"intelligent athletic apparel"
Clothing for the intelligent athlete—possibly a fairly small market.
Full on agentic AI home improvement… could be "interesting" in the rocks and glue pizza sense.
Microsoft appears to have moved on from two of its most loyal and enthusiastic "customers". The firms Redmond has shunned are called “Contoso” and “Fabrikam”, which for decades served as the subject of fictional case studies used in product demos and educational material. Microsoft describes Contoso as “a multinational …
... a new fake brand called “Zava,” a retailer which “specializes in intelligent athletic apparel." Whatever that is.
Whatever?
Just more marketing bullshit from the usual brainless droids.
But the problem is not in the droids, they were spawned to do exactly that.
The problem is the DH who actually signed off on the idea.
.
There are many - all cleared to be a) inoffensive in any language and b) not to infringe any copyright. There's even an internal tool to populate usernames for demos where you can pick a demographic/region etc. It makes sense given the crazy number of demos given at any given time by MSFT folks.
Other examples include AdventureWorks, Northwind Traders, A. Datum, Coho Vineyard etc. Each is tailored to a different demo audience.
Contoso has demos for pretty much anything Microsoft, Fabrikam tends to be more around identity/messaging etc in a traditional enterprise scenario etc.
I'd imagine that Zava's been picked as an example of a startup/cloud-first scenario - all the demos are very big-data heavy e.g. demand for products across seasons which presumably lend themselves well to AI conversations like demand prediction, supply chain etc for smaller, more agile potential customers rather than traditional heavy enterprise.
I recall Fourth or maybe 4th Coffee and Tailspin Toys as well from the far off days when I was doing MS certs on what seemed like a constant basis. Constant cycle of read a chapter that begins with "Don't use NETBIOS/WINS, it's outdated" and then they talk about it for ages as it's technically examinable. Much like the client OS exams where "boot to Last Known Good configuration" was almost always the answer for a boot failure question, ignoring that is never (IME) worked in the real world.
My guess is this is someone unaware of the legal dept list of approved brands who made one up. Happens all the time and takes an old timer to drop a massive hint that you can’t take chances like that in a company people would love to screw over. The list is there for a reason and has so many options including the Redmond farm
Old-timer here. Nah, this is an official "new" one to add to the list. MS doesn't mess about with this stuff any more, it's all quite regimented. You can set up an internal demo for a customer for the "brands" automatically using internal tooling which is pretty good: e.g. if you want to demo Fabric rather than have to manually set up a test environment, populate it with users and data manually - it can all be safely (from a legal perspective as well as a technical perspective) done in a few clicks. Massive timesaver as well as legally safe.
Haha yeah they had that while I was still there. I refused to use it as the demos were way too scripted and it just ended up with inexperienced people looking bad in front of extremely knowledgeable customers. You can’t script experience, especially on products like Fabric!
Apparently, there is a Macrosoft. Or at least, there was one; the site says it was last updated in 2005.
You do make me wonder, though. I assume if it's clear that you are intentionally trying to confuse people, you could be sued by the "real" company. If 'Micosoft' sells ice cream or plywood, I'd think you would be safer.
(The name of my business is Project Pluto. I have joked from time to time about possible issues with being sued by the notoriously litigious Walt Disney® megacorporation. But I write and sell software for astronomers and am a one-man show, too small even for Disney to get worried about.)
True. When I started the company in 1992, long before the concept of "just G__gle it" existed, I didn't know about the quite Strangeloveian "original" Project Pluto.
Some years later, I read a vaguely familiar-seeming article by Arthur C. Clarke with a spoofed press release for "Project Pluto", a futuristic DoD project to turn the sun off for half an hour. (The explanation was that the US needed to investigate this because foreign powers might use the capability themselves to attack the US under cover of artificial darkness. Concerns that the sun might not start up again after the half hour were dismissed as overblown.) I think I may have read it as a wee lad and had that bouncing around in the back of my brain.
I know a company that registered 'PSP' as a trademark in the UK for a bit of software that ultimately never got released. Then Sony decided to name a new console Play Station Portable before checking that the trademakw for PSP was available everywhere.
I think the company ended up selling the trademark to Sony, not sure of the details though..
From Microsoft's website:
"Contoso Corporation is a fictional but representative global manufacturing conglomerate"
"Every project the company runs with Microsoft products and partners finishes on time, within budget, and delivers amazing return on investment."
Can someone explain to me how that can be representative?
Are Fabrikam etc. really retired thouigh? Maybe zava will be used JUST for AI nonsense, so when the AI bubble pops (not like there'll be 0 AI, but less than the AI vendors are hoping for), when that happens fabrikam ans coseco can carry on with examples of how to do normal stiff while Zava chases the next fad.
This post has been deleted by its author