Strange world
Selling off part of your profit-creating assets raises company value. I'll definitively never understand business...
Accenture is going to get a closer look into how web traffic is moving...or not moving. The company has announced plans to buy Downdetector parent company Ookla from Ziff Davis as part of a package deal with other software for $1.2 billion. The purchase will enhance the consulting megalith's intelligence and analytics tools, …
> the intention to reduce corporate debt
Of course, but where is the benefit if by reducing debt you also reduce future profits?
In both cases future profits will be lower. Maybe the sold assets did earn you less than you would spend to pay off the debt over a period, but I don't see how that difference could be big enough to make the share value increase by 81 percent! Nah, definitely unable to understand the logic...
Share value increases in the short term because flogging off the assets increases the cash in the coffers. It does fuck all for the future, but they don't give a shit about long term health.
This is just how corporate finance seems to work now. Assets are for stripping. (Or sweating to death, the other side of the coin).
Its "Jam Today" or "Eating your cake" thinking.
Place I worked started to flog off loads of physical assets to pay off debt and sweeten shareholders.
I raised at the time that the balance sheet is simply "assets over liabilities" and you can only sell those assets once. Predictably, most of the liabilities remained and the balance sheet became unbalanced!
Of course the finance whizz CFO by that time was long gone, with his share options and fat pay packet!
If my company was worth $3 billion and it had a division valued at $1 billion I sold for $1.2 billion, shouldn't my company now be valued at $3.2 billion?
I don't know how much profit Downdetector and so forth make, but it is hard to imagine that stuff is really worth $1.2 billion. Maybe it worth it worth more to Accenture because it can be leveraged to help their government contracting work (which if true means it is bad for us)
And probably their best tech journos didn't make the money some idiotic "influencer" does just opening a box on youtube... but actually you had to pay to read them.
Anyway, when I started reading PC Magazine the internet for everybody was yet to come... most PCs didn't even had a network card or a modem.