But wait...
...Where are the cup holders?
If you own a desktop computer, you're used to swapping parts and peripherals around, but most laptops are closed boxes with few ways to modify them. Lenovo's new ThinkBook Modular AI PC concept shows what happens when you can remove a screen, a keyboard, and even blocks of ports from a mobile PC. The computer maker is showing …
Yeah, true. Had the same idea reading this. No doubt, the marketing bros ordered one, threw it on the table with PD and told them "Death! Doom! We have to do something! Otherwise I can't make any money!™" PS - Did anyone ask them how long "the support period" is going to be..? You know, like parts availability and all that triviality..?
Also look very proprietary and liable to change for each model… just like laptop desk docks…
It does seem time the PCMCIA concept is refreshed: Standard sized slot and connector, Standard bus interface, slot within the laptop frame so that added gizmo/port adaptor fits within the dimensions of the laptop, removing the need to carry an external multi-port that has to be reconnected every time it’s needed and also requires a power supply…
The video also struck me as odd for a “concept”.
1. The add-on screen is attached via a cable, not Bluetooth.
2. The add-on screen was only demonstrated in landscape, it would be really good for it to both support portrait and support auto rotate - a feature that has been standard on tablets since the first iPad in 2010.
3. That back-to-back screen is going to be a real security/privacy issue if it’s normal mode is screen mirroring.
The add-on screen is attached via a cable, not Bluetooth.
I'm pretty sure Bluetooth has nowhere near the bandwidth to support an external screen. Most "wireless" screen mirroring uses WiFi of some description, and in my experience even that is prone to things like lag. I have trialled an expensive, proprietary (from a big Japanese manufacturer), WiFi-based screen cast/share system. Stand-alone transmitter(s) and receiver, 5GHz WiFi, sets up its own network after scanning for existing ones. The lag is several seconds and the data rate struggles with video in a window and cannot handle full-screen high definition video without dropping frames, the lag also means that audio (if the laptop is plugged directly into the room PA) is completely out of sync with the video. And this in a small room with maybe 5m between transmitter and receiver and a projector which is only 1280x800.
I mean, it works ok from the kids' phones to the living room TV (still some lag though), but it's not ideal. Good for sharing photographs (so long as they weren't taken in portrait mode!) A wire is much better and can also carry power :-)
I've met some non-WiFi solutions that work ok, but then you are probably looking at proprietary use of one of the licence-free frequencies, which quite possibly interferes with WiFi too.
M.
Totally agree with the problemsif using the wireless to stream video and games, but for more typical office desktop usage… However, remember this was a “concept” demonstrator laptop and the tethered screen clearly is intended to be used within 1.5M of the system unit.
I suspect in real terms this is simply a lightly modified Lenovo Legend with a Lenovo Mobile Monitor (minus the battery pack stand and independent power supply - hence need for peg leg and cable connection). So more of a “cheap” to manufacture variant that might be manufactured if there is sufficient interest and developed further if there are sufficient sales..
the effing eh-aye?
My immediate thought too.
A properly modular system you should have the option of choosing modules without AI support.
Or even choice of CPU and GPU architectures. In Wonderland the interfaces between modules would be an open spec. to which specialised third party modules might be developed.
The display LCD was removable from the backlight, and could be placed on an overhead projector to show graphs and other such things on a larger screen.
I was told it cost around $10,000 at the time. These days it's easier and cheaper to buy a good projector to run with your laptop instead.
correction: Whilst the ThinkPad 755CV could indeed be placed on an OHP, the display itself could not be detached from the main/keyboard unit. The whole thing was a bit of a Heath Robinson affair, with the use of the supplied staps to secure the laptop onto the OHP.
755CDV on a OHP (CDV - with CD-ROM drive) https://thinkwiki.de/Datei:755cdv-overhead.jpg
IIRC, Siemens had a laptop around the same time/a bit earlier which had a completely detachable display unit, which was then connected to the main unit via a cable (supplied) - that is probably a better fit for what the OP mentioned.
Confuse them further - my mathematical analysis lecturer (lat 1970s) used the continuous scroll feature these had when loaded with a roll of acetate to do his demonstration proofs: you had to keep up with your note taking, otherwise the line you wanted will have been scrolled off the screen.
otherwise the line you wanted will have been scrolled off the screen
But at least it would have been preserved on the roll so you could potentially ask to review it after the lecture. I had several teachers at school who took pride in writing right around the rolling blackboards and of course, wiping the early work in order to make space for later jottings. Maths in particular but on one memorable occasion, history. The teacher was very cross with us for some reason and wrote over four panels of blackboard in the course of a 40 minute lesson - the blackboard had three panels.
M.
This post has been deleted by its author
The modular Thinkbook is a fun idea, although as commented above my first thought on seeing swappable I/O was "That looks like a Framework design"
One very good thing to note on the ThinkPads is that Lenovo still have a separate power button, rather than stuffing it onto the keyboard like everyone else bloody does. At least they haven't fallen down that dumb rabbit-hole on these models. (my work-issued 2021 Dell Latitude has a keyboard mounted power button and it's intensely irritating, given it replaced the delete key location....!)
