back to article US struck Iran with copies of its own drones

The Pentagon has confirmed that US forces struck Iranian targets using weapons that are copies of Iran's own Shahed 136 suicide drones. When Operation Epic Fury began on the morning of February 28, involved in the action was Task Force Scorpion Strike, the US military's first one-way-attack drone squadron, based in the Middle …

  1. VoiceOfTruth Silver badge

    Proof this was long planned

    The USA didn't start this war based on negotiations which broke down.

    It's another in the USA's long list of wars it started.

    1. elsergiovolador Silver badge
      Trollface

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      At least the press isn't droning about Epstein anymore and that the files with Trump have gone missing.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        Though it does seem a bit of an over reaction just to deflect attention away from Epstein ...

        1. elsergiovolador Silver badge

          Re: Proof this was long planned

          He tried with declassifying aliens stuff but somehow it was a damp squib.

          But given that Krasnov is in Putin's pocket, the war with Iran plays into Russian hands very well. India is already considering resuming buying oil from Russia and with prices likely going up, Krasnov got himself few weeks off the hook and his master happy.

          1. Ken Hagan Gold badge

            Re: Proof this was long planned

            I think it is unlikely that the Pentagon has not considered the medium term impact on the global oil trade. 20% of that trade runs through the Strait of Hormuz.

            So, either the US expects the Strait to re-open within a few weeks or they have a plan B. It seems absurd to imagine that the current Iranian regime would tolerate plan A so regime change would be necessary for that to happen. Plan B involves finding 20% of the world's oil requirements in a space of weeks. Of course, Venezuela is now "friendly" but it seems unlikely that it could ramp up in just a few weeks.

            I conclude that the Pentagon planners are going for plan A and regime change is now an essential part of the US strategy, whatever they might be saying in public.

            1. elsergiovolador Silver badge

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              Pentagon is also compromised. For sure they considered how it will benefit Putin.

            2. VoiceOfTruth Silver badge

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              The regime that needs changing is the Trump regime. Ask Canada. Ask Denmark.

              This is just another oil war started by the USA.

              1. LucreLout Silver badge

                Re: Proof this was long planned

                America isn't a regime.lol. Hilarious.

                America is our most important global ally. It just is. And all the bile from the usual suspects in these parts isn't going to change that. Even in the earliest days where we all ended up on a labour watch list because of the extreme leftist reactionaries that made up the commentariat back then.

                1. JPCavendish

                  Re: Proof this was long planned

                  "because of the extreme leftist reactionaries that made up the commentariat back then"

                  Most of them are still here...

                2. chololennon
                  Facepalm

                  Re: Proof this was long planned

                  > America isn't a regime.lol. Hilarious.

                  YES IT WAS, YET IT IS (more than ever).

                3. Benegesserict Cumbersomberbatch Silver badge

                  Re: Proof this was long planned

                  Regime is simply a word for the system of power in a country, the people in power and the policy exercised through it. Every country with a government has a regime; it suits propaganda agencies to use that word because it has implications that the power is being misused.

                  When government agents kill citizens exercising their lawful rights, power is being abused, whatever word one chooses to describe the mechanism by which it happens.

            3. Dan 55 Silver badge

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              I'm sure the Pentagon gave all of their detailed reports of all the different wargamed scenarios they've carried out over the years to Trump, who reads them all of them back to back and carefully deliberates the best course of action before taking a decision.

              1. Benegesserict Cumbersomberbatch Silver badge

                Re: Proof this was long planned

                It was opportunism based on Israeli intelligence identifying Khamenei, the head of the Revolutionary Guard and the Defence Chief of Staff in the same place at the same time. When Israel anted with Decapita, the US said I'll see your Decapita and raise you a Regime Change. Because polling.

              2. that one in the corner Silver badge

                Re: Proof this was long planned

                DJT will carefully examine each item placed before him and autograph it: "Who should I make it out to? Pete - can you spell that for me?"

            4. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              The Pentagon can make plans about Iran but what plans can they make about their CinC's ad hoc decision making?

