back to article Benioff retreats from idea of sending troops in to clean up San Francisco

San Francisco’s political establishment rounded on Marc Benioff over the weekend after the Salesforce founder backed the idea of sending in the National Guard to clean up the city’s streets. By late Sunday Benioff took to Twitter to clarify that he believed the best people to manage public safety in San Francisco was… San …

  1. nematoad Silver badge

    Benioff is wrong.

    “We don’t have cops, so if they can be cops, I’m all for it,”

    Well even if he is "all for it", neither the National Guard nor the regular armed forces can just jump in and start policing San Francisco.

    There's a little thing called the Posse Comitatus Act; https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/posse-comitatus-act-explained, that bans soldiers, marines etc from doing the job of the police.

    Trump doesn't seem to understand that but he is being schooled by federal judges in Los Angeles, Portland and Chicago.

    Benioff might not want to pay out for extra policing but drafting in armed troops is not the way that things are done.

    1. Brl4n

      Re: Benioff is wrong.

      Government stopped obeying its written laws decades ago.

      1. Gary Stewart Silver badge

        Re: Benioff is wrong.

        Mostly no, but there have been some serious exceptions. See the secret bombings and invasions of Cambodia and Laos, Watergate, and Iran-Contra just off the top of my head. Anybody noticing a pattern here? If you have something of equal disregard for the law and the Constitution please add them. I have witnessed them all and nothing, absolutely nothing compares to the blatant, in your face and up your ass lawlessness and corruption of the current regime. The hypocrisy of crying about imagined weaponization from the previous administration compared to the openly obvious weaponization by the current regime is enough to make any sane person long for at least two (see no evil, hear no evil) of the three monkey solution.

        And don't add any of the "lawfare" Bovine Squeezings from the most prolific liar in US political history. Trump was caught red handed hiding stolen documents, some of them classified. He tried to extort Ukraine to manufacture dirt or at least to say they were investigating a rival candidate and the State of Georgia to "find" more votes (did anybody other than JD check out the couch cushions?). He tried and failed to block the lawful transfer of power using violent and hateful rhetoric to incite the violence that did occur*, and he was indited and convicted by UNANIMOUS votes in the grand jury and trial jury of 34 felony counts. All of these have ample evidence to convict him on all charges. At yet here he sits on his golden throne squeezing out more greasy black venom as he types his incoherent babblings and unlawful edicts onto the internet causing untold havoc across the entire United States. Aided and abetted by his gaggle of nobhopper "republicans" in congress, the Supine Court, and the 10's of millions of MAGAs that support him as they all sing in unison, "owning the libs, winning, winning, winning, please sir may I have another". So far we are holding on only by the hair on our chinny chin chins, I guess now was a bad time to shave my beard.

        * the "go peacefully" so often used to lie about his rhetoric on that day occurred almost three hours after it started. Before the beginning it was "fight like hell".

        1. SundogUK Silver badge

          Re: Benioff is wrong.

          Must be strange living in your head.

          1. Al-ba-tross!

            Re: Benioff is wrong.

            Must be strange going through life as a raging fascist.

          2. martinusher Silver badge

            Re: Benioff is wrong.

            Nah, its a pretty good observation about life in contemporary America.

            There's not really a whole lot the military can do that the police can't. They lack the intelligence infrastructure to do effective day to day policing. They can help out with logistics following a natural disaster and supplement law enforcement if there's large scale rioting but they have to be working under the auspices of law enforcement to be effective and so far they're just not wanted. (The most effective use of National Guard troops in DC, for example, has been trash pickup.)

            What I find puzzling is that we've heard all sorts of justifications over the years for widespread weapons ownership from organized groups like the NRA such as "You need them to push back against government if it becomes oppressive" but when we get obvious governmental overreach we don't hear a peep from them. I personally think its because the real gun nuts are in reality a very small minority -- most Americans just don't feel the need to carry weapons -- and that minority has largely been recruited by ICE (Despite an apparently unlimited budget and a flood of applicants ICE is actually rather selective about who it hires -- and its not because it has high hiring standards.)

          3. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Benioff is wrong.

            Must be strange living in your head.

            Isn't it time for your walkies?

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Benioff is wrong.

      > .. There's a little thing called the Posse Comitatus Act ..

      There is a precedent. President Lyndon B. Johnson invoked the Insurrection Act of 1807 in response to the Detroit riots of July 1967.

      1. spacecadet66

        Re: Benioff is wrong.

        ...which was in response to events that were actually happening in the real non-made-up world.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Benioff is wrong.

          Yeah, and quite interestingly, there was also back then a dubious "narrative about falling property values and rising crime that were the nexus that, for white people [in the Detroit region], made the policing strategies acceptable". Policing in the style of (based on Ron Scott's account): "Nigger, if you breathe I'll blow your head off".

          Is that what Benioff wants (and the White House), a return to racist white police officers (or the contemporary equivalent relative to whomever is currently disfavored by real estate flip artists) and related brutality, steamrolled through via military action?!

          1. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

            Re: Benioff is wrong.

            Do you even have to ask?

          2. spacecadet66

            Re: Benioff is wrong.

