This sounds like a job for a cargo Zeppelin
Network operator ponders building a new submarine cable – on land
African carrier Seacom is investigating the feasibility of building a submarine cable that would run across the heart of Africa, on land. Senior Transmission Architect Nic Breytenbach explained that apparent contradiction to The Register by pointing out that submarine cables run up and down Africa’s east and west coasts, but …
COMMENTS
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 13:06 GMT Alan Brown
Not really
The problem with big gasbags is that they're extremely suceptible to weather - microbursts driving them into the ground are bad, but updrafts taking them high is even more dangerous, particularly to crew. (Lack of oxygen is a big issue at 20k feet) and to structural integrity (bursting risk, and venting gas to avoid that happening can lead to them crashing into the ground shortly afterwards)
The actual cargo capacity of a zeppelin isn't very high, putting them around the chaotic air of a mountain range is a spectacularly bad idea and while it might be a passable idea for wide open spaces a Caterpilar D10 equipped with mole plow is a more practical option. You can't just drape a cable like this across the scenery and expect it not to be chewed on by wildlife or damaged by rockfalls, never mind the humans along the way
Terrestrial cable laying tech is pretty mature. The issue is powering terminals in isolated areas and that's where the idea of using line powered submarine cable repeaters comes in. The 100% optical ones seem like science fiction when you look at them.
As far as optical fibre cables being less susceptible to copper thieves goes - experience demonstrates that thieves will dig it up/cut it anyway and only abandon the attempts when they don't find copper. The average criminal isn't particularly bright...
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 08:17 GMT Richard 12
Political instability nixes it
Doesn't matter whether it's mostly in swamps and rivers, it would be very shallow and trivially destroyed.
It's far more difficult to cut a cable 100m down at the bottom of the Red Sea in a busy shipping lane, than to cut one five metres down a few hundred km from the nearest town.
It's also far easier to repair that Red Sea cable.
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 18:47 GMT Annihilator
Re: Political instability nixes it
Power is the reason. They wanted to use submarine cable tech, because the optical repeaters are powered by the cable itself.
Microwave repeaters need height, and power, or they're stuffed. And they've only got about 40-50 miles range, so you'd need about 100 of them stretched across Africa. A cable largely disappears over time and isn't visible.
-
Tuesday 4th November 2025 10:36 GMT Eric 9001
Re: Political instability nixes it
Microwave line-of-site transmitters are commonly in use in the deserts of Africa - as fibre laid in shifting sand promptly breaks.
Repeater stations can only transmit so far and need power at every repeater location, which would be significantly more expensive than a single fibre with optically, or aluminum wire powered repeaters - as power only needs to be supplied at both ends of such cable.
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 08:26 GMT Anonymous Coward
"parts of the route are only accessible by helicopter."
Presumably if you are going to dig a trench and lay cable, the access would need to be improved.
I shouldn't be surprised if building a railway along the cable's route, as you go, would be a comparatively small incremental cost.
Loved the Fitzcarraldo reference. They don't make
Claudiasmovies like that anymore. :)-
Monday 3rd November 2025 09:29 GMT Alex 72
Re: "parts of the route are only accessible by helicopter." so Improve access and build a railway
100% this if 2 for profit entities and however many governments could cooperate. The passenger and cargo carrying across Africa of a reasonable railway using tunnels and viaducts, with appropriate security guarantees from the African union, on top o a viable route for data, might make this workable. It would be good for the environment, and economy, how much less co2 and €£$ would it cost to send a long train of containers close to where they are going vs a diesel truck with no secured route? How much faster would it be when responding to a natural disaster, or even just plain old peaks in demand?
bootnote: Whilst this bundling makes it feasible, whether the requisite cooperation can be achieved, and sustained long enough is an open question, even in a single comparatively stable country this is not always a given, in this scenario it would take some doing.
-
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 09:55 GMT Alex 72
Re: Valuable
Africa has plenty of wealth and parts of the route will be more secure than parts of the USA. The problem is first what is now the UK but both then and now too often refers to itself as England even when it means a union including others, then the USA along with countless others along the way stole a lot of wealth from Africa already. Developing first, the societies that can accept immigration accidentally steal some of the top talent, add in the proxy wars of Russia/China vs US/Europe/Canada and there are enough unstable parts of the continent to make crossing it tricky.
Not on the route but Morocco for example has been a stable monarchy much, much longer than the USA has existed, they are peacefully democratising (albeit slowly) without outside interference, and even though the UK and the rest Europe were awful neighbours, Morocco now welcomes tourists and even migrants from Europe(the continent not the union) including the UK. Lesotho for example has a huge diamond reserve but ordinary people there see none of the benefits of the profits made selling them to this day.
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 09:44 GMT Big_Boomer
Why?
If they need more capacity around South Africa, then add more capacity there. Trying to build it across land on the least politically stable continent on the planet is going to be damned near impossible. Even once in place and operating, a regime change in any one of the nations it traverses will end up with threats to cut it unless $$$$ are forthcoming. Also, chances are that laying the cable around South Africa will be WAY cheaper than building a reasonably secure over/under land cable.
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 11:36 GMT Alex 72
Re: Why?
The guardian said "submarine cable costs about $40,000 a mile" the potential savings by shortening the route are large, also the plan is not to do this instead of coastal routes but alongside for resilience. There are significant barriers to sustainable security along the route and sustainable maintenance access. But "it's less bonkers than it sounds".
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 11:57 GMT awomanmanhasaname
Liquid Telecom has a cable network across Southern/Eastern Africa from coast to coast covering Tanzania, Congo, Kenya, Zimbabwe and Angola.