            5. kmorwath Silver badge

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              They don't care, and they may be happy too.

              - Oil and gas can't reach those pesky Europeans? USA is ready to sell it (now US has a lot of Venezuelan one)!

              - Chinese goods can't reach Europe easily? Win!

              - EU can't export to China and other countries in Asia? Win.Win!

              - Putin makes more money from oil and gas? Our comrade needs some help to finish that "special operation" in Ukraine, so Trump can say it ended another war!!

              Europe shoud send a fleet to protect traffic and keep it going, but of course, it won't.

            6. Havoc71

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              There was a plan??

            7. rg287 Silver badge

              Re: Proof this was long planned

              I think it is unlikely that the Pentagon has not considered the medium term impact on the global oil trade.

              For sure. They've considered it. Trump hasn't.

              So, either the US expects the Strait to re-open within a few weeks or they have a plan B.

              Lol. Plan B? The first part is right. They thought they'd lob a few missiles, kill the Supreme Leader (Khamenei, not Trump) and then Iran would roll over and elect a new - friendly-ish - leader like Venezuela did. Turns out they've learned absolutely f-ing nothing from Ukraine since 2022 about the new face of warfare (i.e. drones).

              There is no strategy from Trump - just (re)action. The Turkish have been itching to kick the US out of Incirlik air base. Taking heat from Iran because they host the US is only going to harden that. They've already been booted out of the F35 programme, so no need to cosy up to Trump for that. Cue various Middle Eastern states saying "hey, will you stop lobbing rockets at-and-around these bases if we kick out the Yanks?".

              The only way to do regime change in Iran is by boots on the ground - a trillion dollar commitment no smaller than that of Iraq or Afghan. Trump won't likely do that. He thought he was going to do a "special military operation" and be in and out in a few days, not understanding that what he did in Venezuela was not a military operation - it was a military-enabled policing action. There is a sequence of events here where the US ends up making an ignominious withdrawal, and potentially ending (or significantly scaling back) it's military presence in the region because they're no longer welcome or useful. Korea and Japan are also reassessing whether it's actually helpful to be hosting US bases.

              Trump is speed-running the end of the US hegemony, and applying to join Israel as a pariah state.

              The other consequence to this is where Israel goes. Netenyahu the nutter has talked about his "seven fronts" - as if Israel can sustain substantive operations simultaneously in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon (x2), Yemen, Syria and Iran long term. They already have a problem with reservists not reporting for duty, and there's domestic division where regular Israelis are losing patience at the service exemption for Haredi scholars. The question is how hard Iran goes chaos monkey on Israel and whether they turn from "nuisance" to "Tel Aviv actually thinks about nuking them because they've run out of conventional forces." Israel definitely can't do boots-on-the-ground, at which point we can expect to see an intervention from Russia, India or China laying down the consequences (for both Israel and the USA) if Israel does something truly stupid - this intervention is frankly overdue given that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza worse than the Serbs managed in Bosnia in the 1990s - when the US belatedly entered the fray and convinced Russia to cut support and militarily starve the Bosnian Serb's campaign of ethnic cleansing.

        2. kmorwath Silver badge

          a bit of an over reaction just to deflect attention

          Clinton bombed around there too to keep away press interests from his own affairs with women, it's not a new tactic....

          1. Anonymous Coward Silver badge
            Mushroom

            Re: a bit of an over reaction just to deflect attention

            Trump himself knew it was a viable tactic as back in 2012 & 2013 he was claiming that Obama would bomb Iran because his popularity was tanking.

            1. notyetanotherid

              Re: a bit of an over reaction just to deflect attention

              e.g. this one at 7:48 pm on 29 Nov 2011:

              In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran.

          2. LazLong

            Afghanistan

            It was bin Laden and his training camps who was attacked in Afghanistan, and idiot Republitards said it was simply to distract from Lewinsky. Then the Bush admin ignored the outgoing Clinton admin's advice re bin Laden.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        The MAGA faithful

        Call it Operation Epstein Fury. That should give you a clue that only the most sycophantic Trump suppprters think it's great to go after Iran for not being grateful for the 10 years of uranium enrichment Trump gave them when in 2016 he tore up the 2015 agreement, and that only recently wanted them to sign back up to.

