
So Sam wants to get paid...
While taking other people's stuff for free ?
I don't think so...
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says his company doesn’t have a master plan but does hope to develop a product that’s akin to a subscription operating system, but for AI, and models that ingest every experience you have in your life The enfant terrible of AI thought-bubbled those idea in a Q&A session at an early May event called AI …
> We'll have these surfaces like future devices future things that are sort of similar to operating systems,” he added.
Did he ask his RNG word salad generator for that answer? That is one of the most wooly headed non-technical pieces of bullshit I've ever read. Does this man know anything about computers?
Also I'm glad this will be a subscription service so I can refuse to pay for it.
The entirety of the technocrat regime is saturated with psychoactive drugs. So much so that there’s a supply chain that follows them around to conferences and events. You’ll never have an easier time buying drugs than at a SpaceX or ChatGPT event.
Unfortunately, they all missed Alan Watts, so they genuinely believe they are onto something original. Meaning society is forced to deal with their infantile fumbling and species embarrassing decline. It’ll be a while before they realize Watts was entirely correct when he said “once you get the message, hang up the phone”.
Sam needs to show an ROI on AI infra (happy Azure) so yes making up things, but really there are so many inference-as-a-service APIs out there now that run on Open models like LLaMA, DeepSeek, Mistral, Gemma (Google), Qwen etc. why use a closed weights model that probably uses you private data for training, so he has no stickability.
Most of their revenue is from user paying $20/m and not API, so users can also switch to free or other tools ... I mean I don't really care about my past prompt/responses ... in fact prefer to delete them. I'm on paid version, finding also the API/paid GPT is slow