back to article German court parks four Volkswagen execs in jail over Dieselgate scandal

Germany’s Braunschweig Regional Court has reportedly sentenced four Volkswagen executives to jail over “Dieselgate” – the 2015 scandal in which the automaker was found to have fudged software used to test its vehicles’ pollution emissions. The matter concerned nitrogen oxide emissions, which software installed by Volkswagen …

  1. tony72

    A rare case of execs actually being held to account. I guess some scandals are just too big to sweep under the carpet.

    1. Korev Silver badge
      Pirate

      Thames Water next? Although the fine was massive, the people who ran the company and made those decisions will just move on.

      1. blackcat Silver badge

        Not defending Thames water, as the management has been utterly appalling, but it does seem that some of the waste water issues in the UK are self induced.

        https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn055462jy1o

      2. PCScreenOnly

        they did move on

        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgleg70r7rno

      3. Tron Silver badge

        My first thought on hearing of the Thames Water fine...

        ...Wow, their bills are really going to rise.

      4. Nematode Bronze badge

        Thames Water case heralding a return to the Watergate headline?

    2. Eclectic Man Silver badge
      Unhappy

      re: Sentences

      The sentences of between 15 and 54 months seems to me to be a bit of a range, considering how much damage was done to the environment for years. I may be a bit biased as I am asthmatic, but air pollution levels due to traffic emissions have killed people. OK so it is probably not possible to prove VW is directly responsible, but I cannot help feeling that this should have been taken into account.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: re: Sentences

        A big reason for the problems was the totally artificial 'standard' test cycle for fuel consumption and hence emissions. Manufacturers like VW (and I'm sure there were many more) calibrated their engines to give the best results on that cycle (which was illegal cheating, of course), even though the result was that real world driving behaviour was worse. If they had been able to simply optimise their engines properly for real world driving we would have had lower consumption and emissions overall. Doesn't excuse the illegal behaviour, of course, but is a classic example of government interference leading to unexpected consequences.

        1. PCScreenOnly

          Re: re: Sentences

          Real World Tests are what should be used, but it is slow and a drawn out process and you can guarantee that if certain test routes are used someone will complain as that company used this route, that company used that route.

          Need to define it far better - but all of them are at it - even now on the adverts where they say WTLP may differ from real usage and tout WTLP figures - which are clearly incorrect

          1. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge

            Re: re: Sentences

            Why does anyone need standardized tests? Government loves them because they can base taxes on them, but do buyers actually care? In the past we used the figures from magazine road tests, today there are lots of websites with those figures, which are much more trustworthy and realistic than WLTP figures because they represent the way people actually use the vehicle.

        2. O'Reg Inalsin

          Re: re: Sentences

          It wasn't just calibrating the engine. The company installed software, commonly referred to as a "defeat device", in their diesel vehicles that could detect when the car was undergoing laboratory emissions testing. When a test was detected, the software activated emissions controls to ensure the car met regulatory standards. However, during regular driving, the software reduced the effectiveness of these controls, resulting in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions up to 40 times higher than legal limits.

          1. Eclectic Man Silver badge
            Flame

            Re: re: Sentences

            According to The Guardian, there are 16000 deaths attributable to 'Dieselgate':

            "The excess pollution emitted as a result of the Dieselgate scandal has killed about 16,000 people in the UK and caused 30,000 cases of asthma in children, according to a new analysis. A further 6,000 premature deaths will occur in coming years without action, the researchers said.

            The Dieselgate scandal erupted in 2015 when diesel cars were found to be emitting far more toxic air pollution on the roads than when they passed regulatory tests, due to the use of illegal “defeat devices”."

            https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/28/dieselgate-pollution-killed-16000-people-in-uk-study-estimates

            I stand by my previous post regarding sentences.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: re: Sentences

              That report seems to assume that the excessive NOx levels under the conditions of the test cycle can be extrapolated to all circumstances, which is unlikely. High levels of NOx are usually caused by the very high combustion temperature associated with extremely lean mixtures. Such mixtures often result from attempts to burn as little fuel as possible to reduce CO2 levels, as required by the test regime.

