back to article Nvidia is cozying up to China with Shanghai R&D lab plans, Senators cry

Nvidia is reportedly planning to open a new research and development facility in Shanghai, China, drawing sharp criticism from a pair of US lawmakers. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) sent a letter [PDF] to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang expressing concern that the planned facility could support China's …

  1. abend0c4 Silver badge

    Support for autocratic regimes

    When one autocratic regime turns off the "taxpayer-funded research" tap another one turns it on. The usual rule applies: follow the money. It's the only ideology that counts.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Support for autocratic regimes

      autocratic regime... pot, meet kettle...

      1. Groo The Wanderer - A Canuck

        Re: Support for autocratic regimes

        NVidia has no choice but to deal with the Drumpf Regime, and it costs them far more pride and loss-of-face to do so than to deal with China! At least China honours their deals instead of tearing them up the second time they're elected like Drumpf did the free trade agreements with Canada and Mexico that HE SIGNED on his last go round at office! :o

    2. flayman

      Re: Support for autocratic regimes

      US national security and autocratic regimes in the same breath. It would be hilarious if it weren't so ridiculous.

  2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    Erect artificial trade barriers and be amazed at the consequences.

  3. Bitsminer Silver badge

    Ironic...

    ...the US senators quoting foreign media (FT, Reuters) and the dreaded New York Times while trying to support US tech.

  4. Phil Leotardo

    Go figure

    Gee, let's cut funding to higher institutions who do research on things that big companies are invested in. Let's see how the liberals like that one!

  5. ecofeco Silver badge
    FAIL

    LOL wut?

    Maybe the entire USA corporate oligarchy should have thought back in the 1980s when they sent EVERY job and tech to China.

    Dumbasses, the lot.

    1. UnknownUnknown Silver badge

      Re: LOL wut?

      … and India. See IBM. Don’t forget Service Economy too.

      (and Mexico, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Turkey, Ireland, Thailand, Taiwan, … with UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Cambodia, Laos, North Korea, Gaza, Sudan and Yemen soon to follow).

      Corporate America (and Europe/Canada) fucked the US, nit China/Taiwan. They were just (gleefully) open for business. See Tim Cook/Apple and the $Tn dollar I-stuff hi-Tech manufacturing ecosystem they built over 30 years. By choice.

      1. ecofeco Silver badge

        Re: LOL wut?

        Oh yes indeed and your one downvoter can fuck right off.

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    To the limit

    Corporations will go to the limit of the law to make money and if vague will challenge it to esnure their competitors have a level playing field. So the answer is obvious, the law must be clear and well written. Then corporations can make their decisions. Nvidia is free to move outside of the US but may then suffer import bans or tariffs. I just want laws made for the best interests of the majority of citizens not the few.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: To the limit

      may then suffer import bans or tariffs

      They already suffered bans/tariffs while based in the US...

      The reasons you might want such companies based in your country include collecting taxes on their revenues, the employment they provide and ownership of critical technologies. However, if the government doesn't want to effectively tax them, doesn't like the employment they offer (no jobs putting tiny screws into iPhones) and is hostile to science and research (because it's woke and elitist) you have to wonder why the US government would care where hi-tech businesses were based.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: To the limit

        > you have to wonder why the US government would care where hi-tech businesses were based.

        Spoilt toddler syndrome: I don’t want to play, therefore you can not play without me.

        Seen this where toddler will deliberately sabotage what others are doing, just because they don’t want the other kids to play without them, even though the toddler has no idea of what they actually want to do.

        1. flayman

          Re: To the limit

          Rule by id (as opposed to ego).

    2. This post has been deleted by its author

    3. ecofeco Silver badge

      Re: To the limit

      Wrong. They will not go to the limit of the law, they will outright BREAK the law every chance they think they can get away with and they get away with it, a lot.

      To the limit. LOL, what naivete.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like