Going by the photos, repairability looks about the same as the 14" HP Elitebook G2 I'm typing this on, which weighs about the same and has similar dimensions. However the ThinkPad looks to need more tools than this HP to do something basic like swapping RAM or the battery.
Curious to note that the only Intel CPU offering is the Ultra 3, with no performant Ultra 5 or Ultra 7 options. Wonder if they had issues keeping the higher clocked chips cool...
Presumably you spec the AMD CPU if more grunt is required.
What I’d really like in a laptop is a power button that can be operated without opening the lid. I usually use laptops exclusively with external screens and monitors, and no I can’t just buy a desktop because I also need it be portable for when I’m not sat at a desk at home.
I usually use laptops exclusively with external screens
M.
(how can you "usually" use something "exclusively"?)
I've literally just taken a T60 apart last weekend (needed to replace a failing WiFi card).
You can replace the hard disk, and optical disk without opening the system up, and the memory, and network cards once you take the wrist rest and keyboard off, but CPU/GPU are not so easy, although I believe they are still socketed on the T60. Also, all the I/O and power ports are all on the base planar. And replacing the screen is quite challenging.
But the biggest problem with the T60? Well, it's the chipset, that only allows you to use 3GB of memory, no matter how much is installed (I have two, each with 2x2GB SODIMMs. They only see 3GB of the memory, and reserve some of that for the display). Fortunately, this one is just being used for basic Internet access, and runs Linux.
It's really a bit of a shame, as to my knowledge, they were the last T series Thinkpads to have a 4x3 (or was it 5x4) screen. That is why I'm still managing one, as my wife just cannot get on with 16x9 or 16x10 screens. I tried to get her to use a 2012 Macbook Pro (running Ubuntu), but she didn't like the keyboard and the lack of a trackpoint. It's strange, she can use the trackpoint, but struggles with a touchpad.
It was really quite refreshing to use a screen that filled the lid of the laptop. I'd forgotten what it was like. I then switched back to my T420 (the last Thinkpad that had a 'proper' non-island key keyboard, although I understand you can put a T420 keyboard on a T430), and the pain of not having enough vertical space when the font was readable just flooded back.
Huh. Ain't that a shock.
The T60 I'm looking at has a Core Duo T2400. That's a 32 bit processor! No wonder it tops out at no more that 3GB. I always thought it was a 64 bit system. Must check the one my wife is using.
I wonder whether the MoBo is capable of taking a Socket 479 Core 2 Duo. Or even whether it is worth doing it (although it does have the 1400x1050 screen, so that may be a reason).
The T60 was definitely limited to 32-bit processors and 3 GB of RAM due to the Intel chipset.
There was a few years back there was a FrankenPad which put the newer T61 motherboard in the (higher quality) T60 chassis. I’ve not had cause to look in recent years, but many key parts/assemblies were still available from Lenovo, need to search carefully as you probably don’t want the part number of the part installed in your system, but the newer revised part which will have a totally different part number.
The 1400x1050 screen in the T60 14-inch definitely was something worth having, still miss it. The T60 fitted airplane and train seat back trays, fully using the available space. Okay not good for films etc. but really good for document production.
My experience of Lenovo gear leaves me with the impression that they CAN make really good kit, but often choose to produce crap. I did wonder whether this is down to Lenovo outsourcing production to second and third tier assemblers in China, such that the only Lenovo content was the name on the box, but I can't offer any solid evidence for that. Either way, I steer clear of their products now.
"2.45 to 2.66 pounds while being only 0.7 inches thick. "
"a few tenths of a pound heavier and about 0.1 inch thicker."
"3.62 pounds and it's almost an inch thick."
All very informative, I am sure, but what about those of us who have moved on from imperial weights and measures?
A quick conversion in kilos and centimetres would not have come amiss.
I also like the way that the modular laptop is a "chunky 0.94 inches" while the "sleek" T14s is "only 0.7 inches". Granted, that's 6mm or so, but I do find it interesting how this kind of language is used, especially when the "chunky" laptop seems to be 0.16 pounds lighter (or in more understandable terms, about 2½oz = 70g) than the "sleekest" model, and both have 14" screens.
Saw a bit of an old episode of Midsomer Murders last night. Someone stole a laptop. It was an inch and a half thick at least and they had to unplug two chunky plugs from the back; one was a D25 parallel to a printer, the other looked like a D9 serial. No sign of a power lead :-)
M.
Pounds are subdivided into ounces, not tenths and hundreths. Someone has obviously converted those measurements, probably with a four-function calculator, from the original kg. and mm., and not even bothered to do it properly. 0.45 of a pound is 7.2oz., and 0.66lb. is 10.56oz. A few tenths of a pound is a bigger few ounces, and 0.62lb. is 9.92oz.
Anyway, going through your examples in order, we get: 1100-1200g. while being only 18mm. thick, a few hundred grams heavier and about 2.5mm. thicker, 1.64kg. and a good couple of dozen mm. thick.
This post has been deleted by its author
This thing is like those cool-looking/cool-featured concept cars, featured at auto shows, but which never are put into mass production.
The #1 feature this laptop is missing: externally-swapable battery packs. It used to be that EVERY laptop had this feature. Now, NO, AFAIK, laptops have this feature.
I understand what you mean, but you have to put this in some kind of context. Many older laptops had replaceable battery packs because one would only provide around three hours of life when they were new, and having replacable packs allowed you to keep a spare with you to keep working on the go.
I recently did a test with 'my' newest laptop, a Thinkpad T470s (I have newer work provided laptops than anything I own) and I got over 6 hours out of the internal battery packs for a laptop that must be 8 years old now. This is mainly because the processor technology has moved on, as Intel finally worked out how to get proper power management working in their processors.
And opening this up (I wanted to put a larger SSD in), I could see that the two battery packs were relatively easy to access (unlike the T470, the T470s has internal battery packs) if I ever needed to change them. I just couldn't do it without opening the system up.
I'm not disputing that there will always be use cases where people need more time than the standard battery in a laptop can provide.
But I would guess that most laptops nowadays are built to meet the majority of use cases. So a laptop that is light, portable and with a battery life that lasts the best part of a working day probably meets most people's requirements. But not all of them, as there is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all device. The outliers should be regarded as edge cases, and catered for separately.
I have to say that when I used to work mobile more than I do now, I never found it convenient to carry a spare battery, and keep it charged. Batteries normally had to be in the laptop to be charged. Very few of them could be charged outside of the device (I know, I'm sure you will be able to find an exception). But I was always in a situation where it was better and easier to just carry a charger. But again, I was normally always close to power.
Ignoring replacing degraded batteries, which is a very infrequent operation, and just looking at the extended use requirement, I'm sure there are people who are off the grid, for whom long periods of time without being able to plug in do exist. But these would be considered mostly niche cases, and other solutions (like high power external batteries that you could carry and connect via USB C when needed) exist and are probably no more difficult than carrying a spare battery.
Your point about external USB-C battery packs is well taken -- provided the laptop in question ACCEPTS power via USB-C.
My current laptop, bought used, does not. With today's insane prices I do mot wish to buy a new laptop. My beloved, now-deceased, EeePC not only had externally-swappable battery packs, it conveniently ran on 12VDC. When an extended power failure struck my area, I was able to continue using my Eee via a gelled-electrolyte 12 volt hobbyist battery I had.
Old ThinkPads used to have that too - their UltraBay would let you put in a second hard drive, CD-ROM/DVD-ROM drive, a zip drive, a floppy, or a battery, with a socket on the side of the machine for an external UltraBay slot which could take any of the things bar the battery so you could use two at once.
I had a 600E when I was a kid with a DVD drive and a floppy and having the convenience was great.
Likewise the X270, which AFAIK is the last of the line to have that feature. External battery is available in two capacities too.
I have one dual booted between W10 & MX Linux. I rarely boot the W10 but on MX it goes for ages on the internal battery + large external battery combo. Unfortunately my usage isn't for continuous use so I can't quantify how long "ages" actually is, sorry.
As far as the previous comment about only being able to charge the external battery in the laptop goes, yes, correct, but when I had 'phones with removable batteries I was always able to pick up a little charging dock for them in which to charge the spare batteries. I always thought that it would have been an obvious accessory for an enterprising Chinese indy manufacturer to make for a few models of "professional" laptop like the thinkpads, but I never saw such a thing for sale.
But not every laptop supported hot swapping of battery packs.
However, given Lenovo seem to like USB power supply, it does leave you free to source a battery pack suited to your needs.
One of my bugbears with modern laptops is the amount of additional gizmo’s (eg. Multiport USB hubs) needed just to access “normal” business connectivity (eg. HMDI/Displayport, RJ45 LAN, SVGA etc.plus a couple of ports spare for a couple of thumb drives and pocket HDDs.
They should go back to the old keyboard of the X10, T42,T60 eras. These were decent keyboards. The attraction to the "chiclet" keyboards I have never found. My work laptop is a ThinkPad P16V - a Ryzen 9 PRO/NVIDIA A2000 workhorse - which works damned well, and can last up to 8 hours on properly managed battery, but the fly in the ointment is the keyboard. In it's stead I use a 30 year old 6312-TW, or a cherry brown when at my desk. Don't get me wrong, The P16Vs keyboard is better than many laptops, but none are in the same league as the old T42 and T60 I have at home.
This article doesn't mention Linux, and I see it only once in the comments section.
Precisely why I'm still on an older Mac.
If Lenovo wants to open up a big new market, they can prove these "just work" with a whole bunch of mainstream Linux flavors.
I'd really like a Linux laptop, but I have too much stuff to do at work to also fight with my own computer.
Why can't it be as simple as desktops have been for the past what, ten years?