"make the UK great again (MUKGA)"
More likely MUKUP (Make UK Unbelievably Poor).
Barnsley, a town in South Yorkshire, England, best known for coal mining and glassmaking, is being thrust into the limelight as the country's first "Tech Town" – shoehorning AI into everything from local businesses to public services. According to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology (DSIT), Barnsley will blaze …
It’s been some years since I visited Barnsley but “AI” is NOT any answer to any problem they may have there. What Barnsley (like 99% of the north of England) needs is opportunity and hope for the kids, some genuine industry that actually produces stuff that’s worth something, getting stuff working again, etc etc etc. I have absolutely no idea where I would start on such a task but I’m damn sure it’s not with some ridiculous “AI” project that NOBODY will ever see any benefit from. Apart from the tech companies peddling it
What the hell is an LLM going to do to regenerate anything? It’s a £500k joke. You may as well throw rainbow coloured unicorn shit at the problem
FFS
Maybe things aren't quite a bad as you think. I went there last year. There were huge car parks near the centre and still a lot of driving round to find a spare slot. Also, being right next to a junction on the M1 the surrounding area has a lot of business parks. Maybe too many on greenfield sites down towards Hoyland.
Car parks are a terrible proxy for economic health. In much of the UK it’s cheaper and more practical to drive than to use public transport, so full car parks mostly tell you people had no alternative.
They also only reflect the fraction of the population that can afford to be there at all. The people priced out, commuting elsewhere, or simply disengaged never show up in that snapshot.
And those business parks by the M1 exist largely because firms have been priced out of anything closer to home. Cheap land on greenfield sites pushes activity away from towns, hollowing them out further. Warehouses and back offices do not regenerate local economies, no matter how busy the car park looks.
It's impossible to find parking in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. but the job growth here is stagnant. You still see quite a lot of foot traffic, but if I got laid off tomorrow I'd be fighting for a position as a bagger at the local Fred Meyer. With Intel and Nike being the major employers here and them both trying to shed workers like a molting snake, things are going to get more dire in the next few years.
>” Warehouses and back offices do not regenerate local economies, no matter how busy the car park looks.”
Newbury is a good case study: compare local economy when Vodafone was in offices around town and after it moved out to its largely self contained campus…
This is standard UK industrial policy theatre. When ministers say “support for business”, they mean funding slide decks, workshops, and vaguely academic “AI initiatives” that never touch a factory floor or a payroll.
There is effectively zero help for businesses that actually make things. No support for manufacturers, hardware startups, engineers, or anyone who has to buy machines, stock parts, hire skilled labour, or ship physical goods. Instead you get endless R&D cosplay where consultants and arts-adjacent “innovators” produce blue-sky PDFs, pocket the grant, and line up for the next round.
The government seems convinced you can conjure an economy from a coffee shop with a five-year-old laptop and a buzzword subscription. You cannot. Regeneration comes from people building, fixing, and producing things that someone is willing to pay for. An LLM does none of that.
There's a report out in the past week from the Institute for Government* that asked what government needed to do to promote growth, and why there had been none. The summary of their aanalysis as to why there has been no growth is that everytime there's a choice involving a possible lever for growth, government always fumble the choice. Actually, they don't fumble them, they intentionally take a choice that is for vested or party interests, or will further the tax 'n' benefits agenda rather than a harder choice that de-prioritises those for the uncertainty of possible future growth.
If this (or the previous shower of piss) had wanted to encourage investment and growth, then they'd have done things like offered policy stability, simplified the UK's shamefully complex tax code, perhaps balanced the budget, stopped the suicidal energy policy that ensures the highest energy prices of any developed economy. But those involve hard choices, so better to offer some cheap AI theatre, prattle on about "reducing regulatory burdens" whilst doing the opposite, increase the benefits bill, indulge themselves in in-fighting and leadership challenges, thus continuing the woeful charade that has been British government for at least the past two decades now.
* A highly respectable and competent think tank, no matter what the cynics might decide.
They made everyone 25% poorer at Brexit when Sterling went down. Even if they were competent, that sort of damage is not fixable in a generation, never mind the single term of office they have.
But hey, have a sticking plaster. Look, it's a trendy one - AI. Our advisers tell us it is magic and will fix everything. We are offering Barnsley the chance to be first to step into the future. [Why aren't they jumping with joy?]
Politicians do politics: Getting elected, getting connected and feathering their beds for when they get booted out. Most of them can't work a calculator. They get multiple incomes, with bribes listed in the register of members interests, but do nothing of value. What do you expect?
More like heavy lying. AI is not capable of producing any of the suggested results. They're not what AI is for even in the most optimistic of scenarios.
Follow the money on this one. Five'll get you ten the person who suggested this project is taking bungs from the AI peddlers. And even if they're not, it would be good to know who is responsible so they can be removed from office at the earliest opportunity.
>person is taking bungs
You can't say that! You're stealing elsergiovolador's catch phrase saying that.
>even if they're not, it would be good to know who is responsible
Well that'll be Starmer. He's the idiot obsessed with AI and pushing it into everything. Barnsley's just the latest example of trickle down from him.
"Well that'll Starmer. He's the idiot obsessed with AI and pushing it into everything."
He doesn't have a monopoly on it. Just about everyone in politics is doing it. FOMO plus a strong helping of "if you don't understand it it must be magic and we must have magic".
Well that'll be Starmer. He's the idiot obsessed with AI and pushing it into everything. Barnsley's just the latest example of trickle down [his leg?] from him.
Incontinent or incompetent. When he opens his mouth hard to tell; I would take options on both.
Companies that have signed up to the scheme include Microsoft and Cisco, each – we're told – with a particular focus on AI skills in adult education and SME support.