East West is done (no issue overbuilding though I question the financial wisdom : see Quintillion and several British altnets)
https://www.liquiddataport.com/terrestrial/
What's really missing is a North South cable and the best option is from Algeria to Niger. Since the distance that's missing from Fibre coverage from Arlit to In Guezzam by road is just short of 250km as seen in this coverage map
https://www.liquiddataport.com/map/
This document is clearer
https://liquid.tech/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LIT-Fibre-Map-Sept23-Global.pdf
Covered in this article
https://liquid.tech/about-us/news/liquid-dataport-launches-its-shortest-fibre-route/
If you notice, they've done this twice
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 13:03 GMT Dwarf
Whats new
Haven't we been running cables across land for decades - just in ductwork that is under ground and just under the surface with a trench cutter (ditch witch or similar)
I can't see how leaving cables on the surface would be good, far too many hazards to the cables due to them being caught up in machinery, bent in funny angles / places, etc.
The only reason they are left as-is under sea is because there is no other sensible way to do it and the risk from true accidenal damage from boats and subs is fairly minor.
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 13:31 GMT Jellied Eel
Re: Whats new
I can't see how leaving cables on the surface would be good, far too many hazards to the cables due to them being caught up in machinery, bent in funny angles / places, etc.
I doubt they will be on the surface, and would have to be trenched and ducted.
The wording of the article is a bit confusing as a terrestrial cable obviously isn't going to be a submarine cable. All it seems to be doing is borrowing from submarine cable concepts and using line power. That reduces the need (and cost) of finding and powering regen sites. Those still kind of exist, except they're spliced into the cable and then fed from the power core. It'll be interesting to see if they get funding and the final route selection, which is kind of a linked exercise. So which countries & cities end up chipping into the costs. Then those locations can have PoP's that host the SLT & PFE kit, and muxes to drop capacity along the route. So kind of a dry version of classical systems like SE-ME-WE with 'landing stations' along the route. It'll probably also be possible to increase the fibre count as the 'dry torpedos' doing the regen won't have to deal with all the stresses of a deep, wet system.
-
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 13:08 GMT Anonymous Coward
Dig very deep and let the ultimate mole machine loose across the continent. It can drag the cable along with it then. Just hope it doesn't pop up or out of somewhere anyone can see it because you didn't get your depth right.
I know Openreach have used moles for short distances, I do wonder how long one could go on for without getting stuck.
-
Tuesday 4th November 2025 10:36 GMT Eric 9001
Moles won't make it very far - as those can only trench through soil, as far as the pneumatic air supply and piping can handle and will stop on encountering a rock layer.
A small boring machine will make it further, but those need to be babysit, with a conveyor belt taking away evacuated material and will get stuck on encountering rock that is too hard, or to soft, or the wrong type of soil or sand.
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 14:37 GMT rg287
As awomanmanhasaname menions, Liquid have an east-west connector already, albeit a bit south of where Seacom are looking. So that seems to be an issue of routing, connectivity and capacity than engineering. Can an ISP in Kenya peer/send traffic to an ISP on the west coast using that link, or will the route go via Europe or South Africa due to routing? Likewise, will an ISP in Mozambique be able to route traffic up to Kenya, across Africa and out to a west coast point, or will it - again - route via the coast?
That said, some submarine cable tech could be of use. Following the Congo, a river-bed plough that buries cable (not just dropping it on the surface of the riverbed) could get you from the west coast - Port Banana - all the way past Kinshasha to Kisangani. It;s a wiggly route, but we're not doing high speed trading over it, and it passes a lot of cities - which tend to cluster around major rivers!
From Kisangani, you've then got the mountainy bit to get across the African Rift Valley, through Rwanda/Uganda/Burundi into Tanzania/Kenya and down to the coast.
The Congo is... a large river. A cable buried deep in the bed would not be readily accessible to vandals, albeit the same might apply to repair teams! It does dispense with having to carve a line across central Africa. Of course, buidling a railway from Kinshasa to Kampala and/or Mwansa (linking across the top of the N-S lines at Ilebo and Kindu), would do wonders for mobility across that region, and you can lay in some fibre while you're at it alongside the railway's comms hardware.
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 14:52 GMT Anonymous Coward
Interesting
So far, it has been wireless technology that has won the day in sub Saharan Africa (mobile networks, Starlink) but the idea seems intriguing.
Judging by the name, I take it the interviewed gentleman is an African himself and intimately familiar with the challenges facing the idea, but also with the possible advantages.
Once thing is guaranteed: if this ever comes to fruition it won't be designed or built by any Western company. It will be a Sino-African or Hindo-African partnership, with perhaps the Russians playing a minor role.
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 15:20 GMT IGotOut
Ready that entire article....
...just seemed to have as much relevance to reality as a nuclear powered concept car.
Heat is an issue, but look they put it in a lake, so is feasible. Because a lake is thermally identical to solid rock or sand near the equator.
Politics could be an issue. No shit. Your talking about active conflict zones and / or areas riddled with massive levels of corruption.
Transport of cables could be an issue. Well I've an atomic powered truck you could invest in. I've got mock-ups in MS paint and everything. I'm going to use AI to build it.
Of course,vwe could always use the Boring Company to build a hyperloop, that's should of already built one from New York to LA by now.
-
Monday 3rd November 2025 16:18 GMT goblinski
...But Breytenbach points to the existence of a submarine cable in Lake Tanganyika as evidence submarine systems can be adapted to different environments...
The second-deepest lake in the world (500m average depth with 1400m+ at its deepest) is the absolute, slam dunk best comparison he could pull for passing a cable in a swamp. It is absolutely clear that said lake is closer to terra firma conditions than to submarine conditions. Good call !!!
Where do I invest ??? Pretty please? I'm asking for a friend.
Also, is it April 1st already ? I know we switched off DST yesterday in my neck of the woods, did I set the clock too far back ?