Re: Ever hear of the NSA?
Claptrap314,
The NSA is an intelligence gathering agency, rather than a military one. I presume it has offensive cyber capabilities - which might well have a more military focus - and it's not like intelligence gathering isn't a military thing too. There's a lot of overlap. Which is why these organisations tend to end up in a rat's nest of competing and overlapping responsibilies and internal departmental infighting.
However the military world is changing. There are a lot more drones, there are a lot more integrated systems based on networks - quite a lot of the lastest military thinging involves forming ad hoc networks to merge sensor information on-the-fly (literally when planes and drones are involved) in order to be able to find and hit targets more quickly. All of that is incredibly vulnerable to cyber-attack. As well as traditional electronic warfare.
Obviously this is both a threat and an opportunity. i.e. stopping it being done to you, and also doing it to the enemy.
As an example, look at Israel's operation Orchard / Outside the Box from 2007. This was an air attack on a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor, possibly as part of a nuclear weapons program. Syria had a complex integrated air defence system, which unaccountably switched off during the attack. That could have been the result of a cyber-attack or a physical attack - or even some combination of the two. But it's the sort of thing you need to plan for, as a military. And having all the computer skills in the civilian intelligence sector would lead to inter-departmental fun-and-games.
Not that I'm arguing you need a cyber force, or a space force for that matter. Just that as things change, you'll probably need to look at organisational structures.