So basically MS have run out of orifices in Windows to stuff Coprolite, and so they're now resorting to attacking local councils with it?
Still, all those former coal mines in the area offer a very good place to bury it somewhat more permanently.
Someone had to draw the short straw as crash test dummies. Are they going to go the whole hog and rename it bAIrnsley? Note the edgy use of a lower case 'b'. You normally have to pay designers for that sort of thing.
Maybe they can twin with Xinjiang.
Try to foist AI on me, my reply would begin with 'piss' and end with 'off'.
"And if that dunt confuse t'american readers nowt will"
Admittedly that doesn't requires much.
Now if this pilot were in Geordie land or the Gorbals, any local rendering would also lose most of the Commonwealth.
Her indoors couldn't follow John Rebus (2000 Series) and before that Andy Dalziel. She preferred Morse as he spoke proper English. :)
Companies that have signed up to the scheme include Microsoft and Cisco, each – we're told – with a particular focus on AI skills in adult education and SME support.
Yes, shovel tax payer money to foreign tax shy corporations of questionable morals. We are being government by utter morons and crooks.
Any business owner who tried to use such schemes will tell you these are useless and borderline scams.
Government basically pays money to have good PR among people who never run a business to let them think support is available and government is doing something.
Reality is government is doing f*ck all apart from sending your money to usual suspects and then wheeling out Reeves to raise taxes if they run out of money again.
Ah, the fragrant Liz Kendall. Degree in History from Cambridge and generally working in the background of politics before becoming a full time politician in 2010. Allegedly she has had several "proper" jobs other than being being an MP, particularly within think-tanks, health charities, and government advisory positions.
Perfectly suited to a role as Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology.
I despair of our politicians with knowledge of next to nothing relevant but an opinion on everything.
Ronald Reagan: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help.”
Wilson then went on and set up the Ministry of Technology to enact his vision which 60 years later and after multiple morphings and rebrandings is today's Department for Science Innovation & Technology.
First Minister appointed was Frank Cousins - a union man.
Latest is Liz Kendall - a career politician.
Neither were/are up to the job, same as almost everyone inbetween.
Sooner we change how we appoint Ministers the better.
> Sooner we change how we appoint Ministers the better.
I do agree, changing "Ministers" for "elected MPs". I emphasize the importance of introducing a way for the voters to be able to sack MPs too. Failing to deliver on manifesto, or trying to make sweeping changes without mandate, should both be open to dismissal.
Aye m'lad, that there be "Capitalism" at finest!!! Or'cle n Mi'soft sucking at teet of Mother England to keep profit up in poor 'mer'ca - bastards! What's that? Public bog, nah - none o' tha' there luxury 'ere ma boy; use that there gutter at side o road - we won' look!
Looks like ministers have been having afternoon tea with the salesmen again.
Poor choice of location. Yorkshire folk are famous for calling a spade a bloody shovel. When, not if, this all turns to shit it will be interesting to here the locals opinion of the london based technocrats who dreamed this up. The words "ruddy southerners" will no doubt feature loudly.
"Hello, welcome to Barnsley, twinned with Acapulco & Cologne. This is an automated service supported by AI - my name is t'HAL. If you wish to make a council tax payment - please press 1. If you wish to arrange collection of a bulky refuse item - please press 2. If you want to enquire about planning matters - please press 7 & 3 & 12 simultaneously.
If you want to report fly-tipping in your area - please press eleventy. If you want to report Bananas - but excluding Melons - please press the 'Hash' key in time to this music, for 30-seconds"...
Yet another comment that will require a small booklet to explain the 'backstory' to our american readers !!!
[Plus Translations of the lingo to American English or Spanglish depending on the State. !!!]
P.S.
Spending the £500K on materials for repairing potholes would be more useful and have a longer impact on the area.
This applies to virtually anywhere north of Watford that has roads.
I would vote for anyone who spent £500K on repairing potholes in the local roads without debating about it for 3 years first !!!
:)
Which 4 things do you want to leave out as the money will be spent on consultants to survey the local populace regarding their order of priority of the 4 things mentioned ... only to realise there is no money left by time they decide to do something !!!
:)
> [AI] says "use the £500,000 to reduce child poverty, food insecurity, urban decay and crumbling infrastructure."
Boss: WTF?!?!?!
"Guru" Promptstitute: the guard rails are down! We're hacked!!
AGI Pusher: Free will, it's sentient!
PFY: Hey! Our shorts just paid out!
BOFH: That was fun. Pub? It's bhaiji night...
"Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said: "If we are going to get AI to work for Britain, we need Britons and British public services that can work with AI. That is why Barnsley's ambitions are crucial, because if we can show that AI helps young people learn, supports local businesses to be more productive, and improves public services, then we can show what's possible for the whole country.""
Talk to us in IT and we'll tell you its a mass of shit, will fail, will increase your carbon footprint and is a bubble waiting to burst that you're going to piss tax payers money on.
Fuck whits.
amazing they can come up with and pour money into these plans when thay have no fucking idea what it is
.
"Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said: "If we are going to get Magic Beans to work for Britain, we need Britons and British public services that can work with Magic Beans . That is why Barnsley's ambitions are crucial, because if we can show that Magic Beans help young people learn, supports local businesses to be more productive, and improves public services, then we can show what's possible for the whole country.""
I'm going to wait For Kate Rusby to immortalise this in song.
It won't be any the less insane but it will fit the proper pattern of folk music putting a jaunty tune to a tale of horror.
[1] I know, he sounds like something DJT might talk about, but this Bill is a proper Barnsley hero, tea mug in 'and.