The Register Home Page

back to article ServiceNow thinks you're doing AI fast and wrong

Three weeks after releasing one of its biannual platform upgrades, ServiceNow has started delivering an "AI Experience." The Register asked why the company chose to vary its usual release cycle, given its "Zurich" upgrade debuted on September 10 and included the "Builder Agent" vibe coding tool, meaning those users who choose …

  1. Tron Silver badge

    'people are not thinking about agentic AI the right way'

    The AI version of 'you're holding it wrong'.

    There are some niche cases where AI could be used, for example as a natural language interface to a locally created or imported reservoir of core data, distributing the source and/or the processing.

    Beyond that, it helps kids cheat in exams and allows morons to pass themselves off as being less thick in e-mails. Not exactly a new dawn for humanity.

    1. Cris E

      Re: 'people are not thinking about agentic AI the right way'

      There are tons of domains where an AI could bang out a 1.0 draft that would save everyone a lot of typing. You want to create a project from company standard templates and set up repositories and service accounts and bl ah blah blah then AI can make for a quick and dirty automation tool. If you need a standard contract pre-filled with your company and client data set up as a starting point then this can be great. First line customer support can be covered easily.

      But if you want a final product or important tasks completed then it's going to continue to require an adult to watch the output and accept ownership of it before sending it out. AI can be a fine intern that saves you money and handles lots of junk tasks, but like interns you can't trust them to do much right and you never let them do important stuff without a ton of supervision. And management has to hold more senior people responsible for any damage caused by the interns they're supposed to be guiding.

      It might be a "you're holding it wrong" case of over-marketing, but anyone who does get hurt by this has abdicated their responsibility as a professional.

      1. GNU Enjoyer
        Angel

        Re: 'people are not thinking about agentic AI the right way'

        If <task> can be completed with slop text outputted from a LLM, then clearly <task> is completely pointless and if something is pointless, it's best not done at all, as you're doing things wrong.

      2. ChrisElvidge Silver badge

        Re: 'people are not thinking about agentic AI the right way'

        You want to create a project from company standard templates and set up repositories and service accounts and blah blah blah

        If you already have a standard template for doing "stuff"; why do you need 'AI' to fuck it up for you?

      3. Radgie Gadgie

        Re: 'people are not thinking about agentic AI the right way'

        And unlike the intern; your AI won't learn from those corrections. Fast forward 10 years, and the replacement oversite staff have been denied the years experience necessary to correct the AI's mistakes.

    2. Martin M

      Re: 'people are not thinking about agentic AI the right way'

      How could you *possibly* be doing it right if you haven’t hooked up your firewall’s configuration via MCP to your helpdesk chat session while they solve a ticket based on arbitrary third party text?

      That should “inject” the potential for rapid change into an organisation, if maybe not in the hoped-for way…

  2. Moldskred

    "Chief Innovation Officer Dave Wright"

    Yes, that certainly sounds like a serious position at a serious company that does serious, actual work.

    1. Cris E

      Clearly AI has worked for Dave, but that may not be extensible to the larger world where someone has to actually do the work.

  3. StewartWhite Silver badge
    Holmes

    Let's change the question to one I CAN answer

    "They use it for things they did before," he said

    Yes, Dave - it's called "work". You may have heard of the word before you disappeared up your own fundament. I pity the poor fool who when asked to run payroll replies that "That's something we did before so I can't do that Dave. I can draw a picture of Paris Hilton as Wilma from Scobby Doo if that would help though."

  4. FirstTangoInParis Silver badge

    Oh goody

    ServiceNow is not particularly good at what it is supposed to do. I guess a bit like SAP, companies have an idea of what they want and end up getting what they are given. And now they are getting it with AI. Lovely.

  5. pmelon

    Service Now is, in my opinion, a big steaming pile of shit. This makes it sound like it’s going to be getting worse, so I’m not sure what metaphor to use going forward.

    1. ManMountain1

      Only someone who works for ServiceNow would downvote this comment, surely.

    2. teebie

      A geyser of shit is worse than a pile.

      Is that the sort of thing you are looking for?

  6. ChrisElvidge Silver badge

    The bot authorizes the offer, diagnoses the glitch as crocked firewall config, and sends IT a ticket to fix that up.

    Who authorised the "crocked firewall config" in the first place?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like