back to article Microsoft kills standalone SharePoint and OneDrive plans, because they’re not suite enough

Microsoft has slipped out news that it’s killing some standalone SharePoint and OneDrive plans. The software giant delivered the news in a note for its partners, which explains it is “evolving its cloud storage and collaboration offerings and is retiring the standalone SharePoint Online (SPO) plan 1 and plan 2 and OneDrive for …

  1. simonlb Silver badge
    Stop

    “evolving its cloud storage and collaboration offerings"

    That's a good euphemism for, 'further enshittifying our cloud offerings.'

    “reflects low customer demand for standalone offerings, increased instances of unintended or nonstandard usage, and higher operational costs associated with maintaining these plans.”

    'Low customer demand' is probably because these plans weren't pushed as aggressively as the suites so people missed them.

    'Unintended or nonstandard usage' will be people choosing these as it's just cheaper cloud storage, not because of the quality of the service.

    'Higher operational costs associated with maintaining these plans.' Nope, it's because MS have identified an area where customers product aren't getting price gouged yet, and that needs remedying.

    There's probably also not enough AI rammed into these areas either, so naturally this also needs addressing paying for so just sit back, shut up and enjoy the new offerings. We're doing you a favour mate.

    1. Bebu sa Ware Silver badge
      Windows

      'further enshittifying our cloud offerings.'

      It's not raining turds already ?

  2. segfault188
    Devil

    because they’re not suite enough

    No point in sugar-coating the news.

  3. blu3b3rry Silver badge
    Devil

    Presumably Microslop are cancelling these as it was too difficult to think of a way to ram ClippyPilot into the offering.

  4. Michael Hoffmann Silver badge
    Thumb Down

    Great. And I also received yet another email on a price hike for MS 365 (Small) Business.

    Glad I'm already working on getting rid of it, but thought "hey, 1TB is fine, maybe I'll keep only that".

    F*ck you, MS!

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      My biggest gripe with all of the plans, is that there is no simple way of archiving mailboxes from accounts that are no longer required: either you set up something that downloads the mailbox file and you managed storage youself or you keep the mailbox active, or you pony up for a plan with a more sophisticated data retention system.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Archive mail

        > My biggest gripe with all of the plans, is that there is no simple way of archiving mailboxes from accounts that are no longer required:

        Convert them to a shared mailbox and remove the licences. That way you can allocate access for people to manage them as required.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Archive mail

          That works technically, but the ICO takes a dim view of doing this sort of thing with mailboxes of former staff - we recently asked them for their view on this and surprisingly got some pretty clear advice (in the past I've usually founf them quite vague). Basically, they don't advise keeping it for more than a month unless there is a very strong reason.

  5. Kane
    Windows

    ...adds tools including data loss prevention,...

    "That's a nice bit of data you got there. Would be a shame if anything were to happen to it.

    Know what I mean, guv?"

  6. JimmyPage Silver badge
    Linux

    Drug pushers

    really.

    Good luck if you have decided to commit to MS - because there's no going back now.

  7. xyz Silver badge

    Wish the title read...

    Microsoft kills SharePoint and OneDrive, because they’re shit.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Wish the title read...

      What is better ?

      1. Kevin Johnston Silver badge

        Re: Wish the title read...

        I suspect this is like a lot of storage offerings even down to options as prosaic as those self-store units. It starts with good intentions but ends up as the place which stuff goes to avoid the delete function since 'it may be needed one day'.

        This type of online storage model is used based on price and simplicity and was probably selected on the basis they already had other MS stuff so why not. There is of course an XKCD https://xkcd.com/1360/ which shows exactly what the stuff stored looks like but the reason it got stored is the same reason it will never be checked. Having recently gone through the process of checking all my digital photos (those that I could find at least) I was horrified to see that in some cases I had 8 copies of the same photo in different locations/drives. De-duping brought the total storage down from almost 100GB to just 16GB. I am sure if I continued that to remove junk images it would be half that figure.

        Out of sight storage just encourages junk collecting and everyone is guilty but in this day and age nobody seems to have time to clean it up

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Wish the title read...

          "I suspect this is like a lot of storage offerings even down to options as prosaic as those self-store units. It starts with good intentions but ends up as the place which stuff goes to avoid the delete function since 'it may be needed one day'."

          Having tried on many occasions to get people to sort out messy files, the reasons / excuses are usually either that it might be needed one day, that they don't have time, or that the files were created by someone who did the job previously and are therefore nothing to do with them (despite it being their area of work). Unless you can get a three-line whip enforced by the management, it's basically a lost cause where many people are concerned.

          1. David Hicklin Silver badge

            Re: Wish the title read...

            > Having tried on many occasions to get people to sort out messy files, the reasons / excuses are usually either that it might be needed one day, that they don't have time

            We had that and on of my final tasks was to go through the files tree and nuke anything that was obsolete - at the end there was not much left. I mean who needs files from 2003 relating to a product long gone and would not even run on systems as far back as windows 7....

      2. Charlie Clark Silver badge

        Re: Wish the title read...

        Is that a trick question? Why would you want anything like SharePoint?

        As for OneDrive – pretty much all the alternatives are better.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The cost of Copilot

    RAM is hit worst (so far) but all storage prices are rising: the more one side of Microsoft shove the totally unwanted "free" Copilot on us, the more the other side is told to raise our costs to compensate.

  9. ComicalEngineer Silver badge

    I have this special backup system. It consists of some spinning rust in small boxs (OK, a couple of them are SSDs).

    These drives, including some older 5 inch drives, store my last 25 years worth of work and personal files.

    I find that the smaller ones can easily be transported in my pocket and plugged in as and when I need them.

    I have never had a requirement to store my stuff in the cloud and use e.g. dropbox if I need to transfer large files.

    And yes, there are at least 2 backups for all the important stuff.

    1. jockmcthingiemibobb

      For non technical end users with BYOD devices in multiple locations. Like it or loathe it, OneDrive just "works".

  10. Roland6 Silver badge

    Xbox game pass

    Can’t belong before this standalone subscription is also folded in to 365 (as a £ add-on).

  11. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    "unlimited cloud storage"

    Just like unlimited data plans etc. Either it gets canned once it's too expensive of there's a small print definition of "unlimited" somewhere in paperwork referred to somewhere in the paperwork.

  12. An_Old_Dog Silver badge

    Autocratic Microsoft Attitude

    Microsoft has an autocratic attitude that it can dictate how people use the MS services they paid for.

    If Microsoft cannot imagine it, it is labelled "unintended, non-standard" (and implied, "deviant").

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    How long

    How long until they just remove the E3 tier forcing everyone onto E5 (with coprolite of course)?

    Of course they'll introduce an E7 tier at that point above E5 so they have something to push everyone up to when they need a revenue boost.

    I do wonder if these execs at MS and Broadcom etc have got side bets with each other about who can jack their prices highest without customers rebelling in volume?

    It's just a p1ss take now. I'm sure the marketing droids will be out to tell us that we demanded this and we're getting the best value ever and we've never been happier etc etc.

  14. captain veg Silver badge

    Why?

    Not so long ago I bought a 1TB microsd card for not a lot of money.

    Why would I want this cloud thing?

    -A.

  15. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Once Upon a Time

    You bought something and it was yours.

    If it didn't work as advertised you could go to some consumer protection organisation.

    Try telling a youngster that. They won't believe you.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon