And none of them would be legal in EU
and many other countries. Only some countries set winnings above human life.
Picture the scene: It's Christmas morning and your child is happily chatting with the AI-enabled teddy bear you got them when you hear it telling them about sexual kinks, where to find the knives, and how to light matches. This is not a hypothetical scenario. As we head into the holiday season, consumer watchdogs at the …
You assume that, but there are two points you should keep in mind:
1. Some of the laws you are probably thinking about, like the GDPR, allow you to do many things if you write them down somewhere. The report quotes many legal documents explaining what's going to happen to your data, and there's far more that GDPR allows you to do as long as the user has been informed than things it completely prohibits. Doing sketchy things can be legal if you tell people about it.
2. They're not enforcing those laws very strongly. Lots of illegal things under GDPR have happened. Not all of them have been investigated. Not all of the ones specifically reported to data protection authorities have been investigated. Not all of those reported by people with lots of money and lawyers get investigated. What makes you think these things, ostensibly basic toys, are going to get investigated? It may be illegal, but if nobody ever does anything about it, it doesn't look as if it was.
For all I know, you're including more laws than just GDPR. I could easily imagine a toy that tells children about matches being considered a product safety risk, but I could also see the laws never having been written to handle such a thing because the item itself isn't setting the fire, it's just giving more instructions about how something else could than we want. Just because something is dangerous doesn't mean the law intended to prevent dangerous things necessarily prevents it. Your confidence that the laws actually do handle this and that they'll have enough of or any effect seems optimistic to me.
I'll tell you where I live. I live in a world where I thought GDPR was going to make lots of abuses illegal because the law said it and there were nice large penalties, large enough to keep things in line. I lived in a world where I let my optimism run wild. And I live in the world you have to live in where there has been almost no effect from what looked like a revolutionary privacy law. Where it's rarely enforced, and when it is it's against companies that did relatively little compared to the obvious abuses of larger tech companies. Where despite the law's ineffectiveness, politicians from the same countries that passed it are trying to weaken it. I need more than the confident assertions from someone to actually believe that these things get enforced. You disliked my "pseudo examples", which I wasn't really writing as examples, but I note you mentioned not a single piece of legislation that would stop these, not a single enforcement body, not a single example of these things not being available. If specificity is your objection, then why don't you cite the reasons for your confidence, since you must have them if you're not making assumptions.
I think you'll find it taught you nothing about driving, but did teach you fine motor control and hand-to-eye coordination, and lots about the physics of momentum and friction... driving like a bell-end is entirely on you!
As for Kumma Bear, my first thought was the clue's in the name - or is that just me?
I wonder what happens when these "toys" are taken away from the home and lose their link back to the manufacturers servers.
ideally they would just do nothing, but other options include saying "Tell mummy and daddy they need to buy the 5g addon for teddy" or simply screaming "I'm scared... take me home" until they get a wifi signal again.
I still don't trust teddy ruxpin... he's evil I tell ya.
An AI toy with no WiFi will go something like this. It'll scar the little tikes for life.
" HAL: [His shutdown] I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid. Good afternoon, gentlemen. I am a HAL 9000 computer. I became operational at the H.A.L. plant in Urbana, Illinois on the 12th of January 1992. My instructor was Mr. Langley, and he taught me to sing a song. If you'd like to hear it I can sing it for you.
Dave Bowman: Yes, I'd like to hear it, HAL. Sing it for me.
HAL: It's called "Daisy."
HAL: [sings while slowing down] Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do. I'm half crazy all for the love of you. It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage. But you'll look sweet upon the seat of a bicycle built for two."
decades ago? And I am not thinking Gremlins.
Shove the kids' fluffy toys into the microwave for 20 minutes should sort out the electronics - bit like shoving a red hot poker through the back of the head of the insane marketing and product development types who dreamt up this dangerous nonsense albeit nowhere as satisfying.
On a par with a jack·in·the·box that pops out pulling the ring of a live grenade (Mills bomb in a box.) Nothing like starting Xmas day with a bang. That's how to do it Mr …Mills?
After all, just look at the shit people buy their kids that mostly get used illegally. Drones, battery powered ride on cars with overridden speed limiters, e-scooters that are illegal in public areas, e-bikes that exceed the regulated limits etc., etc., etc. Not to mention Furbies from years ago.