        No doubt Eric & Trump jr, patiots that they are like Daddy Bone Spurs, are.on their way to the military recuitment center to enlist.

        1. Casca Silver badge

          Re: The MAGA faithful

          Operation Epstein Furry

      3. DS999 Silver badge

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        At least the press isn't droning about Epstein anymore and that the files with Trump have gone missing

        Yes, for the moment. Trump is so stupid he thinks he can make Epstein go away with his foreign adventurism. No one has forgotten about Epstein and the fact that Trump fucked kids and is covering up the evidence. Once either the war ends or it becomes too much of "same news everyday" that pushed Ukraine and Palestine off the news even when those wars continued Epstein will be back and Trump will be panicking and looking for the next distraction. All the while digging republicans a deeper and deeper hole for the midterms.

        1. HereIAmJH Silver badge

          Re: Proof this was long planned

          Trump will be panicking and looking for the next distraction.

          Well, there is no Trump resort in Cuba.

          1. Casca Silver badge

            Re: Proof this was long planned

            So far...

          2. that one in the corner Silver badge

            Re: Proof this was long planned

            What about that cosy hotel that Trump is building right on the bay down in the south eastern corner of Cuba?

          3. DS999 Silver badge

            Re: Proof this was long planned

            Too bad there are no Trump hotels in the Middle East. Because you know Iran would bomb those into rubble, and insurance companies would likely find some clause somewhere to deny his insurance claim based on the fact they were destroyed in a war he started.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      I think you'll find it's been in the planning stage since Jimmy Carter was president ....

    3. herman Silver badge

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      The military has plans for everything. They are constantly making and updating plans. That is what the Pentagon does. Having s good plan ready does not mean that war is imminent - it just means that they are prepared.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        > The military has plans for everything

        It sort of comes and goes:

        2017: What Happens If Hostile Aliens Attack? The US Military Has a Team in Place

        2024: Watchdog warns the US has no planes to defend against alien invasion despite UFO influx

        2026: Trump directs US government to prepare release of files on aliens and UFOs

        (Latest news: Trump has finally seen some of the material that he has ordered to be released, along with the DoW's current plans; suddenly needing to take the public's eyes away from the alien preparedness issue...)

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        > The military has plans for everything.

        Everything except exit strategies, it seems.

        1. David Hicklin Silver badge

          Re: Proof this was long planned

          >> The military has plans for everything.

          > Everything except exit strategies, it seems.

          Sadly very true unless you can win convincingly

      3. kmorwath Silver badge

        The military has plans for everything.

        Plans based on assumptions like:

        - Afghani army will resit to the Talibans for six-nine months

        - Putin won't invade Ukraine (OK, he got Crimea already, should be enough)

        ?

      4. Tim99 Silver badge

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth” - Attributed to Mike Tyson and others.

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      but... Trump ended 8 wars, so that means he's allowed to start up to 7 new ones and still be in the running for that nobel peace prize, yes?

      1. kmorwath Silver badge

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        He starts wars just to end them later and take credit for it.

        1. WolfFan Silver badge

          Re: Proof this was long planned

          That’s called the Kissinger Gambit. It worked for Henry…

    5. MJI

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      To take heat off the trump-epstein files.

    6. tip pc Silver badge

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      The national security advisor, Marco Rubio, explained why they launched preemptive strikes against Iran.

      Looks like the dog was wagged.

      https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2028576202420535469?s=20

      1. Stork

        Re: Proof this was long planned

        Isn't Rubio Secretary of State? But yes, he said they could not let israel have all the fun

    7. Tim99 Silver badge
      Unhappy

      Re: Proof this was long planned

      It's what they do. In the 250 years since 1776 they have been at war (and other military engagements) for 225 years (90%). In comparison, the UK (even with its colonial past) over the same period it's less than 90 years.

