cash with Trinity House to pick up their eLORAN trials. Trinity House discontinued their Initial Operating Capability in 2015, alongside partners in France and Norway. They knocked off their DGPS network in 2022 on the basis multi-constellation GNSS and RAIM (Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring) were adequate.
DGPS probably isn't actually needed - either you have GNSS (multi-constellation, RAIM) or you don't, and if you do, then it's highly precise these days. For maritime, the integrity/anti-spoof provision within DGPS was as important as the improvements to positioning. If you don't, eLORAN would be handy.
In the scheme of things, the cost of a dozen eLORAN base stations as a backup to satellite systems is trivial.
For a tech news site I would have expected a bit more tech than just "180 million quid on new time stuff". A link to the actual nuts & bolts of the proposal would have been good. Perhaps there isn't one and this is all government vapourware so far?
This NPL press release is the only thing I could find with a quick look, and that is as vapid as the article.
One of the reasons this is necessary is Brexit. A lot of networks, crucially mobile phone networks use GPS for sync. A mobile phone cell doesn't need GPS to know where it is, it needs it to know when it is. This allows cells to cope with sharing users who do move, and managing handoff. It doesn't even need the time, it just needs a heartbeat in sync with nearby cells.
Having sovereign ownership of a GNSS system is an important part of Critical National Infrastructure. Since we left Europe we were no longer linked to Galileo so no longer have that sovereign ownership. The first thing the government did was piss half a billion up the wall on One Web (https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/03/uk_buys_oneweb/) but that doesn't give the sync we need. It's even more crucial because thanks also to Brexit we are not part of IRIS² (https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/16/europe_iris2_broadband_deal) so have no Plan B. IRIS² exists to be a completely independent communications network in time of war to provide an alternative to terrestrial networks.
It's because of these two Brexit-dictated weaknesses in our communications networks that we need a terrestrial way of providing sync. Hence, the spending with NPL.
Brexit Bonus? Nope.
I hope NPL use servers and internet connectiions with better jitter than their current system:
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
=======================================================================================================
xSHM(0) .GPS. 0 l 1 16 377 0.0000 -568.364 8.6148
*SHM(1) .PPS. 0 l 8 16 377 0.0000 0.0045 0.0155
-ns0.thorcom.net .PPS. 1 u 4 64 273 12.7072 0.9278 0.0505
-ns1.thorcom.net .PPS. 1 u 23 64 377 12.7883 0.9570 0.0289
#ntpsvr1.npl.co.uk .MBGh. 1 u 32 64 377 7.1318 0.1494 118.2485
+ntpsvr2.npl.co.uk .MBGh. 1 u 42 64 377 6.9659 0.0953 0.0416
-ntp1.ja.net .MRS. 1 u 58 64 377 13.6484 1.1012 0.1401
-ntp2.ja.net 194.210.37.76 2 u 37 64 377 12.7824 0.8646 0.0297
-swale.mc.man.ac.uk 193.62.22.66 2 u 66 64 377 13.5371 0.2244 0.1891
-ntp0.cam.ac.uk 197.205.52.7 2 u 39 64 367 8.2084 -0.0374 0.0431
+ntp1.cam.ac.uk 128.232.103.138 2 u 51 64 377 8.1991 0.0046 0.0209
-dns1.eng.cam.ac.uk 128.232.103.138 2 u 60 64 377 7.7601 0.1284 0.1273
#ntp0.cis.strath.ac.uk 193.62.22.90 2 u 27 64 377 16.6419 -1.0449 0.0308
#time-d-g.nist.gov .NIST. 1 u 50 64 377 84.0142 -0.1160 1.6425
#time-d-b.nist.gov .NIST. 1 u 14 64 277 119.5323 -1.0417 0.0365
ntpq>