Re: Fair Use Doctrine
>In the US, it is 100% legal for an owner of an unencrypted disk to,
>1. make an exact digital back up of that disc, in both physical and digital formats
It is still 100% illegal in the USA to make any backup of an unencrypted music CD, as there is no exception granted in US copyright law that gives permission to do so; https://www.copyright.gov/title17/title17.pdf although you are extremely unlikely to be prosecuted for doing so and a "fair use" defense is likely to be successful.
The only thing that you are allowed to backup are computer programs; https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-digital.html; "There is no other provision in the Copyright Act that specifically authorizes the making of backup copies of works other than computer programs even if those works are distributed as digital copies."
>But disregard the fact it is running on Windows, proprietary software and known spyware.
I don't need to point out the obvious every single time I point out that you shouldn't run additional proprietary software - it would also be possible to make the mistake of running foobar2000 in WINE.
>Furthermore, you infer you vetted every bit of software on your machine by accurately vetting *reproducible* source code.
If it's not free software (and therefore has complete corresponding source code available), I won't install it on my machines.
The binary output from free software source code being compiled not being exactly reproducible doesn't make such software proprietary - after all, you'll get a different binary hash if you use a different version of GCC and some binaries have the current date inserted.
>You infer you have examined the proprietary software in the silicon chips of every device's firmware in your box.
I didn't install it and I have examined all of such software in my computers.
On my ThinkPads, I have replaced the BIOS which had malicious features with GNUboot.
My goal is to replace every remaining piece of software, but upon examining most, there is not cause for much concern, as there can't be a remote backdoor in such that allows the vendor to remotely change it and such software doesn't have DMA either.
>That's how logic works, so your stated position would result in no one ever using a computer again.
Maybe that would be fine - but it is perfectly feasible and achievable for a computer to work without any proprietary software - and there are already a limited amount of microprocessors do exist that run all free software (for example Arduino's prior to the acquisition by Qualcomm).
>foobar2000 is among the apps I completely trust. I also trust all apps from nirsoft. Same with mp3tag
It's insanity to trust software that can go and connect to the internet, that you're not allowed to see the source code of, unless you have at least thoroughly inspected the object code.
Inspecting object code thoroughly is feasible for a small boring program that takes touchpad inputs, but it is not really possible for a several MiB binary.
>same with Debian
It is a mistake to trust Debian, considering how they added a malicious feature to the installer than automatically installs proprietary software without even asking the user.