            So we're just asking rhetorical questions now?

            Also what do you mean "return" to racist white police officers? Did they go away at some point when I wasn't paying attention?

        2. Taliesinawen

          Re: Benioff is wrong.

          > ...which was in response to events that were actually happening in the real non-made-up world

          The Portland riots aren't being instigated by the Soros financed Antifa :o

          1. spacecadet66

            Re: Benioff is wrong.

            Just a couple of clarifying questions:

            1. What riots?

            2. What antifa?

            3. What Soros funding?

    3. Malcolm Weir

      Re: Benioff is wrong.

      Salesforce's "Dreamforce" event is a private event not open to the public. Is there any reason why the City & County of San Francisco should provide security for free? Also, if you _can_ hire 200 off-duty cops, that sort of suggests that there are at least 200 cops available for emergencies of any kind...

      1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: Benioff is wrong.

        Isn't Benioff French? So none of this constitution rubbish applies to the filthy foreign immigrant anyway.

      2. MyffyW Silver badge

        Re: Benioff is wrong.

        In my experience those Salesforce characters can be a right hoot when they've had a couple of organic IPAs. Just as well they have 200 police of stand-by, save us from a clicks-not-code riot between an elephant in a hoodie and a bespectacled donkey.

  2. DarkwavePunk Silver badge

    Slobbering

    All of this two-faced drooling boot-licking crap is getting tedious. Sure, these companies have to walk a tightrope, but their public statements waft around just as much as Trump's brain farts. Never going to change. All corporations are going to suck up to whichever party is in power. Depressing reality.

    1. DS999 Silver badge

      Re: Slobbering

      There is performative dick sucking to keep Trump off your back like most of them are doing, and there is openly sucking his dick in front of the entire world. If Salesforce was a consumer products company I'd quit buying their products just to avoid giving that turd any of my hard earned money. However, since they don't sell to me I can hope that he loses a few sales from big companies whose leaders don't make a big deal out of it because they don't want to upset the orange pedo, but choose to spend their company's money with someone else.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The corporats have found the one thing they see as valuable

    Not schools, not infrastructure (to their assets no less), not hospitals but police and jails.

    Remember when they ask you for more.

  4. Aladdin Sane Silver badge

    Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

    Does this strike anybody else not from the US as a bit odd?

    1. EricM Silver badge

      Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

      Yes, in other countries private security services also exist, but are typically not employing off-duty law enforcement personnel.

      So police officers in the US seem to be paid so low, that many of them need a second (or third job).

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

        Cops are paid absurdly well. A probationary deputy in my county gets 50k a year for a starting wage (now being moved to 60k "due to inflation"), while a fresh Sergeant can pull 90k. That doesn't even count the overtime fraud they commit by idling in a parking garage. Or by taking security jobs which get paid more because they can use their police powers to effect an arrest.

        Mind, the median household income in florida is $40k.

      2. O'Reg Inalsin Silver badge

        Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

        From "Bandana Resources: How Much Do SFPD Officers Make?", which is recruiting for the SFPD: As an SFPD recruit in the academy, you start with an annual salary of $112,398, equating to approximately $53.89 per hour. This competitive starting pay makes SFPD one of the highest-paying law enforcement agencies in the Bay Area, ensuring you’re financially supported from day one. ... Salaries for SFPD officers increase significantly with experience and tenure. After seven years of service, officers earn $164,164 per year, which is approximately $68.65 per hour. With average overtime (7 hours a week), officers can expect total compensation of around $201,663 annually. For the top 10% of earners, total compensation, including overtime, can exceed $288,887 per year.

        1. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

          Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

          And they still have to commute 3-4 hours each way every day because they can't afford to live in town?

      3. MasterDave

        Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

        Enrty level in a major city is pretty low pay, 40-50k first couple of years which is pretty much poverty level in any major city. It does ramp up to 125k by the time you survive 5-6 years on the job though, which a lot of folks never do.

        So, the off-duty cops are almost all the least trained and least experienced, until you get to the career cops that are divorced and do it because they've got problems and want to take it out on a random person every once in a while now that their wife is gone and they can't take it out on them.

        Not really a great situation honestly anywhere that has to do it.

      4. Aladdin Sane Silver badge

        Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

        In the UK, police are allowed second jobs with permission, but can't do anything that conflicts with their police duties such as being a security guard.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

      Police officers, even if off-duty, can detain, arrest, carry firearms, use said firearms, etc, in ways that a civilian security guard cannot.

      1. Korev Silver badge
        Coat

        Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

        Fair Cop Guv

      2. Aladdin Sane Silver badge

        Re: Salesforce has to pay for “hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers”

        This is not a good thing.

  5. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    Perhaps the shareholders should seek to have him removed on medical grounds. If he can contradict himself so blatantly without appearing to recognise it he may have cognitive problems.

    1. Aladdin Sane Silver badge

      He recognises it, he just doesn't give a shit.

      1. MonkeyJuice Silver badge

        And why should he? Are companies really going to ditch a back office supplier to make a statement?

    2. gnasher729 Silver badge

      If he talks absolute nonsense, and some time later realises it was indefensible bullshit, then a reasonable person _would_ say that they were wrong the first time round. It wouldn’t be a cognitive problem, but quite the opposite.

