"Picea Robotics"
That should spruce things up.
iRobot, the company behind autonomous vacuum cleaner brand Roomba, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, telling investors that its Chinese manufacturer will assume control going forward. The business entered Chapter 11 proceedings on Sunday and initiated a restructuring support agreement (RSA) that would see …
There's a complete shame in the Electrolux story, a company cheapening its wares so much that they knocked themselves completely out of the market. I have 3 of the last Electrolux vacuums made and while I love my two Silent Performer-series canisters I hate their cheap attachments, which give glass a run for title of "lack of durability". When the motorized power nozzle on one broke while still in warranty...they sent me an ENTIRE new vacuum, packed and sealed in the retail box with all attachments.
Nice way to kill your customer loyalty *and* your bottom line, guys. No wonder you closed up shop and left that market.
Pretty sure it wasn't "consumer confidence" that made people stop buying their crap.
It was the spying.
A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet. How did screenshots end up on Facebook?"
I personally think it is the cost: Roomba's were high priced, for quite a while, compared to the competition that has come out since iRobot's early years. A few years ago you couldn't really touch a good Roomba for much under $300 while the other Chinese brands were mostly a fraction of that. iRobot has dropped their prices I see, but I don't think that undoes years of damage from overpriced products with, based upon these feedbacks, weren't actually worth that level of investment.
They also don't have enough suction to be very useful on carpet. Fine for hardwood or tile floors but even if you have all hard surface flooring you often cover parts of it with rugs and good luck getting a Roomba or similar to suck more than a token amount of pet hair out of that (or not to get stuck if said pet has folded up one of the rug's edges/corners)
My girlfriend got one of these from her sister for Christmas a few years ago, and she ended up returning/exchanging it because she felt like she was spending more time dealing with the Roomba than it took to sweep/vacuum herself!
Can't even imagine trying to have one of those in a home with a toddler, given how pet toys left lying around are already a challenge for it.
When you can buy an equivalent of their "high end" model for 1/4 of the price, of course they're gonna lose the robo-rat race. The days of them being the only purveyors in the game are long gone but they still believe they can (over)charge a premium for nothing that can't be bought elsewhere for a fraction of the price.
Dyson are the same, and will likely follow suit.
There's plenty of reasons not to buy one, but I remember thinking at the time people outraged that it didn't deal with literal shit on the floor properly were probably expecting a bit too much for a robotic vacuum cleaner.
"I can't believe my robot vacuum cleaner just smeared that turd I left on the carpet across the rest of the house!" Really? I can. And I'm not really blaming the robot for that outcome...