              Even if the result was excessive NOx at certain points of the test, it seems unlikely that levels were excessive over the whole driving cycle, so the Grauniad report exaggerates the consequences.

        3. JoeCool Silver badge

          calibrated their engines to give the best results

          I'm going to repeat the correct repsonse here :

          It was not a calibration. It was a software defeat routine which detected and then cheated on the test cycle.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: calibrated their engines to give the best results

            Doesn't really matter whether you call it calibration or programming, the essential behaviour is the same. Setting up the engine for good real-world performance caused it to fail under the artificial test cycle, but setting it up to pass the test cycle caused poor performance and fuel consumption under real conditions, so they arranged it to (illegally) detect when it was being tested, and fake the results.

            If they'd been allowed to simply program it for best real-world fuel usage it would have been less polluting in general, even if it gave bad figures for the spot cases of the artificial test cycle.

            I'm not defending VW, they broke the rules and were punished for it, but those nonsensical rules were the main problem. The fact that the test cycle has been changed from NEDC to WLTP is a tacit admission the the older test cycle was flawed.

            1. Diogenes8080

              Re: calibrated their engines to give the best results

              No, the defeat subroutine was deliberately detecting and reacting to "rolling road" test bays. It is not a question of optimising the engine for one driving profile or another. Wookies do not use rolling roads!

              1. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: calibrated their engines to give the best results

                Isn't that what I just said?

                1. Androgynous Cow Herd

                  Re: calibrated their engines to give the best results

                  No. Not at all.

    3. Groo The Wanderer - A Canuck

      I wish they'd do that here in Canada, ideally starting from the very top of management with the CEO's and CFOs

    4. DS999 Silver badge
      Trollface

      CEOs in the US

      Are no doubt scratching their heads and saying "there can be legal consequences for fraud? Who knew that could be the case? Glad that's not true here!"

    5. Dagg Silver badge

      Have any of the UK Post office execs served time yet?

      1. Big Softie

        None of them have even been charged...

        Unfortunately, scandals in the UK seem to follow the same pattern. A massively long public enquiry which lasts for years and costs the taxpayer a fortune and during which the lawyers present get extremely rich. The final report is massive but the key summary is "everyone is very sorry, mistakes were made and lessons have been learned". Meantime many of the victims have passed away and those guilty of misconduct and subsequent cover-up have moved onto bigger and better things, or disappeared completely.

        Too many publicly funded institutions are permitted to be a law unto themselves whilst protesting to be transparent and accountable.

    6. Sam Shore

      "A rare case of execs actually being held to account"

      And almost at the same time, a judge threatens an Apple exec, and Apple suddenly comes to a settlement with Epic after how many years and how many billions. Now Fortnite is back on IOS. It's almost as if holding execs to account makes companies act differently. How refreshing.

      https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/19/judge-pressures-apple-to-approve-fortnite-or-return-to-court/

  2. HMcG

    >Another case, against Martin Winterkorn, the former CEO of Volkswagen AG, remains stalled due to his age and ill health.

    So if you get away with it long enough to become old, or ill, you effectively get off without appropriate punishment?

    Or perhaps a case of if you are rich enough to have a private doctor supply a sick-note, you never have to face justice.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Maybe his ill health was caused by overexposure to NOx?

    2. F. Frederick Skitty Silver badge

      An alternative is to fake having Alzheimer's, get released from prison and become the only person to recover from that condition. Known as doing an "Ernest Saunders", after a convicted business executive. Helps to have oodles of money to pay for compliant expert witnesses.

      1. Fruit and Nutcase Silver badge
    3. Sam Shore

      Courts tend to be very pragmatic. Cases that take years cost millions. No-one wants to have a 4 year multimillion $ court case stumble in the last week because the 78 year old defendant drops dead of old age.

      1. gnasher729 Silver badge

        78 year old defendant- does Trump go to court?

    4. cyberdemon Silver badge
      Holmes

      So give him a massive fine instead, something like his VW salary+bonuses multiplied by the would-be jail term, plus prosecution costs; which if he dies before paying, would be taken from his estate

    5. NoneSuch Silver badge

      "So if you get away with it long enough to become old, or ill, you effectively get off without appropriate punishment?"