    3. ChrisElvidge Silver badge

      Could do same to President, for same reasons?

  6. Dan 55 Silver badge

    Benioff not the sharpest crayon in the box

    On Friday he thought all those unsightly homeless people were going to be removed, but then by Sunday he'd realised the shuttle buses full of H1B staff would be rounded up.

    1. chivo243 Silver badge

      Re: Benioff not the sharpest crayon in the box

      Ha! Sharp crayons! Good one!

  7. Brave Coward Bronze badge

    Pots and kettles

    'Elon Musk jumped on to X to endorse the National Guard moving in and condemning downtown San Francisco as a “drug zombie apocalypse”.'

    This, from a confirmed drug zombie.

    1. Paul Crawford Silver badge
      Facepalm

      Re: Pots and kettles

      He wants more policing, but will be damned if he is going to pay more taxes to cover it.

      1. SundogUK Silver badge

        Re: Pots and kettles

        He's paying enough taxes to cover it. San Francisco just keep spending it on DEI managers.

    2. Flocke Kroes Silver badge

      Re: Pots and kettles

      SF should start by arresting high profile felons and debtors.

  8. Arboreal Astronaut

    SF's homelessness problem is a housing problem

    San Francisco has some of the most expensive real estate in the world, and most of the city's land area is zoned exclusively for single-family homes at a typical maximum height of 2 stories.

    Tourists in San Francisco generally spend their time in the northeastern half of the city, whose development largely predates WWII -- by contrast, nearly the entire southwestern half of the city was built out in the immediate post-WWII era as a vast uninterrupted tract of near-identical, builder-grade, low-density houses, whose suburban-style qualities were reportedly part of the original inspiration for the Malvina Reynolds song "Little Boxes".

    If San Francisco and the surrounding cities were built in the style of a first-rank European metro area, with districts consisting largely of 4-6 story mixed-use buildings and densely-packed narrow townhomes/flats, the city's homelessness crisis would look vastly different.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: SF's homelessness problem is a housing problem

      No it wouldn't. Most of the homeless problem in SF is associated with mental illness and drug addiction. All the housing in the world won't fix the root cause. That's just pie in the sky thinking.

      1. Arboreal Astronaut

        Re: SF's homelessness problem is a housing problem

        Mentally ill drug addicts exist pretty much anywhere on Earth, the main difference is that in San Francisco it's exceptionally hard for them to afford a place to live.

        If you start pumping lethal levels of carbon monoxide into a room full of people, the first people to suffocate to death will probably be the ones with preexisting asthma. What would you describe as the root cause of death by suffocation: the asthma, or the carbon monoxide?

    2. O'Reg Inalsin Silver badge

      Re: SF's homelessness problem is a housing problem

      Contributing factor, yes. Sole reason, no.

      1. Gary Stewart Silver badge

        Re: SF's homelessness problem is a housing problem

        Major contributing factor, yes. Sole reason, no.

    3. chivo243 Silver badge

      Re: SF's homelessness problem is a housing problem

      Pleasant Valley Sunday... here in status symbol land...

  9. Phil Ni'Sophical

    AI plod?

    Given Benioff is such a fan of AI, I'm surprised he didn't suggest it could do the job. That would save him having to splash out on those meat sack security officers.

    1. spacecadet66

      Re: AI plod?

      AI is for the marks, it's not what he's going to use to further his own interests.

  10. ecofeco Silver badge
    FAIL

    The cat is out of hte bag

    The horse done left the barn.

    We now know you for who you are, wanker.

  11. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    What a wanker!

    He doesn’t even live in San Francisco, he spends most of his time in his lair in Hawaii.

    BTW, the Governor’s last name is spelled “Newsom”.

  12. nijam Silver badge

    My idea: send in the National Guard to clean up Salesforce.

  13. Paul Herber Silver badge

    " open air drug taking "

    Maybe both main US political parties need compulsory and continuous drug testing at all levels, right down to local mayors and sheriffs and deputies. And right up to the top.

    And all the business people and lawyers they meet. And media people.

    That'll take the sting out of the US drug market.

  14. An_Old_Dog Silver badge

    Soldiers are Soldiers

    Soldiers are equipped and trained for applying lethal force.

    They are not equipped and trained to be police.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Soldiers are Soldiers

      Sounds like exactly what's needed.

  15. BasicReality

    D.C. already saw the benefits of the National Guard coming in. We need that success in several of these major cities.With all the leftist attacks on the police, recruiting new officers is down. A lot of cities don't have enough police to protect their citizens. Democrats cut the funding instead, it leave the National Guard as the only option left.

    1. disgruntled yank

      > the benefits of the National Guard coming in.

      Yep. They mulched gardens on public property, they did general clean-up and tidy-up work here and there. Most of it was on the level of a high-school kid's public-service project, only carried out by adults in uniform. If you weren't in an area of Washington, DC, that is recognizably so on a TV screen, you wouldn't have seen the guard.

  16. headrush

    From what I've read, crime figures are actually the lowest they've been in years in all these cities that trump is invading. So yes, it's all lies.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like