Garbage In
My approach with peeping Toms or Theresas, is to give them a show.
Profound is a startup that promises to help companies understand how they appear in AI responses to customer queries. But one expert in the field thinks the AI analytics startup has been sucking up information on users' AI conversations without proper consent. Lee S Dryburgh, an expert in AI visibility for consumer health and …
My approach with peeping Toms or Theresas, is to give them a show. ...... says Uh, MikeThat still gives them what they want. The only correct way to deal with such sort is to deny them the ability to see anything. .... replies GNU Enjoyer
That's not quite anywhere near the fuller picture, GNU Enjoyer, whenever one cannot unsee and avoid shows that result in systems and services being able to herald and ensure details of one's suitably judicious demise and easy administrative removal from any AI Leading Futures Programs and Derivative Greater IntelAIgent Games Plays.
It's both a prime derivative and sub-prime alternate raison d'être of NEUKlearer HyperRadioProACTive IT Media Mass Management with Tall Virtual Storytelling Tales for both Sale and/or to Rent.
Non of the data is stolen, it was given freely to the third party script add-in used by that little widget you loaded to save a click or two.
My favourite line was 'Free VPN widget' because that'll really protect you from the 'free browser & search tools' grabbing data.
Need something stronger than -->
Your AI conversations are a secret new treasure trove for marketers. And they may not be seeking proper consent
FFS ..... surely not even the likes of the local village idiots would not realise it to be so.
* ....... an increasingly wider recognised Great Unknown and Designedly Further Unknowable
The world continues to build better idiots. ..... Gnisho
Thus guaranteeing to us* worlds devoid of better built idiotic input/output ‽ . ‽ . ‽ .
What's not to like and adore and implore in such a LOVE ...... Live Operational Virtual Environment.
Whilst I agree that Profound's behaviour is highly disturbing and legally dubious, outside of The Register you will find maybe 0.01% of the population who care.
The war has been lost re data privacy - nobody much gives a damn (until they personally are directly affected obviously) as long as they get "free" access to whatever tosh is being peddled on Ex/Twatter etc.