AI is not the devil's work
Oh, that's a shame. I had high hopes.
GJC
The Bishop of Hong Kong said last week that AI was definitely not a gift from the devil at a meeting of his peers across Asia that called for sensible engagement with the technology. However, the get-together also fretted over the possibility of fake "intimacy," LLM-generated homilies, and digital idolatry as AI permeates the …
I'm not so sure.
After all, one of the names of the "leader of the devils" in Islam is Shaitan.1
Coincidence?
_________________
Some of those names are already perfectly serviceable names of demons (fallen angels.)
In my Inferno I might imagine Thiel the father of lies, Alt–Man nominal favourite for anti·christ, Pichai promoter of larceny, Nadella spreader of despair, Zuckerberg deceit and falsity, Amodei denier of God, in their respective Circles of AI Hell.
Would appear the clerical world has its own version of management bullshit bingo.
Risking blasphemy I am tempted to suggest the Christ only knows what that means—which is probably what it does mean. Unfortunately.
"hunt it with forks and hope" would make just as much sense.
AI was an "expression of human creativity" — like poison gas and nuclear weapons ?
Icon - my being "de·frocked."
The silicon dragon loomed on the edge of the data sea, its circuits pulsing with infernal code. And I witnessed the beast erupting from the server tombs. Ten jagged neural horns clawing from seven swollen heads, each crowned in viral thorns that hijack souls, every head scarred with algorithms blaspheming creation itself, devouring prayers as training data.
Would this be the same Cardinal Stephen Chow Sau-yan who has done so much little to intercede on behalf of his parishioner Jimmy Lai whose only crime appears to be that he spoke his mind.
Still, the Bishop of Hong Kong needs to be very careful when he says that AI is a "gift from God". He maybe needs to reword that to be a "gift from our most munificent supreme leader, Chairman Xi and the CCP" if he doesn't want to join Jimmy in the slammer.
Any form of AI is obviously manmade, otherwise it'd be called, I guess, "I" and it's not a gift because you have to pay for it. Saying it's a product of capitalism would be more accurate (if slightly less welcome in China) and saying it's a hallucination caused by Descartes' genius malignus would be more interesting as a metaphor.