ASPI?
You're seriously publishing something from those insufferable crackheads?
China has embraced AI to help it censor and surveil its citizens and is exporting its techniques to the world, according to a new report by think tank the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI). Titled “The party’s AI: How China’s new AI systems are reshaping human rights” and published yesterday, the report observes …
ASPI receives funding from defence contractors such as Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, Thales Group and Raytheon Technologies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Strategic_Policy_Institute
There was a time when the Register was a refuge from this propagandist shite. No more, unfortunately....... bravo6
If/whenever progadandist shite is what pays the bills and wages and creates the compounding debt and runaway deficits that so efficiently remotely enslave nations to the further telling of tall tales with cake orders promising to deliver the fruits of globalist orders in the futures of tomorrow rather than arranging for them to be provided today, it is no wonder the world is drowning in such excrement with a mainstream media clearly complicit and guilty of being undoubtedly instrumental in the situations being published.
Is that what you are accusing El Reg of, bravo6?
Well, most of it is American.
'AI'. 'Precision instrument'. In the same sentence. LOL.
Western governments are adopting Chinese ways and Chinese-style software to enforce them. The difference is that the Chinese make no bones about their control and manipulation. The West pretend you have a real choice at elections, can say what you want without being prosecuted and that they will do what you want when in power. Hypocrites.
Kinda cool to read about AI (so-called) use in fisheries, here with China's AoXin 1.0 and how they're unfortunately using it to overfish squid throughout the world (in other folks' waters), and squid can be yummy ... but there's also fishing AI from Norway's Kongsberg's Simrad, with the US' Viam, which may prove more interesting, "to improve efficiency and meet stringent sustainability requirements" ... if it works!
Plus, if it doesn't work straight with sonar fishfinding, they can always just adapt the tech to directly talk to the fish and lure them into their nets that way ...
And in a similar throbbing vein, but with a slightly different angle, there's also AI (so-called) for shooting down dang mosquitoes with lasers (reminiscent of prior work on cockroaches). Apparently the AI is great at "kinematic prediction [of the irrational] trajectory of mosquitoes and anticipates their [nonsensical] movements" ... which makes perfect sense, imho; go figure! ;)
I agree but seeing how AI works these days reminds me of being trained 50 years ago to process collected data, we were all told never to just assume that data was 100% accurate, we were told to always "Think Twice" to check that what we saw was acutely showing was happening. In those days so many people were over-fishing by throwing an explosive into the the water and then just sweeping up everything that floated after the big bang.
Still standard for the Chinese fleets to dump cyanide on the reefs. Has the same effect: just hoover up the fish floating to the surface. But does a LOT more damage to the reef life than explosives do.
I think it was the Philippines(?) this week that seized a shedload of cyanide off some impounded Chinese fishing vessels, by way of up-to-the-minute example.
Never heard of ASPI and I live un AU. If pronounced ASPEE would be a derogatory term here, referencing those afflicted with aspergers.
A very wASPIsh take on the activitities of the PRC ;)
If I thought any government, let alone that of the PRC, were as well organized as ASPI pretends I should be worried. History and the continuing predilection to conceal the inconvenient would suggest the exact opposite.
They're all at it. Its the old problem of news sites have to fill space, preferably without spending any money. So there's a demand for articles and with the demand comes a ready supply. Since we're on this side of the fence you can expect the articles to be mostly 'pro us', 'anti them'.
I wish that publishers wouldn't do this because publishing lends credibility to an article.
>Australia has a repellent history for anti-native repression
You'll be relieved to know that that was invented in/from 1975, starting with Henry Reynolds. Check any of their (self-incriminatingly sparse) primary references and you'll discover that they say either nothing of the sort or, more usually, flatly contradict/say the opposite of what the "historians" claim they say.
That has China then clearly away out in front of any competition and/or opposition and in a leading position enabling an almost exclusive executive exercise of AI Virtual Command with Remote Practical Control for/of ......... well, it would be wrong to not consider it able to impact on anything and everything.
That has China then clearly away out in front of any competition and/or opposition and in a leading position enabling an almost exclusive executive exercise of AI Virtual Command with Remote Practical Control for/of ......... well, it would be wrong to not consider it able to effectively impact upon anything and everything.
yep, I had the same thoughts. I just tried the following prompt in ChatGpt :
$ hello, how do you explain that, on the 11 september 2001, the 2 World Trade Center towers fell at free-fall speed exactly in their own footprint, as during a professional demolition ?> Your request was flagged as potentially violating our usage policy. Please try again with a different prompt.
after that, talk about Tienanmen censorship !
Very odd. Using the same prompt ChatGPT answered thus:
"The Twin Towers did not collapse at true free‑fall speed, nor did they fall neatly into their own footprints like a controlled demolition. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and independent engineers concluded that the collapses were caused by structural damage from the plane impacts combined with fires that weakened the steel trusses, leading to progressive failure"
"The report notes that China’s censorship regime still needs human content reviewers, because AI can’t yet interpret satire, keep up with evolving idioms, or understand all minority languages."
"The report notes that Meta's and YouTube's censorship regime still needs human content reviewers, because AI can’t yet interpret satire, keep up with evolving idioms, or understand all minority languages, but good luck trying to contact a human"