  2. Brewster's Angle Grinder Silver badge

    I'll have what she's having

    "We find it difficult to believe that the US couldn't have developed its own one-way attack drone, so perhaps it was just more cost-effective to copy what was already known to work?"

    You hit the nail on the head there. The usual suspects would have charged $billions and it would have ended up including a holographic projector to disguise itself by the time everyone had had their say. Much easier to point at an existing model and say "give us some of them". The Iranians gave them the specification.

    1. Adam Azarchs

      Re: I'll have what she's having

      I think the real reason might be that if Iran were to capture one of these drones, they wouldn't learn anything from it.

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        Re: I'll have what she's having

        When they see one flying overhead how do they know whose it is? Either they let some US ones through or take down some of their own.

        1. kmorwath Silver badge

          Re: I'll have what she's having

          IFFs are your friend (or foe).

        2. Anonymous Coward Silver badge
          Holmes

          Re: I'll have what she's having

          If it's heading towards you, it's one of theirs. If it's heading away from you, it's one of yours.

          (excluding any "friendly fire" incidents, but IFF and the like don't help there either)

        3. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: I'll have what she's having

          They have listening posts that can tell the difference in the sounds the drones make: is it playing "America, Fuck Yeah!" or "Fuck America" - subtle but useful to know.

    2. shinean

      Re: I'll have what she's having

      I thought I saw quotes in the press around the time the Ukraine War started that Shaheds cost only about $20,000 per when Russia buys them from Iran. Yet the U.S. reverse-engineered version costs $35,000. So yeah, it's cheaper than a $1.5 million Tomahawk, but still its seems the Military-Industrial Complex is ripping U.S. taxpayers off.

      1. kmorwath Silver badge

        Re: I'll have what she's having

        Well, Iranian workers are cheaper than US ones. Now, if US can outsource them to China as well...

      2. Casca Silver badge

        Re: I'll have what she's having

        Its not a direct clone. They have upgraded some part of it so I imagine that would also drive up the price.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: I'll have what she's having

          Also, US has to use emissions compliant engines that aren't stolen. You know, can't do kinetic if you are polluting too much or have a dirty supply chain.

  3. herman Silver badge

    Actually the US has lots of those kind of lower cost things in service, including glide bombs that you can toss out the back of a C130 and rocket launched glide bombs. Nuff sed.

    1. sured

      I remember putting hand grenades in styrofoam cups.

  4. Fruit and Nutcase Silver badge
    Mushroom

    Peace Prize

    Will Gianni Infantino be asking Trump to return the FIFA Peace Prize?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Peace Prize

      Several people have remarked on the phrase "bored of peace" as Trump's problem. The 25 countries signed up for the "Board of Peace" might be having second thoughts, yes?

      But the simplest reaction ought to be "Oh, that's why they renamed it to the Department of War!"

    2. kmorwath Silver badge

      Re: Peace Prize

      The board of peace exists only to pay for the privilege to have a "peaceful" relationship with Trump.

  5. goblinski Silver badge

    Well, the circle is complete, or almost...

    1980s: Germany's Dornier DAR (Die Drohne Antiradar) > Israel's IAI Harpy > South Africa's Kentron ARD-10 during the Border War > design data sold to Israel = all proud parents of the Shahed-131/136 (possibly spawned from either Chinese units - that Israel exported to China - or captured Israeli ones) > LUCAAASSS !!!

  6. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

    So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

    Speed? Manoeuverability? Human in the loop control?

    1. Dan 55 Silver badge

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      The missile isn't a suicide missile.

    2. Dinanziame Silver badge
      IT Angle

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      The rocket engine, I assume?

      1. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

        Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

        Many cruise missiles (e.g. the Tomahawk) are powered by a jet engine

    3. herman Silver badge

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      The difference is in the background of the news reporter. Legally, a UAV with a range over 300 km is a Class 1 missile.

