"Experience is a dear teacher but there are those who will learn by no other"
Dorset Council ditching customized SAP for £14M Oracle overhaul
Southwest England's Dorset Council is preparing to swap its legacy SAP ERP for an Oracle-built replacement in a project set to cost £14.2 million over three years. According to an official notice published last week, the £417.2 million-budget unitary authority has signed a £7 million contract with Oracle "for the purchase of …
COMMENTS
-
-
Monday 1st December 2025 11:21 GMT HandleBaz
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
You'd think this was something that could just be figured out.
Alas, recent experience with Norway's hospital management system "Helseplatformen" shows that it is in fact not that easy.
There's always some gods-be-damned "wouldn't it be nice if" ruining the entire thing.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 11:50 GMT wolfetone
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
Yeah but no one is strong enough to lead and tell all of these authorities - you all do the same shit, so account the same way.
So say Norwich Council they need to be able to account for all the tractors they have. Birmingham would need to account for all the Bin Men they don't want to pay.
You can see how this would become problematic if you don't have someone there with a cricket bat to smash home the fact that THEY ALL DO THE SAME FUCKING THING.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 12:05 GMT alain williams
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
At the risk of sounding like a broken record the councils should get together, write one system and share with other councils around the country. I can see the need for small variations (eg town vs rural) but as wolftone says THEY ALL DO THE SAME FUCKING THING.
If council leaders do not want to do this then we need to start a hunt for brown envelopes, there cannot be any other sensible reason.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 14:55 GMT Like a badger
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
If council leaders do not want to do this then we need to start a hunt for brown envelopes, there cannot be any other sensible reason.
Oh but there is. The Universal Power, sometimes referred to as dark matter, the thing that holds the cosmos together, the power that drives gravity, forms the fabric of reality, is in infinite supply and infinite demand, and cannot be destroyed: stupidity. Actually, having played it for laughs, I'll suggest a few better reasons why local authorities don't do this is:
(a) national government won't force them as to do so would be deemed a breach of local democracy (and what do central government know about IT systems?)
(b) Local Government Association could be a starting place but seem intent on avoiding the IT platform issue
(c) There's no credible benchmark data for current systems costs and performance across councils
(d) absent a spec there's a problem even estimating a build and support budget
(e) Most councils are struggling to do what they have to do with the funding they're allowed, and..
(f) few councils have the spare moolah to throw at a speculative project to build a platform that most are many years from needing
-
-
-
Monday 1st December 2025 13:49 GMT Tim Kemp
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
No, They're not. There's a massive difference between a council the size and scope of Birmingham to that for example of Hull. Some councils have housing, some don't. Some have pensions to administer, others outsource that. Adult Social care and other central grant funded obligations have very odd accounting processess, and the number of transactions is large and complex.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 15:02 GMT Like a badger
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
And there's a shed-load of commonality: Council tax collection incl overdue and bad debt, same again for business rates, payroll, council finances and reporting, accounts payable/receivable, procurement, planning and licencing, housing benefit payment etc etc.
Any credible council ERP would be modular, if they don't need a module they don't commission it.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 15:50 GMT nijam
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
> Some councils have housing, some don't.
Surely you mean "Some councils have one or more items on their haousing roster, some have zero." Any numerate person can cope with the use of zero to mean none. So, do councils have established rules against employing numrate staff?
-
Monday 1st December 2025 17:29 GMT Doctor Syntax
Re: Are not council business requirements largely the same across the UK?
Where one council doesn't have housing to administer that may simply be at that tier, some other tier may have housing obligations covering that area.
"Adult Social care and other central grant funded obligations have very odd accounting processess, and the number of transactions is large and complex."
One would hope that these processes are followed uniformly everywhere otherwise one might start hearing about post-code lotteries. You have made the best possible case for a standard module to be not just available but used by every council at whatever tier that has that responsibility.
Module is the operative word in this. Given a series of modules to cover the various functions a council could use a mix of them appropriate to its responsibilities.
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 1st December 2025 16:20 GMT Phil O'Sophical
Re: What the fuck are UK local authorities doing
The people who get themselves elected to councils don't do so because they want to help their local communitty. They do so because they want to show off how clever they are, and how much better they are than anyone else who might have been elected. Ergo, they can't possibly do things the same way as any other council, because then they wouldn't be making a unique difference.
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 1st December 2025 13:19 GMT Like a badger
Re: £14M Oracle overhaul
Off topic but amusing* update from Birmingham today: The agency bin men who were replacing the striking employees have themselves gone on strike.
* Obviously it's not in the slightest bit amusing for those who have to live in Birmingham, but they did vote for this council.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 13:46 GMT wolfetone
Re: £14M Oracle overhaul
The underlying issue with the strikes is what it's about.
BCC have another equal pay matter that they feel can only be fixed by asking the original bin men to take a pay cut/agree to job losses. The bin men, rightly, say no. The proper fix for this is to obviously pay the women the proper amount that their male co-workers get, but they instead want the women to keep on their low pay and ask the men to join them.