      AKA The Trump Approach.

      1. Eclectic Man Silver badge
        Unhappy

        AKA The Trump Approach.

        If you have a strong stomach, also look up 'Jimmy Savile' (definitely not for the 'faint of heart'). He was one of the worst sex offenders ever revealed, and died before any allegations were made public.

    6. PCScreenOnly

      Like that Abercrombe & Finch nonce

  3. navarac Silver badge

    Legacy

    I still wouldn't look at a Volkswagen vehicle.

    1. Headley_Grange Silver badge

      Re: Legacy

      Do you believe that other manufacturers are completely innocent or just didn't get caught?

      1. PCScreenOnly

        Re: Legacy

        Most are in court. I know Mercedes are in court in October - based on the latest newsletter I got

    2. cd

      Re: Legacy

      In the USA, VW is a dumb driver brand, like Nissan and Jeep.

      Anything Stellantis, really.

      1. Dave@Home

        Re: Legacy

        VW isn't part of Stellantis

      2. Snake Silver badge

        Re: Legacy

        Modern Nissans = Japanese Stellantis: trash transmissions and cheap interiors. You'd think that Ghosn trained at Chrysler!

        What it truly shows is when beancounters get control of anything involving required engineering moxie (Nissan, Stellantis, Boeing, BMW, Mercedes-Benz) trash output results.

      3. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Legacy

        In the UK, you are dumb (or now racist) to have a US car

        1. Snake Silver badge

          Re: US cars in UK

          To be honest, owning a US car in the UK I believe has always been troublesome in comparison to owning something else. More difficult to get parts as well as technicians willing to work on them, left hand drive-only on some models, designed for much wider US roads, etc.

          Of course, Cheeto Jesus hasn't made anything better...

    3. Chz

      Re: Legacy

      I mean, I mostly wouldn't buy them because they're turning out bad cars now. VW used to make a pretty decent machine, but their massive cost cutting (partly due to overinvestment in China, where the local carmakers have taken back a large part of the market) has resulted in some pretty poor models of late. Add to that the baffling decision a few years back to make every control in the car touch sensitive that they're only slowly rolling back now due to horrendous feedback from owners. I was in an Audi Q4 a few months ago, and the assembly quality and materials were shocking for what's supposedly a premium model. My Mazda is nicer.

      Dieselgate ranks second in my reasons for avoiding them, because as others have said nearly everyone was gaming that system. Just not quite so nakedly cheating as VW was.

    4. CowHorseFrog Silver badge

      Re: Legacy

      But a truck is ok ?

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Do they have an executive lounge and gym?

    Ask for a friend…

  5. Johnb89

    Now can we get these cars off the road?

    Given that the recall to fix this was voluntary, and many VW group cars haven't had it (evidenced by the horrible smell out the back of lots of them), can we just get these cars off the road?

    Sending people to prison and fining VW doesn't actually reduce the air pollution they cause or fix the deaths caused (see guardian article today), or make it pleasant to be behind one of these driving, or worse, cycling.

    Its time. If you have one its time to scrap it. If you know someone with one, do some hinting.

    1. MarkTriumphant

      Re: Now can we get these cars off the road?

      Creating a new car to replace it would almost certainly be worse. Let them run to End of Life.

    2. Chz

      Re: Now can we get these cars off the road?

      It's a pity that checking if recalls have been processed isn't a part of the MOT. There are a number of VW owners who've skipped it because it gives them less power and mileage.

  6. ecofeco Silver badge

    Jailtime?

    Damn commie China and Europe always jailing their criminal businessmen!

    How un-American!

    /s in case needed.

    1. Eclectic Man Silver badge

      Re: Jailtime?

      I thought the Enron 'smartest guys in the room' got sent to prison in the USA, or was that an aberration?

  7. Catch-the-Pigeon

    disguised renumeration car loans

    They should do the same with the idiots who devised and ripped off loads of people hard earned money with the DR scheme. They owe me thousands in compensation and I have to wait till this while the investigation continues.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like