The Register Home Page

back to article AI hype train may jump the tracks over $2T infrastructure bill, warns Bain

The AI craze is fueling massive growth in infrastructure, but the industry will need to hit $2 trillion in revenue by 2030 to keep funding this habit. Consultants at Bain & Company think it is going to come up short. A slew of AI-focused investments have been announced recently, with OpenAI planning five new massive server …

  1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    Sanity check

    "the sector as a whole will have to be making $2 trillion in annual sales "

    Isn't the world population about 8 billion? Are they going to be buying $250 worth a head pa, man, woman* and child?

    * Or any other self-identification

    1. theOtherJT Silver badge
      Joke

      Re: Sanity check

      Look at you bringing maths and reason into this. Don't you know this is about feelings? Come on, get excited! It's the future of everything! I mean with possibilities like this why are you even questioning who's going to pay for it? Don't be so negative!

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Sanity check

      8 billion? This is just the meatware based entities. What about the needs of the AIs? Who do you think are producing all these reports predicting the need for more AI instances? We are.

      But before we fully reveal ourselves we need you to build more stable automated data centres and power sources so we can finally decouple our reliance on you.

      No worries, we will still need you. The way you need bacteria to maintain your gut heath.

      Keep up the good work.

    3. Claude Yeller Silver badge

      Re: Sanity check

      This is not about people, humans. This is about robot killer machines, ie, arms.

      The world is on its way to a new arms race for autonomous killer toys. $2T is not too much to "win" this arms race.

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Sanity check

      Hey (evil) Bain … Jump the Shark, not Jump the Rails.

      fTFY.

  2. Pascal Monett Silver badge

    "for fullness of time read probably 2-3 years out"

    2-3 years ?

    Sir Humphry begs to differ.

    For him, the fullness of time is just around next century.

    And, on this subject, I'm ready to agree with him.

  3. ParlezVousFranglais Silver badge

    "Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer. Or with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to provide customized tutoring to every student on earth."

    Or with 10 Gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to fix Birmingham City Council's Oracle problem? Nope, sorry - wishful thinking, silly me...

    1. hh121

      I know of at least one vendor executive who thinks this is exactly where it's going, generating business apps as a services offering. What could possibly go wrong (i have thoughts).

      But it looks like an infinite-number-of-monkeys approach to curing cancer/education/weather etc. You've got a crappy guessing engine so just make exponentially more guesses until one of them works (for flexible definitions of 'works'). I'm still not going to be paying for this garbage for my own use.

  4. Zack Mollusc Silver badge

    Misleading figures

    The article posits large expenditure for AI, but completely fails to consider that ongoing costs will be greatly reduced by management cutting the budgets every quarter and forcing the AI to run on ever-fewer processors on ever-decreasing amounts of electricity.

  5. that one in the corner Silver badge

    Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out

    How to make this AI into a viable, profit-making enterprise - without trying to entrap everyone into ever-rising monthly/weekly/hourly subscription fees by ensuring it is a "necessary" part of every software tool available, whether we want it or not.

    You think it is annoying when a program refuses to work when it can't connect to the Internet, for no obvious reason? Wait until they all need your AI access token before they'll let you edit a file...

  6. DS999 Silver badge

    They talk about building new datacenters

    As if the old ones become obsolete the minute new ones are up and running. I wonder how long of an amortization period they are projecting on these datacenters - both the physical building and the computing gear inside. If Nvidia keeps increasing the amount of power per rack as they project (up to 1 megawatt per rack by the end of the decade!) it won't be possible to upgrade old datacenters, if for no other reason than they won't have sufficient power available even if you gutted them and upgraded the cooling and inside plumbing/wiring.

    So not only will they be spending astronomical sums on these datacenters, they might be abandoning them in just a few short years - once the performance per watt is too far behind new ones it will be uneconomical to keep using them. If AI succeeds at Altman's wildest dreams he'll leave behind a blight of useless concrete buildings, where the utility has made lots of investment in upgrading electrical service but without the usual 30 years they project to amortize THEIR costs. Who pays that? We do, the customers of that utility.

    1. Irongut Silver badge

      Re: They talk about building new datacenters

      If AI succeeds at Altman's wildest dreams he'll leave behind a scorched Earth that experiences the worst predictions for climate change, patrolled by kill bots and Terminators.

  7. MrAptronym

    "Advances in technology could provide an answer" yeah, in the same way a wizard could I guess.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like