Re: Not bad
"Blueprints and manuals are very helpful, aren't they."
They are. NASA has had them since the 1960s.
The point, in case you missed it, is not China's tendency to imitate, copy, reverse-engineer and use espionage. (Which is very real, no argument there.) Doing this in the 2020s rather than the 1960s also helps: there's so much advanced tech available off-the-shelf today then there was back then. Look no further than SpaceX: their progress would have been unthinkable in the previous century. But that's not what I'm trying to say here.
What I'm getting at is that the difference lies in China having the will do do it and and the way they are are currently putting their backs into it.
Blueprints and manuals are invaluable. NASA has had them for years. Yet the idea of having American boots back on the moon in this decade is pipe dream. Unless they do something really ass-backward, like breaking out those old blueprints and essentially recreating Apollo hardware with a new-looking paint job simply to beat everyone else. But I doubt that, because the don't have the budget to splurge on a PR stunt that won't move the US space program forward in any way.