You know you would...
...given unlimited time, money and space. What kid hasn't dreamed of having his own aircraft cockpit out in the shed/basement/garage? I expect to see the result in a future Geek's Guide article.
How far would you take your flight simulation hobby? Perhaps some extra screens? Maybe some custom controllers? Or would you go as far as to revive a scrapped Boeing 747 cockpit to satisfy your simulation needs? In the heart of Silicon Valley, a dedicated group of enthusiasts is reviving the cockpit of a scrapped Boeing 747 to …
Nowhere near the same league but in my model train build project stating sometime next year I want some realism on the controller for the locomotive that is closer to real life
Working on PIC programming to have the speed control input midway position to be neutral so that increasing it adds "power" and reducing below it applies the the brakes - just like the control stick in a real loco. In the neutral position the train will just "coast" slowly reducing speed do to an artificial drag
Now adding AWS/TPS will be a bit more challenging !
https://flightsim.to/file/40862/boeing-747-sca
Someone should do a simulation video of Discovery being ferried from Virginia to Houston...
https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/09/cornyn_smithsonian_shuttle_comments/
I always thought I'd like a flight simulator on my PC. That was until the day I went to a friends who used to fly a lot for business. When I turned up he said, "Oh, just about to land at Dublin on the route I take there most months."
While I couldn't fault is enthusiasm and obvious enjoyment from it, it just felt a little sad to me and put me off getting my own.
While being an avid aviation enthusiast, I have trouble getting excited about setting altitude, airspeed and course, just in order to bore a hole through the sky.
This is why I trend towards the more dynamic ways of flying; soaring, combat simulators and similar. Still, If flying London-Dubai (or Kerbal-Mun) in realtime is what floats your boat, then feel free to enjoy it.
At least it is not a stamp collection.
"While being an avid aviation enthusiast, I have trouble getting excited about setting altitude, airspeed and course, just in order to bore a hole through the sky."
And that there is precisely the reason these lads have chosen a B747-200 with the old style instrumentation; because you have to actually fly the plane. And going back to the beginnings of manned spaceflight, some of the earlier Gemini astronauts complained bitterly that they were nothing more than highly trained monkeys due to the high level of automation, and campaigned (successfully) for a technology backstep in order to reintroduce some element of human control.
I would not take Chuck Yeager's words on anything. He appears very much to have been the living proof of the saying "never meet your heroes".
While the Mercury astronaut program may have been run fast and loose, things tightened up quickly. Shuttle astronauts were expected to know every system in the shuttle with incredible granularity.
This is why I trend towards the more dynamic ways of flying; soaring, combat simulators and similar. Still, If flying London-Dubai (or Kerbal-Mun) in realtime is what floats your boat, then feel free to enjoy it.
Having done many hundreds of hours in real GA aircraft including tailwheel, aeros, complex and multi, simulation at a level I can afford doesn't even come close to the experience of hands and feet on controls with actual air running over the connected control surfaces, so the video game aspect does nothing for me. Without G, manouvering a SIM is really quite pointless. But a SIM does do a really excellent job of procedural flying, so I can get the real approach/departure plates for an airport and set up some below minima weather and fly a hold and then approach to decision height and fly missed approach back to the hold and have another go. I don't do long transits between airports, but I do set myself up IFR nav tasks.
I get that. But when I used to play around years ago with flight sims, it was the technicalities of take offs and landings, and short hops, that appealed, something to keep the brain active.
I did a few long hauls, but always requested my wife provide an in-flight trolley service to keep things real. She drew the line at the mile-high club simulation though....
of working with Boeing drawings (twice full size and zero dimensions) back in 1970 to make the cockpit of a South African Airways B747-200 Flight Simulator.
We would spread the drawings out on the floor of the 'Erection Shop' at Redifon Flight Simulation in Crawley and measure each part so that we could draw them up to be made.
such was the life of an apprentice back then.
KE 907 Korean Air
ICN Seoul - LHR London
Scheduled arrival 16:30 GMT
Estimated 15:58 GMT
https://www.flightstats.com/v2/flight-tracker/KE/907?year=2025&month=10&date=31
https://www.heathrow.com/arrivals/terminal-4/flight-details/KE907/31-10-2025?search=arrivals
May be a watercannon salute/welcome?