    4. Paul Dx

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      Drone's can be used for recon or hitting something, missiles are only used to hit something - rendering suicide moot

    5. Hurn

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      But isn't "Kamikaze* Drone" so much "cooler"?

      * Divine Wind - because, it flies, is on a "Mission from God"(TM), and sends martyrs to Paradise, where they are issued 72 virgins (each).

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

        But the virgins are 400lb swamp dwellers with slightly higher IQ than number of teeth and piles.

    6. James O'Shea Silver badge

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      One's Islamic ('La ilaha illa Allah!') and one isn't.

    7. goblinski Silver badge

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      ...So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?...

      Weeelll...

      THE MISSILE KNOWS WHERE IT IS AT ALL TIMES. IT KNOWS THIS BECAUSE IT KNOWS WHERE IT ISN'T!!!

      By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile FROM A POSITION WHERE IT IS TO A POSITION WHERE IT ISN'T, and arriving at a position WHERE IT WASN'T, IT NOW IS.

      Consequently, THE POSITION WHERE IT IS, IS NOW THE POSITION THAT IT WASN'T, and it follows that THE POSITION THAT IT WAS, IS NOW THE POSITION THAT IT ISN'T.

      In the event that THE POSITION THAT IT IS IN IS NOT THE POSITION THAT IT WASN'T, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHERE THE MISSILE IS, AND WHERE IT WASN'T.

      If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, IT IS NOT SURE JUST WHERE IT IS.

      HOWEVER, IT IS SURE WHERE IT ISN'T, within reason, and it knows where it was.

      IT NOW SUBTRACTS WHERE IT SHOULD BE FROM WHERE IT WASN'T, OR VICE VERSA, and by differentiating this FROM THE ALGEBRAIC SUM OF WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE, AND WHERE IT WAS, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

      Whereas a suicide drone just goes "Prrrrrrrrrrrrr"...

      1. Stork

        Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

        I liked AManFromMars better

    8. CrazyOldCatMan Silver badge

      Re: So what's the difference between a cruise missile and a "suicide drone"?

      Cost.

      And speed, payload types (can't put a tacnuke on a suicide drone) and survivability. Cruise missile is a lot faster and more agile than the drone as well as being a lot smarter

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    After Trump's complaints about foreign states stealing American IP

    We WILL be seeing the US paying proper licence fees to the Iranians for these designs, won't we?

    1. Dr Paul Taylor

      Re: After Trump's complaints about foreign states stealing American IP

      don't the Trumpistanis have laws against reverse engineering?

      1. Peter Gathercole Silver badge

        Re: After Trump's complaints about foreign states stealing American IP

        I think the US military are exempt from those regulations.

        1. Casca Silver badge

          Re: After Trump's complaints about foreign states stealing American IP

          They got sued by Bofors after WWII for manufacturing of 40mm AA without a license and lost so I 'm not sure.

    2. HereIAmJH Silver badge
      Joke

      Re: After Trump's complaints about foreign states stealing American IP

      We could include a dollar royalty with every one sent.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    I thought it was called Operation Epstein’s Fury.

    1. Pussifer
      Happy

      Might become to be known as Operation Epic Fail

      Who names this stuff, and doesn't anyone think of the possibilities for it to be renamed to something funny or derogatory?

      1. Jonathan Richards 1 Silver badge

        Mystery not marketing

        The original purpose of giving operations code names is exactly that of any code: to obscure the planning and objectives from being observed by the enemy. Once someone has told you which military operation has which code name, that purpose is lost, so in this instance they seem to have gone straight for something that Hegseth thought would play well with Fox News bulletins.

        Operation Market Garden comes to mind, being the effort to capture the Rhine bridges at Arnhem (1944). Glory naming was not the fashion back then.

        1. Stork

          Re: Mystery not marketing

          I heard a story of a young officer who came up with Operation Sweaty Gecko. Even if it indicated absolutely nothing about the purpose, his superiors were somehow not happy.

          Back to the ongoing one, I am sure other readers can also come up with a fair number of substitutes for "Fury", even if they have to start with F

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon