Testing
"A Cloudflare engineer says he has implemented 94 percent of the Next.js API "
And tested it?
A Cloudflare engineer says he has implemented 94 percent of the Next.js API by directing Anthropic's Claude, spending about $1,100 on tokens. The purpose of the experimental project was not to show off AI coding, but to address an issue with Next.js, the popular React-based framework sponsored by Vercel. According to …
From the article - it seems it is well tested as the tests on Next.js allow.
"It's not even one week old, and it has not yet been battle-tested with any meaningful traffic at scale. If you're evaluating it for a production application, proceed with appropriate caution.
"That said, the test suite is extensive: over 1,700 Vitest tests and 380 Playwright E2E tests, including tests ported directly from the Next.js test suite and OpenNext's Cloudflare conformance suite. We’ve verified it against the Next.js App Router Playground. Coverage sits at 94% of the Next.js 16 API surface."
If an application has sufficient tests then at least it should behave as what it replaces as long as test coverage is high enough.
Another article about how someone sorta, nearly almost made something with AI whilst spending considerable money whilst holding it's hand...
Can we just stop with the propaganda for the hallucination grift as a service platform and just let this bubble die already, I want to buy some hardware...
So please be gentle for me asking a stupid question. Is Next.js copyright code? It sorta sounds like it is if people are looking for reasons to reimplement it, versus just improving it which is what you'd expect if it was open source.
So if it is copyright code, and it is Javascript so it is available in a form an AI could snarf up and use, how do you know that the AI didn't break copyright by copying a lot of stuff from Next.js itself?
I mean, given that the Windows code was leaked in the past so if you told an AI to "reimplement Windows" (OK realistically some subset of the API) how would you know it didn't use a lot of Microsoft's own code in doing so? Microsoft isn't going to sue just the AI for that. They'll also sue YOU if you release that code!