That's the crux of it, and sadly it's so entrenched within the council that it's immune to political swing/bias.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 15:12 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: £14M Oracle overhaul
That's a view certainly, but the council created the problem of sweetheart bonus pay for the bin men in the first place, that was the cause of the original equal ops problem. Whilst the council negotiated their way out of that, they then went for a second sweetheart deal with the binmen to create a few better paid WCRO roles that few if any other councils have, until that too was recognised as bin men favouritism that would be construed in the same way. The curious thing is that most bin men went on strike over the WCRO role, even though most were not of that grade and therefore didn't benefit. This was traditional 1960s unionism, "I'm alright, Jack".
-
Thursday 4th December 2025 02:34 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: £14M Oracle overhaul
“ BCC have another equal pay matter that they feel can only be fixed by asking the original bin men to take a pay cut/agree to job losses. The bin men, rightly, say no. The proper fix for this is to obviously pay the women the proper amount that their male co-workers get, but they instead want the women to keep on their low pay and ask the men to join them.”
Wrong. The issue is whether a female school cook should be paid the same as some one working on the bin lorries. They are not co-workers, they’re doing completely different jobs. I’m paraphrasing, but that’s the crux of the issue.
Imagine if we had the same pay grades in IT regardless of your role? This is an IT rag after all?
-
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 1st December 2025 12:01 GMT Anonymous Coward
Will they ever learn?
It appears not.
Why make this sort of crass, stupid and ugly decision when the Brum disaster is right there for all in UK Local Government to see?
Perhaps the sight of certain brown coloured bits of paper changing hands might explain it.
I hope that the penalty clauses are legally as tight as a pair of handcuffs.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 13:56 GMT Brewster's Angle Grinder
during the 'blueprinting' design phase of the implementation we will understand how Oracle best practice delivers in scope work processes, with the mindset that we will adopt those ways of working and focus critically through the implementation on change management to support colleagues to work in different ways in the future.
It sounds like they at least understand the problem. It will be interesting to see if it works in practice.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 16:27 GMT Like a badger
The Edinburgh University Oracle fuck-up was down to poor communication and poor change management when trying to have people adopt new processes rather than bend the new IT to fit the old process.
Seems either way you do it, there's a very good chance of it going horribly wrong. From personal experience SAP is as bad as Oracle in these respects, and I'd guess the same for any other mature ERP.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 17:21 GMT Missing Semicolon
It probably is the case that the people specifying the solution and planning the migration actually have no idea what processes are actually in use. They will find out (as Birmingham did) when someone tries to pay a bill, or purchase a service nobody thinks about, or commission some public good delivered in a non-conventional manner.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 17:51 GMT ChoHag
> It sounds like they at least understand the problem. It will be interesting to see if it works in practice.
It won't and it won't.
They're planning (and paying) to replace a system that's taken several years to get working with an expensive shiney from a company known only for how much blood it can draw. Even a Brummy could work it out now.
-
-
Monday 1st December 2025 16:12 GMT Anonymous Coward
Plus ça change…
"The current solution has been highly customized to meet the needs of professional back-office teams and end users. The customizations have led to the higher workloads, just to 'keep the lights on.' The technology is not intuitive or cost effective and requires a high level of maintenance. The current solution and business processes are noted by the council as being clunky, outdated, and non-intuitive. The user experience is inconsistent, with many processes being managed manually 'offline,'" the report said.
And they laughably think that the highly customized, high workload, not intuitive (etc) new Oracle system will be any different?
-
Monday 1st December 2025 18:13 GMT Tron
Just go back to paper.
They can use non-networked computers to print the forms, letters, envelopes and add up the numbers. Much, much cheaper.
They all used to do it like that and it worked OK.
These huge pieces of complex software cost a fortune and only last for a couple of years before they need to be updated/replaced.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 18:33 GMT Anonymous Coward
This will only get worse
With the Starmer shower pushing for mega local authorities I'm sure that more than a few will discover that their existing ERP can't cope with a few hundred thousand more plebs to bill so they'll go out to tender for another system. My local authority will soon disappear as it merges with Blasingspoke and Deane some 25 miles away. Out here on the periphery of the county, we will get the rancid droppings of expenditure. No more new sports centre(despite the funds already being allocated) , no potholes fixed, no nothing apart from ballooning Councilor Expenses (44 miles @45p per mile 2-3 times a week) instead of 2-4 miles 2-3 times a week.
Abandon hope all ye who live here (and everywhere else afflicted by this disease).
Oh, and apply for your bus pass now as after the new bunch of clowns take over, they will be axed.
-
Monday 1st December 2025 23:07 GMT Pascal Monett
"the council has spent years getting the SAP system to fit its needs"
Yeah, it's called SAP.
It's what they do. They get a team of "experts" you pay for and that team is a bunch of leeches whose only goal is to stay on for as long as possible. They promise the moon, and deliver a tiny asteroid which is targeted directly at the budget.
I ask for one successful SAP implementation to be proven wrong. Go ahead, find one.
Just one.